Armchair astronaut discovers Mars 'space station'
Armchair astronaut discovers Mars 'space station' |
|
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Armchair astronaut discovers Mars 'space station'
1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Armchair astronaut discovers Mars 'space station' using Google earth | |
ID: 1113968 ·  | |
|
Could be one of the Mars Rovers ..... But I doubt we could see it with that clarity that far away. | |
| ID: 1113987 · | |
|
Do we know the coordinates of the current rovers and the viking probes? or could this just be a rock? | |
| ID: 1114042 · | |
|
I have to say it's intriguing to say the least ;-) | |
| ID: 1114063 · | |
|
Something doesn't add up. If the "object" is in fact 150 feet long then it should be clearly seen. My house is 80 feet long and is clearly identifiable as such in Google Earth in the satellite picture. I assume that the camera involved is as good as the one that produced the google earth satellite images. | |
| ID: 1114109 · | |
Something doesn't add up. If the "object" is in fact 150 feet long then it should be clearly seen. My house is 80 feet long and is clearly identifiable as such in Google Earth in the satellite picture. I assume that the camera involved is as good as the one that produced the google earth satellite images. I would normally agree with that...but the pixelation doesn't really add up with the actual said 'structure.' There are too many smaller 'structures' around alleged pixelation. I would think if it was a pixel error, then it would look just about the same as the pixels we see in the example. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114119 · | |
Do we know the coordinates of the current rovers and the viking probes? or could this just be a rock? I believe it is available on the JPL site, though as of this posting I have not looked. I used to be very much into the raw data on the JPL site from the rovers and remember seeing it somewhere. I would have to look again though. EDIT: Yup I was correct. Here is the page: http://marsrover.nasa.gov/mission/traverse_maps.html...As of Sol 2614 (June 1, 2011), Opportunity's odometry is 30,055.50 meters (30.06 kilometers, or 18.68 miles). So I assume that Opportunity is 18.68 miles from it's landing site. Spirit is dead in the water. Here is a link to ALL the maps for Opportunity, from landing point to present day: http://marsrover.nasa.gov/mission/tm-opportunity-all.html I have not looked up the viking crafts, the Phoenix crafts or any other "rovers." ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114121 · | |
|
Just an update: Someone on Above Top Secret made a rendering of what they think it would look like as a habitat, had humans made it (not sure if this is an actual NASA rendering) | |
| ID: 1114141 · | |
|
I saw that a while back while looking at mars. I didn't report it because I thought it was ice. I still think that. ;) | |
| ID: 1114143 · | |
I saw that a while back while looking at mars. I didn't report it because I thought it was ice. I still think that. ;) A pretty good geometrical formation to be ice. EDIT: also compare the image below to the actual image:  Upper right corner area...almost a similarity. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114145 · | |
I saw that a while back while looking at mars. I didn't report it because I thought it was ice. I still think that. ;) Next time I see something near Area 51 on Google earth I'm saying something. lol | |
| ID: 1114148 · | |
|
Another update...though I am only posting this link because it made me LOL. | |
| ID: 1114150 · | |
Another update...though I am only posting this link because it made me LOL. Could be a crashed UFO. I think we need to move the Hubble and get a better photo. I was looking for lost (crashed) spacecraft and the Viking Landers when I stumbled upon it. Anyone know where they are located? | |
| ID: 1114151 · | |
Another update...though I am only posting this link because it made me LOL. I agree with a better photo. I am hoping NASA will at least investigate this a little bit. Though I am not sure what is in orbit around Mars to get such a HI-RES image. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114152 · | |
|
A California armchair astronomer claims a white, fuzzy image on the red planet's surface might be evidence of life -- and even NASA didn't immediately know what if anything he had found. | |
| ID: 1114179 · | |
|
Jasons before and after filter pictures do look remarkably similiar. Are we are sure that this isn't an elaborate hoax? I would be quite easy to doctor images in that way. Just asking .... | |
| ID: 1114208 · | |
Jasons before and after filter pictures do look remarkably similiar. Are we are sure that this isn't an elaborate hoax? I would be quite easy to doctor images in that way. Just asking .... As I said I am not sure if the first rendering I posted was a NASA rendering of a possible future habitat on Mars, or if it was someones interpretation of what they believed a Mars habitat would look like (Not from NASA or the likes). I have been unable to locate that image through NASA's databases. However, for the purpose of comparing I will use it as somewhat of an overlay with an official NASA rendering (since there is, or at least I cannot find a larger NASA rendering of one of the previous images I posted below, this will have to suffice). Image posted below my reply to you. As to a hoax, I am not sure of the history of Goolge and their ability or inability to play tricks with people on their Earth and Mars viewer programs. But if it is a hoax, then it would have to be something created by Google, or the companies that took the satellite photos. Here are the coordinates of said structure again so everyone can look it up on Google earth/Mars: 49'19.73"N 29 33'06.53"W Note the shadows in the image labeled as original and the second filtered original. Whatever this is, it is quite tall. I say so because of the shadow line it casts on some parts of this 'structure.'  ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114229 · | |
A California armchair astronomer claims a white, fuzzy image on the red planet's surface might be evidence of life -- and even NASA didn't immediately know what if anything he had found. Now the plot thickens. The user has deleted the video from his account. And his account has also mysteriously disappeared. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114232 · | |
Another update...though I am only posting this link because it made me LOL. This is as close to corrdinates for the Viking crafts as I could find on a quick search: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/MRO/multimedia/mro-20061204-v2.html NASA's Viking Lander 2 landed on Mars on Sept. 3, 1976, in Utopia Planitia. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1114246 · | |
|
Unless I am doing something wrong, I cannot get the coordinates to appear on Google Mars. EDIT: Nevermind. I got it. And no...it's not near any known landers, crafts, rovers or etc. It is literally alone in the middle of no where. | |
| ID: 1114249 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Armchair astronaut discovers Mars 'space station'
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |
