Fill 'er up (Jun 23 2010) |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Technical News : Fill 'er up (Jun 23 2010)
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
I've been working on Distributed.Net longer than I've been on Seti. They seem to now have a windows BOINC version of their project. They could always use some help. Isn't Distributed.Net a commercial (for profit) operation? ____________ | |
| ID: 1008275 · | |
|
Thanks Skildude. I think I have my cache set correctly but the WU never seem to last more than say three days (yes I have it set to ten). | |
| ID: 1008283 · | |
...From the looks of it we had something like a six drive simultaneous failure. Jeff and I beat on it for a while - we eventually assumed this was just a hardware blip, and the data was more or less intact on the drives, but the RAID metadata got a little screwed up. Long story short we were able to carefully bring down the RAID and recreate the meta devices from scratch with the data intact, and all was well.... how where you able to recreate the metadata? software raid or hardware raid? ____________ | |
| ID: 1008378 · | |
|
This year we did a donation challenge for our 10th year anniversary. I grossed $ 2,000 I'll talk to the crew of S@NL and maybe we can do this annually.. | |
| ID: 1008608 · | |
...I grossed $ 2,000... I => It grossed (my part wasn't thàt big ;)) The stats-export was there again, yay :) ____________ The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS | |
| ID: 1008765 · | |
|
I have been running the seti@home client for a while now and recently found that when I try to update the project, it keeps telling me either it cannot connect to server, or that there is no default internet connection. I dont use a proxy, I run the connection streight through my wireless connection to the router, then to the internet. Is this problem due to recent setbacks at your end or do I need to reconfigure anything at my end? please advise, Thanks | |
| ID: 1010341 · | |
|
Welcome Magpiie, | |
| ID: 1010347 · | |
|
thanks, glad to know it wasnt me, got over a dozen tasks needing upload. was beginning to think I had a problem at my end, good to know things will b up and running soon | |
| ID: 1010493 · | |
|
Sure wish we could fill em up.....Any explanation at all? | |
| ID: 1011000 · | |
|
This is BS! I don't know about the rest of the people running seti but I had quit, was done. I got a few emails from Seti and reconsidered and came back at Seti's request. So yes I do feel you owe me some kind of explanation as to what is going on and if you no longer want my help then I should be informed just as I was invited back. Treating people like this is Totally unprofessional, you asked some of us to come back we should be informed. I will also send a copy of this thru the beta email. | |
| ID: 1011240 · | |
This is BS! I don't know about the rest of the people running seti but I had quit, was done. I got a few emails from Seti and reconsidered and came back at Seti's request. So yes I do feel you owe me some kind of explanation as to what is going on and if you no longer want my help then I should be informed just as I was invited back. Treating people like this is Totally unprofessional, you asked some of us to come back we should be informed. I will also send a copy of this thru the beta email. I never cease to be amazed when RAC near 200 tells RAC 67K+ to go away, that they are not needed. Is it really them that is not needed? Obviously a bit of respect seems too much to ask from some... But I think we could do without abuse from the cheap seats. And when testing of untested software in live projects goes wrong, YES tempers flare. But large contributors of computer resources deserve some respect. They did it FOR the SETI project. Not to test BOINC for the most part. They are rightfully frustrated when they can not put that horsepower to the ground to benefit the project they invested time, and money to do. I do feel for the admins. Because I suspect the vast majority of the current problems are not hardware related. The current loss of redundancy on the Master/replica database.. no idea. But it should be interesting when we hear the cause... The all important "first error message" ____________ Janice | |
| ID: 1011310 · | |
|
There are perhaps 1000 big guns, maybe 100 of them post on the boards, mostly about their RAC or big purchases. When the project has problems they seem to be the only ones complaining about how they are being ill treated and are deserving of special treatment because they spent a lot of money on specialized equipment which they refuse to help other projects with. What they forget is that this was their choice, the project never requested it and has no duty to treat them differentially. They seem to forget that there are another 170000 smaller contributors that just do the bulk of the jobs as the project requested and you rarely hear them complain. I respect minorities, but I don't believe they should get preferential treatment no matter how loud they get. | |
| ID: 1011486 · | |
|
Hear Hear, and from someone who at one time was in the top 4000 RAC when the project was CPU only. | |
| ID: 1011716 · | |
|
Hiamps complaint seems to be that we are not getting enough information about what is happening, i.e. problems with the project. He was asked back to the project and now the "rules" have changed with little explanation--saying they are doing more science is not very informative. It shouldn't matter if he has a huge RAC or a more modest one, he appears to be asking for the project managers to please justify these changes in outage schedule, work rationing, etc. that affect us all. | |
| ID: 1011818 · | |
|
You make some good points here -- while I do have a large set of computers, all running BOINC, I do not rely on SETI being fully operational -- over the years (and I started doing SETI over 9 years ago with SETI classic), I've added projects and backed off on SETI. At the very least, it has reducedmy whine level here <smile>. There are perhaps 1000 big guns, maybe 100 of them post on the boards, mostly about their RAC or big purchases. When the project has problems they seem to be the only ones complaining about how they are being ill treated and are deserving of special treatment because they spent a lot of money on specialized equipment which they refuse to help other projects with. What they forget is that this was their choice, the project never requested it and has no duty to treat them differentially. They seem to forget that there are another 170000 smaller contributors that just do the bulk of the jobs as the project requested and you rarely hear them complain. I respect minorities, but I don't believe they should get preferential treatment no matter how loud they get. ____________ | |
| ID: 1016871 · | |
|
If it matters, I agree with BarryAZ and Hi-amps. And I also agree that for the good of the (seti) project, we slow pokes should control our egos (or ids, as the case may be) and keep the big guns very happy. It is only rational, unless you are here to relish in the ad hoc complexities and idiosyncracies of Boinc. | |
| ID: 1018139 · | |
|
Hi all, | |
| ID: 1019692 · | |
|
Howdy James, welcome to the forums, | |
| ID: 1019693 · | |
|
Thanks. I thought about posting there but i wasnt sure that was the right place to ask either. | |
| ID: 1019797 · | |
Message boards : Technical News : Fill 'er up (Jun 23 2010)
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |