Who to identify the interesting work-units?

Message boards : Number crunching : Who to identify the interesting work-units?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Timi
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 99
Posts: 25
Credit: 6,533,108
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 44320 - Posted: 8 Nov 2004, 16:35:09 UTC

In Classic-Seti and with the help of SetiSpy application, we were able to identify the interesting workunits (green color in the skymap). Is there an algorithm to identify them in the BOINC-Seti too?
What do we need to search and calculate in the result file of a workunit that make it interesting?

Thanks and Keep crunching!
ID: 44320 · Report as offensive
Profile Thierry Van Driessche
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3083
Credit: 150,096
RAC: 0
Belgium
Message 44325 - Posted: 8 Nov 2004, 17:01:47 UTC
Last modified: 8 Nov 2004, 17:02:03 UTC

One of the possibilities is using BoincLogX. It can be downloaded here.

In combination with Mapview, you can ask for the details of spikes, gaussians, pulses and triplets.
ID: 44325 · Report as offensive
Profile Timi
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 99
Posts: 25
Credit: 6,533,108
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 44362 - Posted: 8 Nov 2004, 19:13:00 UTC

Thanks but I'm not asking for an application to do that.
Which data from the result file can make out that a workunit is interesting?
ID: 44362 · Report as offensive
Profile Timi
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 99
Posts: 25
Credit: 6,533,108
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 44717 - Posted: 9 Nov 2004, 13:04:00 UTC

For example, in SetiSpy source there is a:

Result := (Fit > 0) and (PeakPower > 0) and (Fit and from ?
Can someone -inside the Project, maybe Ron- tell me that the above is correct?

Thanks
ID: 44717 · Report as offensive
Profile Timi
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 99
Posts: 25
Credit: 6,533,108
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 44718 - Posted: 9 Nov 2004, 13:05:48 UTC

Sorry, there was a problem with the posting here.

The correct commands are

Result := (Fit>0) and (PeakPower>0) and (Fit
ID: 44718 · Report as offensive
Profile Timi
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 99
Posts: 25
Credit: 6,533,108
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 44719 - Posted: 9 Nov 2004, 13:06:56 UTC

Well, the forum cannot let me post the correct commands... 8-(
ID: 44719 · Report as offensive
Ron Roe
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 02
Posts: 156
Credit: 24,124
RAC: 0
United States
Message 44724 - Posted: 9 Nov 2004, 13:27:01 UTC - in response to Message 44719.  
Last modified: 9 Nov 2004, 13:33:48 UTC

> Well, the forum cannot let me post the correct commands... 8-(
>

It thinks you are trying to use HTML code when you use: <

Use all four chars: &lt; then you get <
ID: 44724 · Report as offensive
Profile Timi
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 99
Posts: 25
Credit: 6,533,108
RAC: 0
Greece
Message 44797 - Posted: 9 Nov 2004, 16:04:34 UTC

Result := (Fit > 0) and (PeakPower > 0) and (Fit < MinValue([2.0 + 1.6*PeakPower, 10.0]));

PS. Hope it works. If yes thanks Boinc User

ID: 44797 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Who to identify the interesting work-units?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.