Major Increase in Credit

Message boards : Number crunching : Major Increase in Credit
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
W5DMG - Dave

Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 155
Credit: 33,162,251
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1045906 - Posted: 3 Nov 2010, 23:37:48 UTC

This past Monday my Total Credit was 8,326,478 and RAC was 12,444.16.
Today it went way up, Total Credit is 8,451,578 and RAC is 21,440.98.
I have looked at the before and after results at others in my Team and none had as large of increase.
Now do to this I don't feel quite so bad for the server outage.
ID: 1045906 · Report as offensive
-BeNt-
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 99
Posts: 1234
Credit: 10,116,112
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1045907 - Posted: 3 Nov 2010, 23:39:59 UTC - in response to Message 1045906.  

Yeah I saw about the same amount of change. However I credit it to the servers having all the results in the field coming in, none going out, and the validators having a good crack at doing their job. The point jumps will stop once your pending credits get dried out, and I don't think you will see another jump.
Traveling through space at ~67,000mph!
ID: 1045907 · Report as offensive
Profile Uli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 6 Feb 00
Posts: 10923
Credit: 5,996,015
RAC: 1
Germany
Message 1045923 - Posted: 4 Nov 2010, 1:28:11 UTC

See Matt's post in the Tech News.
Pluto will always be a planet to me.

Seti Ambassador
Not to late to order an Anni Shirt
ID: 1045923 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046244 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 15:21:04 UTC

I have received new wu's. I have a question for anyone. Did you notice that they are much longer to complete? About 3-4 times longer, so far.
ID: 1046244 · Report as offensive
Profile platium
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 10
Posts: 212
Credit: 262,426
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1046247 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 15:28:47 UTC

thats not so for me wu.s 2hrs10min about the same
ID: 1046247 · Report as offensive
Niteryder
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 22,663,988
RAC: 18
United States
Message 1046248 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 15:33:24 UTC - in response to Message 1046244.  

Yes, cuda tasks are taking longer. Cuda tasks from 26ja10 tape are taking about 3 times as much time.
ID: 1046248 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1046253 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 16:00:16 UTC - in response to Message 1046248.  

are you sure those CUDA WU's aren't VLAR WU's. I D/Led about 20 for my ATI GPU and they all were VLAR. Though the ATI GPU can crunch the VLAR in about 75 minutes on my 5850 as opposed to 6+ hours on a CUDA


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1046253 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046260 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 16:16:10 UTC

These particular ones are VLAR units, that will take about 10 hours vs. the previous 2.75 hours time. I will be crunching some that are not VLAR units soon, then I will know better. I hope the credit is also 3-4 times higher for these ones. I do not mind longer ones, less hassle when we have outages.
ID: 1046260 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046297 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 18:41:05 UTC - in response to Message 1046260.  

Since my older PC which used to take twice as long as the Quad to crunch one unit, I wonder if the Quad lost its opportunity to use the optimized version it used until the outage. Is there a way to find this out. 8-9+ hours seems way too long for wu on the Quad. It never happened before.
ID: 1046297 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 1046314 - Posted: 5 Nov 2010, 20:23:59 UTC - in response to Message 1046297.  

if that WU is a VLAR and its being crunched on a CUDA GPU expect very long times. since the "tasks" portion of the website has been disabled we aren't able to check on the WU's. Optimized apps won't turn off and the WU's aren't taking any longer than usual.


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 1046314 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046365 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 0:05:59 UTC - in response to Message 1046314.  

Thank you for the reply. I am looking at my Cuda and it will take about the same for a VLAR and regular unit to get done, nearly 8 hours. Quiet a shock.
ID: 1046365 · Report as offensive
Niteryder
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 64
Credit: 22,663,988
RAC: 18
United States
Message 1046368 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 0:21:51 UTC - in response to Message 1046365.  

Miklos,



I don't see a gpu to run cuda in your computers.


ID: 1046368 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046396 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 1:39:47 UTC - in response to Message 1046368.  

You are correct, but my wu's are still taking 8 hours as opposed to the previous 2.5-3.0.
ID: 1046396 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 1046446 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 8:30:10 UTC - in response to Message 1046396.  

You are correct, but my wu's are still taking 8 hours as opposed to the previous 2.5-3.0.

Look in task manager what process steals CPU time. Maybe you got some unwanted "guest" on your PC...
ID: 1046446 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046470 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 12:26:23 UTC - in response to Message 1046446.  

Thank you for the idea. I checked and it is 24-25% on each of the four cpu's.
ID: 1046470 · Report as offensive
Swibby Bear

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 01
Posts: 246
Credit: 7,945,093
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1046482 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 15:30:39 UTC

My somewhat older dual CPU (no CUDA) usully takes about 3 hours for a regular WU or a VLAR unit, about 1 to 1.5 for a "shortie". Now I have a batch that are each taking almost 6 hours, which is double what I have ever seen before. So you are not dreaming when you see the longer WUs.

I didn't get any of the super-long ones on my quad.
ID: 1046482 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1046499 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 16:56:59 UTC
Last modified: 6 Nov 2010, 16:57:37 UTC

Speaking only for the kitties.........

I was very grateful to see the credits pour into my account.
No rotten tomatoes here.
They were recognition for work done that was never properly credited for whatever reason.

Although it is hard to take that I can't be crunching Seti at the moment, it is a wonderful thing to see the database being whittled down somewhat.

I salute Eric and his minions (LOL) for making the hard choices that have had to make over the last few weeks.

I await the dawning of the new Seti with much anticipation.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1046499 · Report as offensive
Profile Gundolf Jahn

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 446,358
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 1046511 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 17:19:57 UTC - in response to Message 1046482.  

Are they really taking that long or are they only estimated to do so?

I too have some tasks that are estimated for double duration, but the "To completion" value shrinks rapidly.

Gruß,
Gundolf
ID: 1046511 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1046515 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 17:32:23 UTC - in response to Message 1046511.  

Are they really taking that long or are they only estimated to do so?

I too have some tasks that are estimated for double duration, but the "To completion" value shrinks rapidly.

Gruß,
Gundolf

Dunno, don't matter.

Whatever the 'estimate' is......as the saying goes, it is what it is.

And most Boinc versions are wonky in their use of it anyway.

Joe or Richard might give you a more defined answer.

But I have ignored it for years now.
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1046515 · Report as offensive
Miklos M.

Send message
Joined: 5 May 99
Posts: 955
Credit: 136,115,648
RAC: 73
Hungary
Message 1046531 - Posted: 6 Nov 2010, 18:12:17 UTC - in response to Message 1046511.  

Actual time elapsed is 8.5-9.5 hours on the quad and "only", 7 hours on the older computer. The older one used to take about 5-6 hours before the BIG OUTAGE. Looks like many of us are in the same "spaceship", so I will just have to wait and see if the credit increased too, in proportion to the longer time required to crunch.
ID: 1046531 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Major Increase in Credit


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.