NASA scientist finds evidence of alien life |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : NASA scientist finds evidence of alien life
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
NASA scientist finds evidence of alien life | |
| ID: 1084363 · | |
|
I hope this time it is proven fact. This news was just as exciting as when in 1995 they discovered the first extrasolar planet. :) | |
| ID: 1084431 · | |
|
A few years ago there was a similar claim made about a meteorite that supposedly had it's origins on Mars. There appeared to be remnants of threadlike bacilli fossils. Scientists could not agree however and it was shown that normal chemical processes could produce similar structures or formations in the rock. | |
| ID: 1084438 · | |
|
The new supposed bacterial fossils have at least one telling advantage over those alleged to have come from Mars. They are within the size range of known bacteria. The Mars 'fossils' were between 1/10 and 1/50 the size of the smaller bacteria. Although the Mars bacteria still have scientific backers, it is considered unlikely by most biologists that the features necessary to a bacterium could be housed in such small objects. Michael | |
| ID: 1084643 · | |
|
Agree, very tricky for someone to come out and say, alien life found on a meteorite. Once meteorites hit the ground, they are prone to becterial contamination, and scientist(s) can come to the assumption of that bacteria be alien. | |
| ID: 1085766 · | |
|
These guys that isolated this sample of unearthly type of microrgaism. They sat on this discovery for quite some time before it could be announced. Mind you this sample was from the center of the meterorite Cl1. It was not discovered until the meteor was sliced in half. To me it looks like a hydra organism. | |
| ID: 1087488 · | |
|
however that meteorite was laying on earth for a long time, while there, bacteriums could have contaminated it. | |
| ID: 1087967 · | |
|
They are fossilized so that dont make sense. | |
| ID: 1088299 · | |
however that meteorite was laying on earth for a long time, while there, bacteriums could have contaminated it. If you read the report, you would see that three where the evidence was found were observed by humans as they fell and all after 1800. Rather short time for fossils to appear and for bacteria to get to the center of the rock and be bacteria that don't show up as known on earth type. Especially as these rocks have spent their time inside labs since shortly after they fell. None of this rules out some non life method of deposition. Just plain interesting. Let's see what others find in the rocks. ____________ | |
| ID: 1088323 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : NASA scientist finds evidence of alien life
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |