GE 0% tax on multi billion profit |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Politics : GE 0% tax on multi billion profit
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 6 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
My guess is all corporations escape tax but GE is revolutionizing the tax escape art?! | |
| ID: 1092157 · | |
|
The primary reason for tax laws is to raise revenue, but another valid reason is to further practices that are important to the country, like mortgage tax breaks, or charitable contributions. GE is able to pay no taxes because they got Congress to agree to breaks for programs that Congress agreed were beneficial to the country. It's the other side of the spending coin: that government can reduce a payer's tax bill as an incentive for companies and individuals to do what the legislature thinks should be done, but can be done better by the private sector (either industry or citizens or sometimes both). | |
| ID: 1092176 · | |
|
Actually GE takes its biggest tax break because it headquarters out of the country. | |
| ID: 1092181 · | |
Maybe you are right that corporations do serious mega orders from government periodically and for that they deserve to keep billions of dollars of tax for themselves. But in case of USA there are thousands of public school teachers being laid off for every few months and serious duty public workers being laid off in large numbers due to related reason everyone is aware. Plus GE is (or any other corp) kind of tech flagship corp according to mainstream marketing campaigns. But typical google search finds out that like any other corporation GE was not clean from its financial books to technical performance reliability issues throughout its history. http://www.businessweek.com/2000/00_50/b3711013.htm http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/business/s_637423.html So as any typical G8 or G20 corporation GE seemingly constantly hurts its own public interest (maybe in a way that this kind of practice relates to fulfillment of country's political strategy interest that usually ignored in the media). Relating to this, corporations from emerging eastern countries are quickly adopting their belowed western mentor corporations examples every day. ____________ Mandtugai! | |
| ID: 1092183 · | |
Actually GE takes its biggest tax break because it headquarters out of the country. Really?! So their headquarters isn't at: General Electric Company 3135 Easton Turnpike Fairfield, Connecticut 06828 Could have fooled Jeffrey R. Immelt, Chairman of the Board, General Electric Company http://ir.10kwizard.com/download.php?format=PDF&ipage=7438579&source=329 You owe GE an apology. Full disclosure, I am a shareholder of GE. You can be happy to know the $0.56/share I get after GE's income tax is then taxed on my personal income taxes before I get to spend it in the USA. Don't you worry, it is getting well taxed in America. ____________ | |
| ID: 1092365 · | |
|
• GE International headquarters, Brussels | |
| ID: 1092372 · | |
|
Your post and this thread was originally about GE, not GE International. What's with the bait-and-switch? | |
| ID: 1092503 · | |
|
What usual common sense understand is either GE or of those usual corporations are pretty much legalized mafias that loot billions of local tax duty money and through international sophisticated money laundry process locate their loots all over the world plus Swiss mass looted money storage "banks" namely UBS and etc... | |
| ID: 1092580 · | |
|
Um.. NYSE=GE. What bait and switch? | |
| ID: 1092586 · | |
• GE International headquarters, Brussels http://ir.10kwizard.com/download.php?format=PDF&ipage=7438579&source=329 Page 20, Item 2 Item 2. Properties You managed to confuse a subsidiary with the owner. [edit] Pop yourself down to Exhibit 21 starting on page 248 where you will see they are a 100% owned subsidiary. ____________ | |
| ID: 1092642 · | |
|
Oh, soft-one, my "bait-and-switch" remark was just tweaking your nose a little. | |
| ID: 1092711 · | |
|
This is easy to fix. If we just tax the rich, we can solve our budget problems. Here's how: | |
| ID: 1092725 · | |
|
I support the homeowner deduction(on a first and primary home) UNDER THE CURRENT TAX STRUCTURE. There are (obviously) many other deductions and credits that can be addressed first. | |
| ID: 1092730 · | |
Your post and this thread was originally about GE, not GE International. What's with the bait-and-switch? I'd say that a couple who adopt 5 special needs children is deserving of a tax break. They are doing an immense service to society and we should help them anyway we can. GEs tax refund was rather larger, and I don't think it made as dramatic a difference to the lives of those who received it. Just piling more tax payers money on people who don't need it. ____________ In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams | |
| ID: 1092735 · | |
GEs tax refund was rather larger, and I don't think it made as dramatic a difference to the lives of those who received it. Just piling more tax payers money on people who don't need it. Who received it? The employees they hired with it? The people who bought a home with a mortgage financed by it? The lower cost of the green energy wind turbines they made? The R&D people who lowered the carbon emissions of their jet engines? Just who received it? As to how much tax, did you read the amount in tax they did pay? Did you see it was north of $1 Billion dollars? ____________ | |
| ID: 1092751 · | |
I'd say that a couple who adopt 5 special needs children is deserving of a tax break. They are doing an immense service to society and we should help them anyway we can. I agree the tax break to the couple that adopted five kids was a good thing; but you cite nothing that GE did for their tax breaks that was evil, or not even such a good idea. Nor do you acknowledge that to get those "breaks" GE had to invest in some "thing" to get the break, and they would have spent more to get the break than the deduction which resulted from it, thus boosting the economy. | |
| ID: 1092763 · | |
|
I would consider lobbying to get those tax breaks qualfies as "evil". | |
| ID: 1092764 · | |
I support the homeowner deduction(on a first and primary home) UNDER THE CURRENT TAX STRUCTURE. There are (obviously) many other deductions and credits that can be addressed first. So, since corporate tax rates are lower in most of the developed OECD countries vice the United States, maybe GE should just sell their windmills and other products to every other country and not to the U.S.? Not to mention, our currency is being devalued by the day which makes it less attractive on sales vice currencies of other developed countries. What is the incentive for GE to do any business here given they're a multinational company? Maybe Boeing will take a cue and move offshore where it can produce jetliners at a lower cost with GE jet engines produced overseas too. Then we can have another couple hundred thousand people on unemployment. Now that's progress! But, where will we get our windmills for wind energy from then? | |
| ID: 1092766 · | |
I would consider lobbying to get those tax breaks qualfies as "evil". Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Whatever you say. ____________ | |
| ID: 1092772 · | |
|
Keith, we still have people here to buy things. As long as that exists there will be people to sell things. If profits that are made here get taxed here, I am fairly certain they will continue to make profits here. If not, we can move forward without them. The Walmart argument of "give us big breaks or we will not build our store in your town" is dead. So is the rest of the "I am going to take my ball and go home" mentality. Please do. | |
| ID: 1092774 · | |
Message boards : Politics : GE 0% tax on multi billion profit
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |