Message boards :
Number crunching :
NIVIDA 258.96 Release Available
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6652 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
I just loaded it up a few minutes ago, and can confirm I am pulling about 20 to 25 watts more with my two 480's. I don't see any problems, and it's too early to notice a speed difference. At least it wasn't on the EVGA 295. :) Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65737 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
I just loaded it up a few minutes ago, and can confirm I am pulling about 20 to 25 watts more with my two 480's. I don't see any problems, and it's too early to notice a speed difference. True, It's on a 4x pci-e slot(which could become a 2x slot If I put a card in one of the 1x slots, As the three extra pci-e slots, a 4x/2x slot and two 1x slots are hooked up to the P35 south bridge chip, the 16x pci-e slot is attached to the north bridge chip), So It didn't use nearly as much power. As It was a lack of power that made the #1 error here, Since the swap It's been purring like a hungry cat(Diesels I'm told sound like a cat that's purring, go figure). The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65737 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
I reinstalled 258.96 on XP x64 and It's working fine, So It was a psu problem, 1Kw fixed that. :o The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
hiamps Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 4292 Credit: 72,971,319 RAC: 0 |
Thought I would be lazy and not real familiar with Nvidia I tried just upgrading the drivers...Not good, was taking twice as long so I uninstalled and tried again and they work fine. I like ATI's software removal program. Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons... And no good credit hound! |
Dave Cummings Send message Joined: 16 May 09 Posts: 219 Credit: 1,193,729 RAC: 0 |
wow i was a little outta date - 195.xx - whoops! time to update drivers me thinks! |
Terror Australis Send message Joined: 14 Feb 04 Posts: 1817 Credit: 262,693,308 RAC: 44 |
wow i was a little outta date - 195.xx - whoops! time to update drivers me thinks! Don't be too quick, first impressions with the new driver on a GTX285 and GTS250 is that V191.07 is still the quickest. On the 250's it appears that 258.96 is 3 to 5 minutes slower on a 0.4 AR. This is with V2.3 dll's. Testing is still in progress T.A. |
Dave Cummings Send message Joined: 16 May 09 Posts: 219 Credit: 1,193,729 RAC: 0 |
I dont have any cuda tasks running atm so it's not too bad! |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65737 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
I've found I like 257.15 over both 257.21 and 258.96, Sure It uses a bit more cpu than gpu, But It allows the 4 GTX295 to feed My screen better while doing seti at the same time. Sure I know 257.15 is Beta, Big deal, It works for Me, So I don't care. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.