Ancient Aliens - What's the proof? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Ancient Aliens - What's the proof?
Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
lets look at it like this People have been seeing "UFOs" since the dawn of man. So you are going to tell me that Egyptians, in the case of this argument, didn't see them? I don't think everything we see today are UFOs (alien ships), but why wouldn't they have seen something if not just once or twice? that would easily account for why we don't see constant pictures of them spread around walls of pyramids or the likes. I truly believe UFOs exist, though not in numerous forms like people claim today. So for only one or two or even five of them to appear on a small section of a wall doesn't surprise me at all. If UFOs or aliens or spaceships did visit Earth in the past, then it makes perfect sense for them to only show up in a hand full of places and not constantly (especially if it happened only once or twice etc...) EDIT: With that said, I think we have only uncovered a very small fraction of the ancient Egyptian cities and structures. After sitting unattended for a few thousand years in the desert and sand, its very possible that many of these ancient structures have been buried deep within the sand. ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1107847 · | |
|
sure people see unidentified things all the time. This doesn't make them alien as its been repeatedly explained before. Unidentified does not mean alien it just means we haven't got enough information yet. | |
| ID: 1107855 · | |
|
99.9% of all UFO sightings can be explained logically. It is the 0.1% that is the problem. All major countries in the world have encounters on their files that simply cannot be explained with todays knowlege. | |
| ID: 1107894 · | |
|
The distance between stars is too vast for living tissue to survive a space trip, however robotic life would be able to survive such trip. Lets send a probe to GlieseD to see if that planet is indeed habitable. Gliese is 20 ligth years from Earth, very close to the sun. | |
| ID: 1108135 · | |
|
its hard enough to get a probe accurately to Pluto. You want to send one unaided to A star light years away. At least in the solar system we can ignore the galactic wind and he galactic drift that would occur in the 40,000 years it would take to get there | |
| ID: 1108199 · | |
its hard enough to get a probe accurately to Pluto. You want to send one unaided to A star light years away. At least in the solar system we can ignore the galactic wind and he galactic drift that would occur in the 40,000 years it would take to get there Without having looked at the statistics of the Voyager probes, how far have they gone so far? ____________ "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 | |
| ID: 1108235 · | |
|
I would imagine the probe sent to GlieseD would use a fusion propulsion system, not Ion or fission propulsion. I do think sustained fusion will become a reality, hopefully in the next 40 years, fusion will reactors become comercially feasible and those can be applied to propulsion systems as well for spaceships. | |
| ID: 1108332 · | |
Without having looked at the statistics of the Voyager probes, how far have they gone so far? Voyagers Voyagers 2 | |
| ID: 1108335 · | |
|
Distance from Earth 17,402,516,601 KM | |
| ID: 1108343 · | |
|
Nice link, thanks :-) | |
| ID: 1108353 · | |
|
With todays very best technology, it would still take thousands of years to get to our nearest star. | |
| ID: 1108448 · | |
|
I can't wait ?? | |
| ID: 1108546 · | |
I can't wait ?? Daddio my old friend, Here is a hint of what will be possible once i go public. Try to understand the physics of this Daddio. If i'm correct about my scientific findings, you will be able to accelerate a machine at hundreds or thousands of G's for short periods of time taking your ship close too the speed of light. But inside the vehicle, the passengers will just experience normal standard G-forces in a controlled environment. For the flight crew inside the ship, they won't experience the massive force being exerted on the ship itself. Sounds like science fiction, doesn't it? Well its about to happen! I'm not making this up Daddio, you have known me for many years now. We have spoken many times on the phone. You know i'm a grounded scientifically minded guy. Its real Daddio, i'm at this for years now and i have finally cracked it! I'm just working out the final physics of how it will work. I would not make a false claim like this unless i was absolutely sure about the physics of what i'm suggesting. I don't have the money to develope or build anything big. I can only put the concept out into the public domain and see what other's can do with the new physics. John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1108616 · | |
|
johnnie, | |
| ID: 1108676 · | |
johnnie, If i told you the answer Daddio, would you argue with me and dispute the answer and quote a thousand reasons why i'm wrong? Or using very simple physics, if i give you part of the solution, would you accept the scientific explanation if it makes logical sense, but goes against mainstream science? And i promice i will use your formula F=ma John. ____________ | |
| ID: 1108696 · | |
Ancient Aliens - What's the proof? The History channel lately in my opinion are showing the quality of shows that are on the SyFy channel. Not to be believed. | |
| ID: 1108756 · | |
I think THC is just tossing out ideas, sort of a 'food for thought'. Occasionally you get a steak, but more often than not you get a box of Cracker Jacks. Martin | |
| ID: 1108766 · | |
I'd say that at least one person posting to this thread has some experience with THC. :P ____________ | |
| ID: 1108809 · | |
I think THC is just tossing out ideas, sort of a 'food for thought'. The problem is too many people assume The History Channel is authoritative on facts of history. They owe it to their viewers to only show facts and not conjecture. | |
| ID: 1108810 · | |
I think THC is just tossing out ideas, sort of a 'food for thought'. :) People forget it's TV??? Start with that point of view...it will go a long ways towards resolving some far flung ideas. Martin | |
| ID: 1108850 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : Ancient Aliens - What's the proof?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |