What to look for in motherbroads |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : What to look for in motherbroads
1 · 2 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
What to look for in motherbroads. I am going to build a pc intel i7 980 but cannot find info on good motherboards, it will have 2 ati graphics cards and main use games,cruching,and a little home work. | |
| ID: 1048616 · | |
|
What is actually most important is finding a chipset that supports your needs (primarily processor and RAM). Once you get that part down, it's a matter of finding a manufacturer that has the right components you're looking for utilizing that chipset. E.g., the right amount of PCI-e slots, the right size motherboard to fit a particular case (ATX vs mATX vs ITX vs BTX), the right amount of memory slots (more slots make for cheaper upgrades in the future), etc. | |
| ID: 1048647 · | |
|
i7's are not capable of running on 1156 motherboard. Hence all i7 motherboards are triple channel. | |
| ID: 1048822 · | |
i7's are not capable of running on 1156 motherboard. Hence all i7 motherboards are triple channel. -BeNt-: I suggest you read: http://www.intel.com/products/processor/corei7/specifications.htm There are i7's that are 1156 AND 1366. platinum: Depending on what your pocket book will deal with might limit what you would want to get. Can you give us an idea of what budget you have for a motherboard? Do you plan on using more then just the 2 graphics cards in the future? Do you have a good case for heat dissipation? (some of the motherboards bridges run very warm). The other questions people are asking are also valid. I would suggest Asus motherboards. I am using an Asus Rampage III Extreme on my big system. I have an i7 920 at 4.2G and it gets rated at 12220/3900 in Seti. The i7 980 should give you a bit more performance then that. ____________ | |
| ID: 1048831 · | |
|
my next system will most likely be twin Xeons. the I7-980 is pertty top end for a "normal" computer. twin graphics is "cutting edge" for a gamer. | |
| ID: 1048840 · | |
|
yes this was the right place for advice. i have about £2000 for the project, games are the main thing but landscape design crunching for seti and a little home work. | |
| ID: 1048856 · | |
i7's are not capable of running on 1156 motherboard. Hence all i7 motherboards are triple channel. That's not true, There are i7 cpus that will run on a socket 1156 motherboard, Like the i7 860, i7 870 and the i7 875K(unlocked). Click on the link that I made, You'll see all 3 that I mentioned there. ____________ BSG Anthem My Facebook page | |
| ID: 1048880 · | |
|
Now I have an Asus P7P55 Pro motherboard with an i5 750 cpu, i7 cpus add some faster speed, greater bandwidth support, 4 virtual cpu cores and of course a bigger price, An i7 on X58 is no better than on 1156. If You like having the latest stuff, Try Gigabyte, Otherwise stick with Asus. Asus may not have the worlds best interactive support online, But their software support is nothing to sneeze at. | |
| ID: 1048883 · | |
Now I have an Asus P7P55 Pro motherboard with an i5 750 cpu, i7 cpus add some faster speed, greater bandwidth support, 4 virtual cpu cores and of course a bigger price, An i7 on X58 is no better than on 1156. If You like having the latest stuff, Try Gigabyte, Otherwise stick with Asus. Asus may not have the worlds best interactive support online, But their software support is nothing to sneeze at. Say what? How do you come by this conclusion? ____________ | |
| ID: 1048896 · | |
|
When building a new PC, buying the motherboard is one the most important things to consider, since this is where everything will come together. | |
| ID: 1048897 · | |
Now I have an Asus P7P55 Pro motherboard with an i5 750 cpu, i7 cpus add some faster speed, greater bandwidth support, 4 virtual cpu cores and of course a bigger price, An i7 on X58 is no better than on 1156. If You like having the latest stuff, Try Gigabyte, Otherwise stick with Asus. Asus may not have the worlds best interactive support online, But their software support is nothing to sneeze at. X58 does have more memory bandwidth than 1156, But a Quad Core cpu still only uses and does so much and I have one of the oldest Quad Core cpus in My current PC, A QX6700 B1(ES) cpu. I think the limit is about 4.0-4.3GHz for both cpu types(X58 and 1156). ____________ BSG Anthem My Facebook page | |
| ID: 1048912 · | |
Now I have an Asus P7P55 Pro motherboard with an i5 750 cpu, i7 cpus add some faster speed, greater bandwidth support, 4 virtual cpu cores and of course a bigger price, An i7 on X58 is no better than on 1156. If You like having the latest stuff, Try Gigabyte, Otherwise stick with Asus. Asus may not have the worlds best interactive support online, But their software support is nothing to sneeze at. You're mixing up two different technologies. The X58 chipset is found on both Socket 1366 and Socket 1156 motherboards. Stating that a X58 has more memory bandwidth than a 1156 is therefore inaccurate and misleading. If you were to rephrase that and say that the X58 on S1366 has more memory bandwidth than X58 on S1156, then that would make more sense, since X58 on S1366 supports triple-channel memory. | |
| ID: 1048927 · | |
Now I have an Asus P7P55 Pro motherboard with an i5 750 cpu, i7 cpus add some faster speed, greater bandwidth support, 4 virtual cpu cores and of course a bigger price, An i7 on X58 is no better than on 1156. If You like having the latest stuff, Try Gigabyte, Otherwise stick with Asus. Asus may not have the worlds best interactive support online, But their software support is nothing to sneeze at. I've never heard of X58 on an 1156 motherboard, As the chipset there on all of the 1156 ATX motherboards that I know of are of the P55 chipset. ____________ BSG Anthem My Facebook page | |
| ID: 1048930 · | |
Now I have an Asus P7P55 Pro motherboard with an i5 750 cpu, i7 cpus add some faster speed, greater bandwidth support, 4 virtual cpu cores and of course a bigger price, An i7 on X58 is no better than on 1156. If You like having the latest stuff, Try Gigabyte, Otherwise stick with Asus. Asus may not have the worlds best interactive support online, But their software support is nothing to sneeze at. Actually, you're right about that. They needed a new chipset for S1156 because they moved the PCI-e controller into the CPU die on the 1156's, whereas the X58 has the PCI-e controller built into the northbridge instead of the CPU. You're right on a technicality, but it still sounds funny to say that a chipset is faster than a socket, e.g. an X58 is faster than a Socket 1156. | |
| ID: 1048943 · | |
|
Does more mean faster? I was thinking of getting 4x gtx 480s but then they brought out the 580s. But i heard that the 580 is slower at seti then the 480.. so my question is what should I go with? | |
| ID: 1049008 · | |
|
Learn something new everyday! Thanks for educating me on the 1156 800 series I7's. I have only looked at the 900 series processors which explains my understanding of the chipsets. I assumed (I know you should never assume!) that the 1156's were reserved for the i5's. So thanks again for the link Brkovip. | |
| ID: 1049009 · | |
Does more mean faster? I was thinking of getting 4x gtx 480s but then they brought out the 580s. But i heard that the 580 is slower at seti then the 480.. so my question is what should I go with? someguyincanada: There is a review of the 480's vs 580's here: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/geforce-gtx-580-gf110-geforce-gtx-480,2781.html and another: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4008/nvidias-geforce-gtx-580/ And here is a graph of something us crunchers will like, look at the Folding graph: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4008/nvidias-geforce-gtx-580/16 The 580's run cooler and faster it seems. They are priced a bit higher then the 480's are currently. I know when I ran 2 X 480's in the top 2 slots the top 480 would hit 101C (thermal limit temp with stock cooling) pretty easy doing Furmark. When I put them in the 1st and 4th slot and used the new GPU cooler and have them clocked at 850/2000 (700/3696 stock) I hit 82C max in Furmark. If you are going to do 4 X 480's I would highly suggest water cooling or you will have a major temperature issue to contend with. ____________ | |
| ID: 1049038 · | |
|
Water cooling has some definite advantages. My two 480's are water cooled, and running at 860 MHz, with stock being 700 MHz. After 20 minutes of Furmark, I can barely hit 50°C. There is the downside of the extra up front cost of establishing a water cooled system. As a neat side effect, I can play any game out there with the graphics sliders up as high as they will go, without a single problem. | |
| ID: 1049054 · | |
- I think that 1200 watt power supply is a bit overkill.. As I have 2 GTX-260's and a 650 watt, is plenty. It also powers 3 hard drives, 2 DVD burners and multiple fans. And yes I am a gamer as well. | |
| ID: 1049180 · | |
- Well if he is thinking of expanding to 4 video cards then 1200 watts might not be enough. They proved with 4 X GTX480's that you need almost 1600 watts to run them. My 2 in Furmark have hit 905 watts so his estimates are not bad. I don't like running my power supplies at 100%, 75% is much easier on them and then you don't have to worry about loud fans as a nice side benefit. ____________ | |
| ID: 1049187 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : What to look for in motherbroads
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |