Advice on graphic cards |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Advice on graphic cards
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
I am a recent convert to CUDA crunching having activated my ancient GF8800 in one of my machines. I am interested in adding a CUDA capable card to 2 more machines. I have no wish to spend a lot. So can anyone suggest a good card around £60-£100($90-$150). I have been looking at the GT210/220, are these worth it for CUDA? | |
| ID: 1030549 · | |
I am a recent convert to CUDA crunching having activated my ancient GF8800 in one of my machines. I am interested in adding a CUDA capable card to 2 more machines. I have no wish to spend a lot. So can anyone suggest a good card around £60-£100($90-$150). I have been looking at the GT210/220, are these worth it for CUDA? First.. check the power capabilites for your machines. I use a GT 220(came with the machine) because it has close to 1gig memory on it, very important to me in other-than-SETI video reasons. However it can be out crunched by a very economical 9600 GT with 512 MB. the 9800 GT might do even better for a very economical price. Of course the higher 2xx series (GTX 260-280) will absolutely out crunch any of these. Again, watch the power requirements. ____________ Janice | |
| ID: 1030570 · | |
|
I would go with a gtx 260 or a 460 when the prices come down. | |
| ID: 1030575 · | |
|
Or if you're limited to a 300W PSU, a GT240. | |
| ID: 1030581 · | |
|
Goto http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=61293 | |
| ID: 1030934 · | |
|
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=61134 | |
| ID: 1031085 · | |
For $150 you can probably get 2 of the 9800GT or GT 240...The 240 runs without extra power connectors too, under 75 Watts each so I'd call them a good choice...recent testing shows them faster than the 9800GT as well which takes closer to 100 Watts. Now about the 9800GT needing extra power connectors, this is wrong. I have 2x PCI-Express 2.0 (Low Power Edition) POV 9800GT's in 1 rig that do not have any extra power connections. They do however require a PCI-Express slot that is electrically 2.0 compliant, there are several brands out there that are of this type but they won't work in an older 1.0 electrically compliant PCI-Express slot so beware of this fact. Cheers. ____________ | |
| ID: 1031111 · | |
|
If you have low power GPUs, then you are right.. this are 'green edition' GPUs? So the clocks are lowered and power consumption is less. | |
| ID: 1031118 · | |
|
I have looked at all the useful info. Went to my local computer fair today and comparing price and other factors, went for a GT240 1GB ram at £65($100). Just set it up, seems to be about twice as fast as the CPU. | |
| ID: 1031140 · | |
|
I'd say that is a good choice...@Wiggo, does anyone still manufacture low power 9800 GTs? They used to be available, but I haven't seen anyone carrying them recently. | |
| ID: 1031877 · | |
|
I would go for GT240, if you don't want/have to change your PSU. | |
| ID: 1031882 · | |
|
My (manufacturer OCed GTX260-216) 4x EVGA running since ~ 1 1/2 years and 1x GIGABYTE over ~ 1/2 year 24/7 with auto fan control, reached ~ 85 °C and everything fine.. ;-D | |
| ID: 1031883 · | |
I have looked at all the useful info. Went to my local computer fair today and comparing price and other factors, went for a GT240 1GB ram at £65($100). Just set it up, seems to be about twice as fast as the CPU. LOL It seems your Celeron is to slow to feed the GT240. 10,000 seconds for a midrange WU - this GPU can do it in 1/10 of the time... Thats the longest time for a WU done by a GPU i ever heard. ;-) Helli ____________ | |
| ID: 1031888 · | |
I'd say that is a good choice...@Wiggo, does anyone still manufacture low power 9800 GTs? They used to be available, but I haven't seen anyone carrying them recently. Over here in Australia, through my suppliers, both Point Of View (POV) and Leadtek still have these cards available. Cheers. ____________ | |
| ID: 1031951 · | |
I have looked at all the useful info. Went to my local computer fair today and comparing price and other factors, went for a GT240 1GB ram at £65($100). Just set it up, seems to be about twice as fast as the CPU. You can insert URLs in messages? ;-D 'http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1701427180' Maybe the new CUDA app (x32f Preview, Cuda 3.0) is not well for GT240 GPUs? I guess, this AR should not longer than ~ 1,200 secs. Max ~ 1,800 secs. You used the Lunatics Installer V0.37? After - you made manually changes? I would test the app (V12) which was in V0.36 .. if this is faster, before I change the system.. ;-) Or original MB 6.09.. ____________ >Das Deutsche Cafe. The German Cafe.< | |
| ID: 1031968 · | |
I have looked at all the useful info. Went to my local computer fair today and comparing price and other factors, went for a GT240 1GB ram at £65($100). Just set it up, seems to be about twice as fast as the CPU. I have made no manual changes, I had noticed that it was taking too long, this has always been a slow machine, so I will remove the GT240 and look for a better home. Waste of £65. Still that's life. ____________ | |
| ID: 1031973 · | |
I have made no manual changes, I had noticed that it was taking too long, this has always been a slow machine, so I will remove the GT240 and look for a better home. Waste of £65. Still that's life. I hadn't guessed that the 'E3200' is so bad.. With a FSB of 800 MHz.. How is running your system RAM? There should be somewhere other the problem.. It's a WinXP OS, so not much load of unneeded stuff.. Before you change the home of the GT240, look with help of 'CPU-Z' if everthing is running like it should.. ..and after if - let run the stock 6.09 only for to compare.. ____________ >Das Deutsche Cafe. The German Cafe.< | |
| ID: 1031991 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Advice on graphic cards
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |