error message

Message boards : Number crunching : error message
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1004954 - Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 0:31:41 UTC - in response to Message 1004949.  

are you sure that's not 124 validated tasks today?

Claggy

I'm pretty sure it wasn't meant to be. When we were testing this at Beta, and I had the Fermi going full tilt (they were shorties, and I did well over 1,000 tasks - plotted a credit graph for 1,150 validated, which you can't see because the site is down), several times I got baulked for lack of quota. I could see that 'Number of tasks today' remained static, while 'Max tasks per day' and 'Consecutive valid tasks' increased in step as wingmates checked in and my tasks validated. When 'Max tasks per day' rose above 'Number of tasks today', I could fetch work again, and 'Number of tasks today' rose by the number I received.
ID: 1004954 · Report as offensive
Profile bj

Send message
Joined: 11 Oct 00
Posts: 163
Credit: 50,429,507
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1004980 - Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 1:35:06 UTC - in response to Message 1004954.  

Just as on the other computers; if you look back, there have been numerous 'client detached' except that I did not do that. Haven't seen any new work on the 7 machine since the June 9 and the others that were detached; were not on the computers so was not able to detach them myself. I check them every night and see what has been up- and downloaded on all 5 computers. Why they did not show up and later detached; don't know the answer. Vista is the same. It did download some tasks after I unstalled and reinstall Boinc. Before June 9; it hasn't downloaded any work whereas the other three has until I disabled new work yesterday morning.

bj

ID: 1004980 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 1004983 - Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 1:39:17 UTC

This was an interesting one, particularly seeing as this computer isn't signed up to Beta

17/06/2010 10:31:26 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test You used the wrong URL for this project
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test The correct URL is http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/

17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Using the wrong URL can cause problems in some cases.
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test When convenient, detach this project, then reattach to http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Message from server: Can't find host record
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Message from server: Invalid or missing account key. To fix, detach and reattach to this project .
17/06/2010 10:42:12 SETI@home Beta Test work fetch suspended by user

All seems ok now though, but it made my eyebrows lift :-)

Brodo
ID: 1004983 · Report as offensive
Profile hiamps
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 May 99
Posts: 4292
Credit: 72,971,319
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1005026 - Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 3:02:27 UTC - in response to Message 1004983.  

This was an interesting one, particularly seeing as this computer isn't signed up to Beta

17/06/2010 10:31:26 SETI@home Requesting new tasks for CPU
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test You used the wrong URL for this project
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test The correct URL is http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/

17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Using the wrong URL can cause problems in some cases.
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test When convenient, detach this project, then reattach to http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/beta/
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Message from server: Can't find host record
17/06/2010 10:31:30 SETI@home Beta Test Message from server: Invalid or missing account key. To fix, detach and reattach to this project .
17/06/2010 10:42:12 SETI@home Beta Test work fetch suspended by user

All seems ok now though, but it made my eyebrows lift :-)

Brodo

I got same message and then a bit later downloaded work. Had me wondering also.
Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons...
And no good credit hound!
ID: 1005026 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN Ekky Ekky Ekky
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 May 99
Posts: 944
Credit: 52,956,491
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1005180 - Posted: 17 Jun 2010, 10:17:19 UTC - in response to Message 1005026.  

I got same message and then a bit later downloaded work. Had me wondering also.

Just had the same message here as well. Also not signed up to Beta. What gives? Do I actually have to do anything?
If I detach I shall lose the best part of 10 days' worth of cache and continuing work.
Expert guidance would be most welcome.


ID: 1005180 · Report as offensive
Profile Francesco Forti
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 May 00
Posts: 334
Credit: 204,421,005
RAC: 15
Switzerland
Message 1005604 - Posted: 18 Jun 2010, 7:33:48 UTC - in response to Message 1004948.  
Last modified: 18 Jun 2010, 7:34:22 UTC

It'll also give us the chance to see whether our "Number of tasks 'today'" resets at 07:00 UTC.

Yesterday, at 07:00 UTC, My host http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=1852935 received 14 WUs.
I have seen some increment in Max tasks per day and Consecutive valid tasks but the field Number of tasks today wasn't set to zero.
Haw can the new system work if the daily counter isn't reset?
At what time this reset is done?

FF
ID: 1005604 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1005753 - Posted: 18 Jun 2010, 15:44:08 UTC - in response to Message 1005604.  

It'll also give us the chance to see whether our "Number of tasks 'today'" resets at 07:00 UTC.

Yesterday, at 07:00 UTC, My host http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=1852935 received 14 WUs.
I have seen some increment in Max tasks per day and Consecutive valid tasks but the field Number of tasks today wasn't set to zero.
Haw can the new system work if the daily counter isn't reset?
At what time this reset is done?

FF

It is coded to be done when a host sends its first work request after midnight Berkeley time.
                                                                 Joe
ID: 1005753 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65745
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 1005779 - Posted: 18 Jun 2010, 16:52:33 UTC - in response to Message 1005753.  

It'll also give us the chance to see whether our "Number of tasks 'today'" resets at 07:00 UTC.

Yesterday, at 07:00 UTC, My host http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=1852935 received 14 WUs.
I have seen some increment in Max tasks per day and Consecutive valid tasks but the field Number of tasks today wasn't set to zero.
Haw can the new system work if the daily counter isn't reset?
At what time this reset is done?

FF

It is coded to be done when a host sends its first work request after midnight Berkeley time.
                                                                 Joe

And so far, It's Borked, As except for what might be reissued work, I can't get any work. As so far It looks like I'm being embargoed for no reason, As My AK app is to usable with seti @home, yet S@H says only stock is usable.

6/18/2010 9:50:01 AM SETI@home Message from server: Your app_info.xml file doesn't have a usable version of SETI@home Enhanced.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 1005779 · Report as offensive
Profile Area 51
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Jan 04
Posts: 965
Credit: 42,193,520
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1005800 - Posted: 18 Jun 2010, 17:36:42 UTC - in response to Message 1005753.  


It is coded to be done when a host sends its first work request after midnight Berkeley time.


But it looks like the reset is somewhat selective. Have a look at this host (mine):

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=5402676

I haven't used the stock client since this machine was built over a month ago.
The bottom two entries (anonymous entries) are valid for my setup, but didn't get zeroed overnight. Whether the top 2 did or not I couldn't say, since they were at zero yesterday........[/quote]
ID: 1005800 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1005848 - Posted: 18 Jun 2010, 19:38:35 UTC - in response to Message 1005800.  


It is coded to be done when a host sends its first work request after midnight Berkeley time.

But it looks like the reset is somewhat selective. Have a look at this host (mine):

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=5402676

I haven't used the stock client since this machine was built over a month ago.
The bottom two entries (anonymous entries) are valid for my setup, but didn't get zeroed overnight. Whether the top 2 did or not I couldn't say, since they were at zero yesterday........

There are certainly abundant examples in this forum of hosts for which the intended reset isn't working. There have also been posts showing it working for some, no viable theory yet on what makes the difference. I just hope the authors can figure it out and fix it reasonably soon.

At the tail end of your pending list there are ten more tasks your host did with stock 6.03 which should eventually add to the numbers shown for that app.
                                                               Joe
ID: 1005848 · Report as offensive
Profile Area 51
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 31 Jan 04
Posts: 965
Credit: 42,193,520
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 1005853 - Posted: 18 Jun 2010, 19:48:07 UTC - in response to Message 1005848.  

There are certainly abundant examples in this forum of hosts for which the intended reset isn't working. There have also been posts showing it working for some, no viable theory yet on what makes the difference. I just hope the authors can figure it out and fix it reasonably soon.


I just mention it as another example (sometimes it pays to have a variety of examples to help work out a solution). I have every confidence that things will eventually be sorted out, even if others don't!
ID: 1005853 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : error message


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.