astropule work but preferences set to no


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : astropule work but preferences set to no

Author Message
Profile sctpgr
Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 03
Posts: 1
Credit: 1,300,525
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1056327 - Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 17:45:20 UTC

has anyone else been rec'ing astropulse units when their preferences are set to not have ap work?

I appreciate the new server and everything and work being generated i just don't have a machine that can plow through 196+ hours of work
____________

Profile Bill Walker
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 3374
Credit: 2,085,493
RAC: 2,319
Canada
Message 1056338 - Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 18:06:02 UTC

Some general comments on AP work:

If you haven't had one for a while, the initial time to completion estimate will be way too big. Try running one for a while before aborting it, and watch what happens to the time to completion estimate.

The deadlines set for AP work should allow you to complete them before the deadline if you keep your hours per day of computing fairly constant.

You will get slightly more credits per hour for an AP than an MB.
____________

JohnDKProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 May 00
Posts: 842
Credit: 44,561,646
RAC: 75,097
Denmark
Message 1056447 - Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 23:49:55 UTC - in response to Message 1056338.

You will get slightly more credits per hour for an AP than an MB.

I don't think that's correct anymore. Some months ago you got around 1200 for an AP WU, but now you only get maybe 700.

Profile SciManStevProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jun 99
Posts: 4861
Credit: 81,798,875
RAC: 40,414
United States
Message 1056448 - Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 23:54:25 UTC - in response to Message 1056447.

You will get slightly more credits per hour for an AP than an MB.

I don't think that's correct anymore. Some months ago you got around 1200 for an AP WU, but now you only get maybe 700.


I just did 2 of them at 1294.24 credits each.

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

JohnDKProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 May 00
Posts: 842
Credit: 44,561,646
RAC: 75,097
Denmark
Message 1056449 - Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 23:55:28 UTC - in response to Message 1056448.

You will get slightly more credits per hour for an AP than an MB.

I don't think that's correct anymore. Some months ago you got around 1200 for an AP WU, but now you only get maybe 700.


I just did 2 of them at 1294.24 credits each.

Steve

OK, wonder if it's the new standard again...

Profile SciManStevProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Jun 99
Posts: 4861
Credit: 81,798,875
RAC: 40,414
United States
Message 1056450 - Posted: 15 Dec 2010, 23:57:36 UTC - in response to Message 1056449.

You will get slightly more credits per hour for an AP than an MB.

I don't think that's correct anymore. Some months ago you got around 1200 for an AP WU, but now you only get maybe 700.


I just did 2 of them at 1294.24 credits each.

Steve

OK, wonder if it's the new standard again...


The only consistancy is change.

Steve
____________
Warning, addicted to SETI crunching!
Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group.
GPUUG Website

Profile Bill Walker
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 3374
Credit: 2,085,493
RAC: 2,319
Canada
Message 1056476 - Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 1:22:43 UTC - in response to Message 1056450.

You will get slightly more credits per hour for an AP than an MB.

I don't think that's correct anymore. Some months ago you got around 1200 for an AP WU, but now you only get maybe 700.


I just did 2 of them at 1294.24 credits each.

Steve

OK, wonder if it's the new standard again...


The only consistancy is change.

Steve


I'm not sure there really is a "standard". I get valid results for MB units from 30 to 130 credits each. I guess the real question is how many credits per hour (or per minute for you super crunchers) are you getting for APs? I haven't had one for months, but they used to be a little better than MBs, per hour.
____________

bill
Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 99
Posts: 861
Credit: 23,510,136
RAC: 25,226
United States
Message 1056478 - Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 1:44:47 UTC - in response to Message 1056327.

Yep, got one a while ago. Came in at 113 hours to completion. It's now at 31% after 3 hours of running. So say 10~12 hours to run. The machine is a Q9550 running at 3.4GHZ so you could try one. I'd guess your PC could finish one of 196HRS in around 25 to 30 hours actual.

Profile Pappa
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jan 00
Posts: 2562
Credit: 12,301,681
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1056484 - Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 2:02:41 UTC
Last modified: 16 Dec 2010, 2:03:24 UTC

What many have forgotten is, both MB and AP are a CPU resource. What means is that if you have been running MB, the the Durration Correction Factor is stablized for MB not AP. The AP app that is published is probably more effecient than the MB app.

So the time estimates "will be" whacked.

The only people who will have issues, are those who run AMD CPU's. That is a result of L2 Cache and compiler bias.

Regards
____________
Please consider a Donation to the Seti Project.

Josef W. SegurProject donor
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4247
Credit: 1,048,612
RAC: 268
United States
Message 1056507 - Posted: 16 Dec 2010, 4:34:18 UTC - in response to Message 1056484.

What many have forgotten is, both MB and AP are a CPU resource. What means is that if you have been running MB, the the Durration Correction Factor is stablized for MB not AP. The AP app that is published is probably more effecient than the MB app.
...

More importantly, the servers will be scaling the estimates for MB work such that the Duration Correction Factor should be someplace near 1. But AP WU estimates will not be scaled until ten have been validated. The combination of factors often work out such that the AP time estimates are about 5 to 10 times higher than they should be.

IMO, the stock CPU MB app is more efficient than the stock AP app, think back to how long early Beta versions of the MB app took to do a WU.
Joe

Message boards : Number crunching : astropule work but preferences set to no

Copyright © 2014 University of California