GPU crunching and memory (amount & type) |
![]() |
| log in |
Questions and Answers : GPU applications : GPU crunching and memory (amount & type)
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
I am thinking of buying an GT 240, it's power consumption is quite low (max 70 Watt, so that I won't need to buy an new PSU). | |
| ID: 986051 · | |
|
gddr5 is much faster than the gddr3. Also if you are only running the video card for seti it wont matter much between the 512mb and 1gb of ram. It might affect your performance in high end games though. | |
| ID: 986117 · | |
|
Do you really think it'll affect SETI? I doubt it, I figure 1-5 seconds to load into memory regardless of what type of memory it is, and 15min-hours to crunch depending on the card. | |
| ID: 986250 · | |
|
yes the Gddr5 is much faster than Gddr3 otherwise people would quickly figure out that they overpaid for something that isnt better than previous generations of GPU's | |
| ID: 986263 · | |
yes the Gddr5 is much faster than Gddr3 otherwise people would quickly figure out that they overpaid for something that isnt better than previous generations of GPU's That may be true of ATI on Collatz. But OTOH I can underclock the memory on my GTX295 by 15% without any noticeable effect on crunch time here on Seti@Home. Just my 0.02. F. ____________ | |
| ID: 986280 · | |
|
Seti/CUDA doesnt rely on the Memory speed IIRC it relies on the Shaders to process work which is completely independent of the memory speeds | |
| ID: 986330 · | |
Seti/CUDA doesnt rely on the Memory speed IIRC it relies on the Shaders to process work which is completely independent of the memory speeds Exactly so. And the OP was asking if it was worth spending extra for faster memory for SETI... F. ____________ | |
| ID: 986406 · | |
|
Ehm.. in other words, purly speaking in SETI-performance, it will not be worth the money.. (spending on more/faster memory)? | |
| ID: 986941 · | |
|
IMHO, it only makes a difference, if the app fit's completely in GPU-Memory and doesn't need to 'swap'with 'system-memory' or wait on the CPU. | |
| ID: 987082 · | |
|
on Milkyway my ATI 5850 gets around 180k a day. this is so much better than even a Nvidia 295. The reason? ATI's full utilization of the GPU memory. | |
| ID: 987097 · | |
|
We seem to go a bit off topic (but I get the distinct impression the difference is delegable for SETI@HOME, therefore the cheapest would suffice..?) | |
| ID: 987121 · | |
|
the easiest way to tell is to look at the top machines that are running seti. It will tell you which GPU is the fastest. | |
| ID: 987129 · | |
|
It is quite difficult to correctly figure out what the performance of a GPU is via the 'top machines'.. | |
| ID: 987496 · | |
Questions and Answers : GPU applications : GPU crunching and memory (amount & type)
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |