Pending units |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : Pending units
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 8 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Looks like my pending units keep on piling up without credit. I wonder if something "broken" at SETI. | |
| ID: 995775 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 995826 · | |
|
I think the agreed position is that pendings in most accounts is at least three times RAC. | |
| ID: 995833 · | |
|
My ratio is up a bit in the last few days.... | |
| ID: 995843 · | |
I think the agreed position is that pendings in most accounts is at least three times RAC. Mine is at the moment 4,77744 * RAC | |
| ID: 995844 · | |
|
6.4 and change. I had one of the crunchers start failing on a graphics card so it's been offline occasionally and that's dropped the RAC. | |
| ID: 995876 · | |
|
My ratio used to be about 1-2 times RAC, now it is 4 times and climbing. | |
| ID: 995900 · | |
|
I'm currently at 3.966799507 (or thereabouts). For whatever reason, my RAC seems to be fluctuating somewhat lately; same (kind of) problem as Miklos; my Pendings seem to be piling up - maybe the others doing the same units are just taking longer? | |
| ID: 995922 · | |
|
I'm currently at 5.1350 | |
| ID: 995943 · | |
|
Yust one idea: | |
| ID: 995979 · | |
|
Another problem is people quitting and leaving WUs to sit until they time out. Whenever SETI has a problem we seem to lose a lot of people. A lot of my pending is from right around the time when there were problems. | |
| ID: 995981 · | |
|
Id have to say That I agree with Francesco that a lot of cruncehers upped their cache to ten days. Me I run a 0.75 day cache. Even my old P4 has 20 pendings. | |
| ID: 995988 · | |
|
Mine is 5.6809105 (x RAC) and a 3 day's cache, more then enough, especially with a few projects all together. | |
| ID: 995990 · | |
But if other crunchers autokills the same VLAR of the same Workunit, I'll wait a long time (in progress until deadline) untill someone doesn't autokill the VLAR that I have crunched at next reassignement. Why would you have to wait for a deadline? If a task is killed, it's reported back immediately and gets sent out again. The only thing you'll have to wait for is that it works its way up someone's (possibly ten-day) cache. Gruß, Gundolf ____________ Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz) SETI@home classic workunits 3,758 SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours | |
| ID: 996012 · | |
|
This discussion raises a question I have wondered about. What is the reason for GPU users to need/want an autokill feature for VLAR workunits? Unless these workunits don't function correctly with GPU crunchers for some reason, it seems to me a credit is a credit. Does it really make a difference between running a lot of low credit workunits as opposed fewer high credit workunits? And yes, I am a CPU cruncher only. | |
| ID: 996064 · | |
This discussion raises a question I have wondered about. What is the reason for GPU users to need/want an autokill feature for VLAR workunits? Unless these workunits don't function correctly with GPU crunchers for some reason, it seems to me a credit is a credit. Does it really make a difference between running a lot of low credit workunits as opposed fewer high credit workunits? And yes, I am a CPU cruncher only. Yes, credit is credit... but, in essence each SaH task pays a semi-fixed rate, and the VLAR tasks take 3-10 times longer than the other tasks, so, you get 1/3 to 1/10 the going rate per second by doing the VLAR on the GPU ... it is like using a sports car to haul a pile of dirt ... you can get there, but it would be faster with a truck ... So, by killing the long running tasks that take an hour to an hour and a half to run on a GPU and concentrating on those tasks that only take 5-10 minutes to run on the same GPU, work per hour (RAC is a crude measure of this) is much higher... we call that efficiency ... | |
| ID: 996069 · | |
Sure? You are right, and the system should act so but I'm not sure at all. I think that resend of killed task to other cruncher is done after the weekly maintenance. Can some one tell us haw the real procedure is? By the way: I see Results returned and awaiting validation 6,043,837 Results out in the field 6,284,723 Why are awaiting for validation? ____________ | |
| ID: 996105 · | |
When a reissue is created it goes at the end of the "Results ready to send" queue, so for this project under normal conditions is sent out within a few hours. By the way: I see Mostly because the wingmate's result has not yet been received. That's the total "pending", some may be inconclusives too. Joe | |
| ID: 996147 · | |
Ok, I have seen now that you are right. After 1 hour the task was reassigned to a new user. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=610657396
Ok, clear! But why it's so high? Weeks ago it wasn't so. Francesco ____________ | |
| ID: 996190 · | |
...But why it's so high? Weeks ago it wasn't so. probably because I started doing SaH work again ... I broke every last little thing ... | |
| ID: 996197 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : Pending units
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |