Lesson #1, Never use the word "fixed" (March 17, 2010) |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Technical News : Lesson #1, Never use the word "fixed" (March 17, 2010)
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Those entries are available in original form there --> http://seti.berkeley.edu/blog In the 21st century, this is publishing. ____________ | |
| ID: 985520 · | |
I prefer to think that they know what they are doing (that has been proven often enough!) and that it is off for a good reason. F. ____________ | |
| ID: 985536 · | |
The replica has been decomissioned. They split the Multibeam and Astropulse tables into 2 separate DB servers. | |
| ID: 985543 · | |
|
So, does that mean we will no longer have access to our state of processing of tasks? | |
| ID: 985558 · | |
|
IF there will be no replica, then somebody needs to point all database inquiries to the master, because right now, they are not getting current data. | |
| ID: 985561 · | |
IF there will be no replica, then somebody needs to point all database inquiries to the master, because right now, they are not getting current data. The DB's that's been split into two are the SETI@home science database, and Astropulse science database. Those have nothing to do with the BOINC master database and the BOINC replica database, when it comes to our ability to see our work. That's still the job of BOINC replica database which since yesterdays outage has been offline. Sten-Arne | |
| ID: 985564 · | |
|
So, who needs to be told that the Replica is no longer being updated? | |
| ID: 985577 · | |
So, who needs to be told that the Replica is no longer being updated? We have never had, nor do we need access to the science database. Our purpose as volunteers is to populate the science database. BOINC isn't designed or intended to hold completed results. As for the rest: No one needs to be told. It isn't that important. You're making a huge assumption when you say "can no longer be updated" and it is in fact somewhat normal for the replica to be down for a while. The skepticism behind the "and when? (if at all)" is discouraging, given the fact that the folks running the project have done a superb job of doing huge science with little money and "hand-me-down" hardware for a decade. ____________ | |
| ID: 985580 · | |
So, who needs to be told that the Replica is no longer being updated? As I said, the replica you're talking about isn't the one that "updates you". That's been done, and will still afaik be done through the BOINC replica database jocelyn, which is offline for the moment, but is expected to go online any time now. Almost every Tuesday outage the BOINC replica database jocelyn, is put offline until it's synced again with the master DB. Don't confuse the different DB's with each other. The 2 "new" databases doesn't now or before when they were one, have anything to do with you seeing your results. Sten-arne | |
| ID: 985582 · | |
|
Thanks, Sten-arne, for repeating explanation which i did not quite understand the first time. | |
| ID: 985588 · | |
Ned. Keith, I didn't mean to offend you as being "unimportant" and definitely not "dismissive" but was hoping to get across the idea that there is a track record here. We as a society have come to a point where we expect and demand instant fixes. We assume when it isn't fixed right now that the only reason it isn't fixed is because it has been discontinued. In your message, you said "is there a reason that it can no longer be updated?" and that seems to assume that it is a permanent condition, and we're going to have to live with no statistics, no progress. "if at all" seems to suggest that this is a permanent condition. My observation isn't clever or knowledgeable. I observe:
| |
| ID: 985594 · | |
|
You forgot to mention things you don't want to happen happen almost instantaneously! :-) | |
| ID: 985599 · | |
|
The replica database is back online and catching up to the master as we speak. | |
| ID: 985601 · | |
You forgot to mention things you don't want to happen happen almost instantaneously! :-) ... and so many other things that follow from Murphy's law. ____________ | |
| ID: 985607 · | |
|
Houston we have a problem???? | |
| ID: 986794 · | |
|
... We also appear to be having a problem or two with the "science status" page: the "overflow rate" has been at 0.0% for a couple of days every time I looked at it, (highly unlikely to be true) and the link to Arecibo shows "Values as of 38760 minutes ago... so that's apparently down, too | |
| ID: 986847 · | |
|
Juhuuuu Berkeley, | |
| ID: 988618 · | |
|
Any news on how long till its fixed. Just want to know when my missing 21 tasks will be checked in. "My results" say 34 in progress but actually only 13 left to do then I'm out of work. | |
| ID: 988637 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 988643 · | |
|
Eric | |
| ID: 988666 · | |
Message boards : Technical News : Lesson #1, Never use the word "fixed" (March 17, 2010)
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |