Message boards :
Politics :
Obama to kill Ares program
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Matthew S. McCleary Send message Joined: 9 Sep 99 Posts: 121 Credit: 2,288,242 RAC: 0 |
Obama apparently plans to kill the Ares rocket program, the replacement for the Space Shuttle, as part of an attempt to fix the budget. When the White House releases its budget proposal Monday, there will be no money for the Constellation program that was to return humans to the moon by 2020. The Ares I rocket that was to replace the space shuttle to ferry humans to space will be gone, along with money for the Ares V cargo rocket that was to launch the fuel and supplies needed to return to the moon. There will be no lunar landers, no moon bases. "We certainly don't need to go back to the moon," one administration official said. Bend over, here comes the change... Why is it that it never seems to matter whether we have the money when war funding is the question -- just tack it on to the deficit, what the hell -- but when we need to balance the budget space programs are the first to go? Until now I was on the fence, but this puts me squarely in the don't-like-Obama camp. |
Gecko Send message Joined: 17 Nov 99 Posts: 454 Credit: 6,946,910 RAC: 47 |
Obama apparently plans to kill the Ares rocket program, the replacement for the Space Shuttle, as part of an attempt to fix the budget. No prouder a moment for our socialist president than to force America to hitch-hike rides on Russian and likely in future, Chinese spacecraft. No offense pointed towards either, since both have sustainable, & working human delivery vehicles. Russia continued to invest and improve Soyuz all these years as an efficient delivery system. Wish we had done same w/ Saturn V........ |
hiamps Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 4292 Credit: 72,971,319 RAC: 0 |
Seems as though we are slowly becoming a second rate country and the sheeple don't see it or don't care... Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons... And no good credit hound! |
Gary Charpentier Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30640 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 |
Obama apparently plans to kill the Ares rocket program, the replacement for the Space Shuttle, as part of an attempt to fix the budget. That's a nice jobs program. How's that CHANGE working out for you? |
Robert Waite Send message Joined: 23 Oct 07 Posts: 2417 Credit: 18,192,122 RAC: 59 |
I gave up on him when it became clear to me that there was no way universal single payer health care was going to be brought to the citizens of the US. Obama is not a socialist, nor is he even a left leaning politician. He's just another corporatist that came to power with the promise of change. Personally, my choice for president was Nader but I'm not an American voter. I do not fight fascists because I think I can win. I fight them because they are fascists. Chris Hedges A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr. |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20267 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
Obama apparently plans to kill the Ares rocket program, the replacement for the Space Shuttle, as part of an attempt to fix the budget. If you read the rest of the article, it looks to be a very sensible move. Various groups have been cautioning for a long time that the moon is of no advantage for getting to Mars or elsewhere in the solar system, and could actually prove to be more of an expensive technological quagmire rather than a help. After a decade of procrastinations and holidaying on the ranch of the Bush years, it looks like Obama is the straight leadership needed to get America moving oncemore. Regards, Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
why are we blaming this president for decades of waste and mismanagement from congress? this is a symptom of a larger problem. Have you rode on an interstate lately. Seems we can build new highways but cant afford the uptake. In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
Why have people fallen out with manned space travel? Do you American's no longer have any pride in having the ability to land on the moon, and potentially Mars? I find it very sad that Constellation is most likely being cancelled. I don't like the idea of hitching a ride on a Russian Soyuz spacecraft (both questionable safety records and it is the Russians we're talking about) and commercial space travel just looks sad... a government cannot get man into space but a small start-up company can?! Pathetic. I'd say continue onwards with the Constellation program - $6 billion and 7 years has already been spent on it! Give NASA a much needed boost in funding, ergo speed up the progress of construction. Keep the ISS running until 2020, then service the Hubble Space Telescope one final time in the late 2010's. Off to the moon by 2020, and off to Mars in 2025-30. After servicing the Hubble get on the construction of the 16m Advanced Technology Large Aperture Space Telescope (AT-LAST), which depends and is designed around the possibility of using the Ares V for launch, then we have a true successor to Hubble. Landing in Apophis in 2029 would be pretty cool as well. I'm 34 now. I do hope I will see a manned Mars mission in my lifetime. Not a chance if Constellation is canceled though... - Luke. |
Matthew S. McCleary Send message Joined: 9 Sep 99 Posts: 121 Credit: 2,288,242 RAC: 0 |
That's exactly it. I'm 30 so not far behind. Constellation is my generation's Apollo, and Mars my generation's Moon. Obama has just killed one of my dreams. |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20267 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
... Constellation is my generation's Apollo, and Mars my generation's Moon. Obama has just killed one of my dreams. From that article: Instead, according to White House insiders, agency officials, industry executives and congressional sources familiar with Obama's plans, NASA will look at developing a "heavy-lift" rocket that one day will take humans and robots to explore beyond low-Earth orbit. That day will be years away. The White House will direct NASA to concentrate on Earth-science projects -- principally, researching and monitoring climate change -- and on a new technology research and development program designed to someday enable human exploration of asteroids and the inner solar system. Looks like Obama is looking beyond the moon. We've been there, done it. The moon is an old goal. Why repeat it? Especially, why repeat past glory when there is far greater interest beyond? Note that the moon is a gravitational hole that is in the wrong place to go further. A much much better "staging post" is to go to the Lagrange point beyond the moon. From there you can 'cheaply' manoeuvre to anywhere else in the solar system. A bit like a 'star gate'. Much more 'interesting' is to develop and learn from the ISS and thence onto other parts of the solar system. At least Obama is MAINTAINING THE FUNDING for NASA. He's not redirecting NASA for the sake of any spending cuts for that case... I think he's taken some good advice for the sake of much faster and more worthwhile progress. (I wonder if Bush was dreaming of "Space Cowboys" when he misdirected various of NASA's efforts...) The Earth sciences and climate change stuff is also very important. There's a lot of ground to catch up on from the Bush blinkeredness. Keep searchin', Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
Gecko Send message Joined: 17 Nov 99 Posts: 454 Credit: 6,946,910 RAC: 47 |
Let's look closer. If Kennedy had laid out the same deliverables as this, the moon NEVER would have happened in 69'. There's no substance to these words, and NASA will find there to be NO FUNDING from Washington to support this directive. He's pushing off details and funding to future administrations that will be LONG after his. This isn't an inspiring Vision, just empty words from a President that doesn't have any plan and is too narcissistic to admit it. And above is merely my opinion. Don't let me dissuade anyone from theirs. :>) |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
If we had but a fraction of the moneys that have bean spent on destroying this world an our fellow mankind in the last century or so........ We could have funded and completed most of the initiatives that our kind and loving master has promised us and shall never fulfill. What could we do with he funds we are now spending in Afghanistan? Billions of dollars spent to kill others instead of saving our own or shoring up our planet's ecosystem. Because of what?? They threaten us unless we leave them alone. Read that again........they threaten us unless we leave them alone. Y'all know what it's about.........the powers that be...... 1. Really think that they know what they are doing.........NOT so onto number 2. 2. They really are a threat............ NOT.....unless we provoke them, which we continually do. 3. They are protecting our sources of energy (oil)....fk that.......do you think the producers would have the life they live if they didn't have a place to send it????? Why do you think OPEC exists???? They live in fear that if we do not continue to buy their source of energy at the prices they extract from us, they shall cease to exist. It is their source of power.........do away with our dependence, and we shall own them all!!!!! 4. We can spend billions killing other peoples and other cultures, but seem to find a problem with exploring the outer limits of space. For what end? To find more peoples and cultures which we can attack.........see the military complex discussions elsewhere. It's about money and where it is channeled.......nothing more. I stand by my JFK theories......he was gonna try to reign this thing in........and that's why he was killed. This is a sad thing, my Seti friends.....a sad thing. The only moon that Obama is looking beyond is his own. The one behind his ass. Not ours. And you wanna talk global warming??????? Take all the combustables consumed by every war in the last 100 years...... They could have probably supplied the energy need of the whole nation every day since we began. Talk about a place to start. We could have done this years ago, and long ago ruled our world. With no dependence on others to serve our world. Except for that 'military industrial complex' thingy that keeps poking it's prod into our butt. I know there were wars worth fighting, and I respect those that did on our behalf.......and I will never diss the men who died fighting them. But that time has long gone........there were not WMD's in Irag. And I doubt Iran has them yet.... And would not produce them if we did not give them reason to.......this is the cold war starting alllllllll over again. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
This was a problem back in MY time........ You young pups have no idea......and many others here are older and have seen much more than I.....saying that your daddy did won't cut it..... Mine did not, and I acknowledge that. There were sacrifices made for which I did not pay for. But my grandparents did. Get the government back in order, or they shall order you. Have you never heard Dylan's 'Masters of War'?......no, it was not a Black Sabbath tune.........written by him back in '63......before many of you were borne into this world.....so you should pay attention to your elders..... Listen now.... Come you masters of war You that build all the guns You that build the death planes You that build the big bombs You that hide behind walls You that hide behind desks I just want you to know I can see through your masks You that never done nothin' But build to destroy You play with my world Like it's your little toy You put a gun in my hand And you hide from my eyes And you turn and run farther When the fast bullets fly Like Judas of old You lie and deceive A world war can be won You want me to believe But I see through your eyes And I see through your brain Like I see through the water That runs down my drain You fasten the triggers For the others to fire Then you set back and watch When the death count gets higher You hide in your mansion As young people's blood Flows out of their bodies And is buried in the mud You've thrown the worst fear That can ever be hurled Fear to bring children Into the world For threatening my baby Unborn and unnamed You ain't worth the blood That runs in your veins How much do I know To talk out of turn You might say that I'm young You might say I'm unlearned But there's one thing I know Though I'm younger than you Even Jesus would never Forgive what you do Let me ask you one question Is your money that good Will it buy you forgiveness Do you think that it could I think you will find When your death takes its toll All the money you made Will never buy back your soul And I hope that you die And your death'll come soon I will follow your casket In the pale afternoon And I'll watch while you're lowered Down to your deathbed And I'll stand o'er your grave 'Til I'm sure that you're dead Yeah......'63.... Masters.....NOT... "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Robert Waite Send message Joined: 23 Oct 07 Posts: 2417 Credit: 18,192,122 RAC: 59 |
I've had those lyrics tacked up on my locker door at work for two years. Just under the Three Stooges picture. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd3YIwxk--0 I do not fight fascists because I think I can win. I fight them because they are fascists. Chris Hedges A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I've had those lyrics tacked up on my locker door at work for two years. Most excellent.....thank you very much. I have a copy of 'Freewheelin' that I bought shortly after it's release. A fine Dylan album. One of my favorites. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Tom95134 Send message Joined: 27 Nov 01 Posts: 216 Credit: 3,790,200 RAC: 0 |
Why have people fallen out with manned space travel? #1. Building boost vehicles costs too much. #2. Building boost vehicles costs too much. #3. Building boost vehicles costs too much. At some point it becomes logical to allow others to do the "heavy lifting" and simply pay for a ride. There are many other areas of scientific research that the money needed to develop a new orbital boost vehicle can be used. As far as science goes, we have learned much more from the unmanned exploration than can be learned from a manned mission. as far as the Moon goes, the only thing it really offers is the visual clarity of an observation platform without an atmosphere. As to the Space Station, it needs to continue and clearly President Obama has made a commitment to continue funding that so it will be viable until 2020. Frankly, I expect that there will be an increase in the number of private companies entering into the business of operating orbital and sub-orbital vehicles. Why not FedEx or the like? They would have some ability to garner an ROI on their investments. Yes, it sounds crazy but then that's what everybody said about FedEx when they started business, i.e., "Who needs a package on the other coast over night?" I would also expect that you will see some interest in a private corporation taking over operation of the Space Station before it is slated for retirement. The only question there will be if it is realistic to try to refurbish the existing platform or simply use it as a place to house the people that will be needed to build a new space station. Maybe one underwritten by "Best Western"? What we saw in 2001 might have been prescient except for the fact that PanAm (PAA) has gone out of business (FedEx didn't exist) and Hilton is no longer the largest hotel chain. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.