Continuing Progress |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Technical News : Continuing Progress
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
For those who were celebrating, hope you had a lovely thanksgiving weekend. Things around here were fairly mellow, though progress continues. | |
| ID: 1051937 · | |
|
Thanks for the news and the pictures. | |
| ID: 1051945 · | |
|
Want some cable straps? ;-) | |
| ID: 1051946 · | |
|
Nice! And thanks for the pic... | |
| ID: 1051947 · | |
|
You guys really rock! Those servers are in the best hands possible! | |
| ID: 1051948 · | |
Want some cable straps? ;-) that's a little expensive. I just use a twist-tie. You can buy it in a dollar store :) ____________ | |
| ID: 1051951 · | |
|
Thanks for the update Matt, | |
| ID: 1051952 · | |
|
Matt, | |
| ID: 1051953 · | |
|
I'm still concerned about ventilation after seeing that picture. If the new servers get too hot, the project is at risk of going down again. | |
| ID: 1051991 · | |
Want some cable straps? ;-) Plastic cable ties can be had for a few dollars for hundreds of them. ____________ BOINC WIKI | |
| ID: 1051992 · | |
|
Matt has probably thought of this and has an answer. | |
| ID: 1052018 · | |
|
Matt, thanks for the news! | |
| ID: 1052049 · | |
Matt has probably thought of this and has an answer. The resend option only increases server load. So not a good idea. And as every computer in the universe has no tasks and will be trying to make contact. It would be better to decrease the downloads/processor so that the host gets enough work for a few hours, and set the server enforced back-off to 60 mins and not the default 11 sec. The lower the server load the less likely chance of ghosts. | |
| ID: 1052050 · | |
...and set the server enforced back-off to 60 mins and not the default 11 sec... The default is now 5 minutes (in fact 303 secs). ;-) Gruß, Gundolf | |
| ID: 1052058 · | |
|
Excellent. Thanks for the update and pic. If I might ask, how much trouble would it be to replace your non-standard rack with a standard rack so that all the servers fit properly without having to be jury rigged? | |
| ID: 1052063 · | |
Not "every computer in the universe"... just every computer that has BOINC AND has connected to SETI...! (~ ½ a million, the last time I looked...) ____________ . | |
| ID: 1052064 · | |
|
...and they look cleaner if the excess bit is cut off. Want some cable straps? ;-) ____________ mic. | |
| ID: 1052065 · | |
Excellent. Thanks for the update and pic. If I might ask, how much trouble would it be to replace your non-standard rack with a standard rack so that all the servers fit properly without having to be jury rigged? The main problem, as Matt has explained, is that there is no such a thing as a "standard rack" - every manufacturer seems to have their own (non compatible) standard... The main problem with those cheap twist-ties is that the binding is metal, which can cause problems in a high-speed high-density data environment... ____________ . | |
| ID: 1052066 · | |
|
Great news and thanks for the pix! | |
| ID: 1052067 · | |
Excellent. Thanks for the update and pic. If I might ask, how much trouble would it be to replace your non-standard rack with a standard rack so that all the servers fit properly without having to be jury rigged? Well, if it was I In charge, I'd give these guys a call (or a similar vendor) http://www.racksolutions.com/home/all-products-by-photo/server-racks-cabinets-enclosures.html "Fits any server" and see if they can build me one that works. The main problem with those cheap twist-ties is that the binding is metal, which can cause problems in a high-speed high-density data environment... I prefer reusable velcro type wraps myself. | |
| ID: 1052114 · | |
Message boards : Technical News : Continuing Progress
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |