Hay! that was fun!!


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Hay! that was fun!!

1 · 2 · Next
Author Message
EdwardPF
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 99
Posts: 228
Credit: 42,155,989
RAC: 51,016
United States
Message 973206 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:34:24 UTC

I just hit update and everything got sent ... is "it" fixed??or was I just lucky?

Ed F

Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 4812
Credit: 71,594,015
RAC: 8,948
Australia
Message 973210 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:37:47 UTC - in response to Message 973206.

Uploading with audible whooshing sounds here ... I'd love to know what uncorked that particular blockage ...
____________
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change."
Charles Darwin

nemesis
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 12 Oct 99
Posts: 1408
Credit: 35,074,350
RAC: 0
Message 973212 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:40:30 UTC

high fiber diet?

____________

Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 4812
Credit: 71,594,015
RAC: 8,948
Australia
Message 973213 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:41:35 UTC - in response to Message 973212.

high fiber diet?

That's some serious bran flakes...
____________
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change."
Charles Darwin

Profile Bill Walker
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 3247
Credit: 1,829,012
RAC: 219
Canada
Message 973214 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:43:04 UTC

Simliar result from the Great White North a few minutes ago. Was down to 4 WUs to run, with enough pending uploads to kill any downloads, when it suddenly all went "whoosh". Now have about 3 days worth of work.

Cricket hasn't shown any great change, so I put this down to random luck. whatever, I'll take it!
____________

ThJansen
Send message
Joined: 8 Aug 99
Posts: 1
Credit: 201,980
RAC: 74
Germany
Message 973216 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:44:29 UTC

Jepp, it seems to run again. I hope for longer!
____________

Profile perryjay
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3377
Credit: 13,690,396
RAC: 12,278
United States
Message 973218 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:46:59 UTC - in response to Message 973216.

Well, it took all my uploads but only gave me 3 GPU tasks, that should be good for about an hour. Hopefully it will be my turn again before then. :-)
____________


PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC

EdwardPF
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 26 Jul 99
Posts: 228
Credit: 42,155,989
RAC: 51,016
United States
Message 973222 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:49:40 UTC - in response to Message 973218.
Last modified: 22 Feb 2010, 20:48:14 UTC

get 'em while they are hot!! only 62750 WU's at 19:30 and "Master database queries/second" is up to 528 ... if the bottleneck is purged the in-flow/out-flow will stripe the DB clean!!

Ed F
[edit]
at 19:50 we have Master database queries/second at 877 and 53250 WU's left
at 20:10 we have Master database queries/second at 966 and 20131 WU's left
at 20:20 we have Master database queries/second at 917 and 05689 WU's left
at 20:40 we have Master database queries/second at 957 and 07585 WU's left the splitters are holding!!
[/edit]

Richard Haselgrove
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 8275
Credit: 44,947,355
RAC: 13,542
United Kingdom
Message 973223 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:49:52 UTC

Cricket graph now showing 28 Mbit/sec uploads - that's more like it.

We'll probably have some genuine good old-fashioned congestion for a while, but that's a much better sort of problem to have.

This looks like one of those 'lightbulb' moments - simple solution that's been staring you in the face all this time, but you just weren't looking at it. I wonder what it was.

Profile Zeus Fab3r
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 Jan 01
Posts: 640
Credit: 79,705,129
RAC: 80,981
Serbia
Message 973224 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 19:50:26 UTC - in response to Message 973214.
Last modified: 22 Feb 2010, 19:52:07 UTC

Cricket hasn't shown any great change, so I put this down to random luck. whatever, I'll take it!


It's definitely showing now... 28 MB/s.
...no it's record breaking 30.36 and rising...
I wonder why :)
____________

Who the hell is General Failure and why is he reading my harddisk?¿

Profile kararom
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 10 Dec 08
Posts: 20
Credit: 37,235,605
RAC: 2,039
Russia
Message 973245 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 20:12:38 UTC - in response to Message 973224.

All my WU upload!!!... :)

SETI UP!!!

Profile Dave Cummings
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 16 May 09
Posts: 204
Credit: 912,052
RAC: 70
United Kingdom
Message 973250 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 20:23:17 UTC - in response to Message 973245.

mine have but they all have come backj with

1512566714 570613191 10 Feb 2010 18:01:58 UTC 22 Feb 2010 19:30:46 UTC Validate error 9,240.25 262.20 113.18 --- SETI@home Enhanced v6.08 (cuda)

Profile dcappello
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 260
Credit: 170,963,022
RAC: 1,504
United States
Message 973350 - Posted: 22 Feb 2010, 23:56:04 UTC

heavy sigh.... Internet access OK...... no such luck here, I only got one machine to report and I have a stash of WUs....
____________

Profile Bill Walker
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 3247
Credit: 1,829,012
RAC: 219
Canada
Message 973368 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 0:39:55 UTC

Just a theory, or perhaps a model to help us have a bit of patience....

Looks like the SETI crew or somebody has cleared whatever was preventing the servers from running at their maximum capacity. Cricket shows the bandwidth is saturated, with several days of pent up demand. A small percentage of us get through, and then things go "whoosh". The rest of the time the servers don't answer your call, and it looks like it has for the last week - but for different reasons.

As those who get through stop calling in so frequently, the rest of the calls will get a chance. but it will take time, probably till after the scheduled outrage tomorrow, for all calls to be answered.
____________

Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 3570
Credit: 98,004,902
RAC: 78,905
United States
Message 973370 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 0:45:10 UTC - in response to Message 973368.

Just a theory, or perhaps a model to help us have a bit of patience....

Looks like the SETI crew or somebody has cleared whatever was preventing the servers from running at their maximum capacity. Cricket shows the bandwidth is saturated, with several days of pent up demand. A small percentage of us get through, and then things go "whoosh". The rest of the time the servers don't answer your call, and it looks like it has for the last week - but for different reasons.

As those who get through stop calling in so frequently, the rest of the calls will get a chance. but it will take time, probably till after the scheduled outrage tomorrow, for all calls to be answered.

90Mb out & 30Mb in right now... wait... *does some maths*... well it's close enough to 100Mbs I suppose.
____________
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours

Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!

1mp0£173
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 973374 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 0:49:01 UTC - in response to Message 973368.

Just a theory, or perhaps a model to help us have a bit of patience....

Looks like the SETI crew or somebody has cleared whatever was preventing the servers from running at their maximum capacity. Cricket shows the bandwidth is saturated, with several days of pent up demand. A small percentage of us get through, and then things go "whoosh". The rest of the time the servers don't answer your call, and it looks like it has for the last week - but for different reasons.

As those who get through stop calling in so frequently, the rest of the calls will get a chance. but it will take time, probably till after the scheduled outrage tomorrow, for all calls to be answered.

Exactly right.
____________

W5DMG - Dave
Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 155
Credit: 30,345,494
RAC: 19,790
United States
Message 973387 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 2:22:23 UTC

Nice to see my 430 WU's finally go up. :)

Profile perryjay
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3377
Credit: 13,690,396
RAC: 12,278
United States
Message 973392 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 2:35:22 UTC

Ok, I did my part to help. The downloads got away from me and before I knew it I had around 100 new tasks. I set no new tasks so you guys can have whatever comes down the pike for the next few days. :-)
____________


PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC

Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3232
Credit: 31,585,541
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 973490 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 11:01:44 UTC - in response to Message 973392.

Hi, pinged the path to boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu but results are the same as
before the 'congestion'!

Busy tracing route to boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.18]
via maximaal 30 hops:
0 Leisure [192.168.2.2]
1 192.168.2.1
2 195.190.249.32
3 iawxsrt-rt2-bb21-ge-3-1-0.wxs.nl [213.75.64.145]
4 ams-ix.he.net [195.69.145.150]
5 10gigabitethernet4-1.core1.nyc4.he.net [216.66.24.153]
6 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.chi1.he.net [72.52.92.102]
7 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.sjc2.he.net [72.52.92.73]
8 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.pao1.he.net [72.52.92.69]
9 64.71.140.42
10 208.68.243.254
11 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.18]

Statistics being calculated for 275 second's....
From source/endpoint. And connection points.
Hop RTT Verl./verzonden Verloren/verz. Adres
0 Leisure [192.168.2.2]
0/ 100 = 0% |
1 7ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 192.168.2.1
0/ 100 = 0% |
2 --- 100/ 100 =100% 100/ 100 =100% 195.190.249.32
0/ 100 = 0% |
3 35ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% iawxsrt-rt2-bb21-ge-3-1-0.wxs.nl [213.75.64.145]
0/ 100 = 0% |
4 33ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% ams-ix.he.net [195.69.145.150]
0/ 100 = 0% |
5 122ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10gigabitethernet4-1.core1.nyc4.he.net [216.66.24.153]
0/ 100 = 0% |
6 145ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10gigabitethernet1-2.core1.chi1.he.net [72.52.92.102]
0/ 100 = 0% |
7 198ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.sjc2.he.net [72.52.92.73]
0/ 100 = 0% |
8 199ms 0/ 100 = 0% 0/ 100 = 0% 10gigabitethernet3-2.core1.pao1.he.net [72.52.92.69]
1/ 100 = 1% |
9 199ms 1/ 100 = 1% 0/ 100 = 0% 64.71.140.42
10/ 100 = 10% |
10 266ms 11/ 100 = 11% 0/ 100 = 0% 208.68.243.254
6/ 100 = 6% |
11 268ms 17/ 100 = 17% 0/ 100 = 0% boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu [208.68.240.18]

Trace is completed

Don't see any difference, so this is not a reliable way to check to connection, IMHO.

____________


Knight Who Says Ni N!, OUT numbered.................

Richard Haselgrove
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 8275
Credit: 44,947,355
RAC: 13,542
United Kingdom
Message 973493 - Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 11:10:36 UTC - in response to Message 973490.

Don't see any difference, so this is not a reliable way to check to connection, IMHO.

Doesn't surprise me, but thanks for checking.

1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Hay! that was fun!!

Copyright © 2014 University of California