graphic card

Author	Message
[AF>france>pas-de-calais]symaski62 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Aug 05 Posts: 258 Credit: 100,548 RAC: 0	Message 963536 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 17:26:43 UTC cufft.dll <= ?!?!? ID: 963536 ·

Sutaru Tsureku Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5	Message 963538 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 17:31:02 UTC - in response to Message 963536. Last modified: 15 Jan 2010, 17:34:22 UTC cufft.dll <= ?!?!? [img] http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/3500/seti5.jpg [/img]_disabled You let run stock/original SETI@home. No opt. apps. That could be the reason. Strange, why you calculate with MB_6.08_CUDA(2.2)_app and not with the new MB_6.09_CUDA2(.)3_app? ____________ [Optimized project applications, for to increase your PC performance (double RAC)!][Overview of abbreviations, which are used often in forum and their meaning.] ID: 963538 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 963539 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 17:36:32 UTC - in response to Message 963538. cufft.dll <= ?!?!? [img] http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/3500/seti5.jpg [/img]_disabled You let run stock/original SETI@home. No opt. apps. That could be the reason. Strange, why you calculate with MB_6.08_CUDA(2.2)_app and not with the new MB_6.09_CUDA2(.)3_app? Because his 8400GS cuda card only has 256MB VRAM? I believe the (cuda23) plan_class has a higher minimum RAM threshhold. ID: 963539 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874	Message 963541 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 17:38:04 UTC - in response to Message 963532. BTW. Why we have so much threads about the same topic? Because so many people prefer to ask questions, rather than work out answers for themselves? ID: 963541 ·

Frosted Send message Joined: 11 Jul 99 Posts: 83 Credit: 3,898,641 RAC: 0	Message 963554 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 18:24:10 UTC - in response to Message 963536. Last modified: 15 Jan 2010, 18:25:15 UTC symaski62 wrote: cufft.dll <= ?!?!? http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/3500/seti5.jpg If I'm reading your question correctly... The version info for cufft.dll is not showing because it is older (2.1 or older I think) I'm pretty sure 2.2 and higher show the version correctly. ID: 963554 ·

[AF>france>pas-de-calais]symaski62 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Aug 05 Posts: 258 Credit: 100,548 RAC: 0	Message 963556 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 18:58:39 UTC - in response to Message 963554. symaski62 wrote: cufft.dll <= ?!?!? http://img686.imageshack.us/img686/3500/seti5.jpg If I'm reading your question correctly... The version info for cufft.dll is not showing because it is older (2.1 or older I think) I'm pretty sure 2.2 and higher show the version correctly. cufft.dll => 380 Ko (389,120 octets) fichier.dll end :) ID: 963556 ·

Frosted Send message Joined: 11 Jul 99 Posts: 83 Credit: 3,898,641 RAC: 0	Message 963561 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 19:10:06 UTC - in response to Message 963556. Last modified: 15 Jan 2010, 19:13:04 UTC 8.23 Mo fin :p ID: 963561 ·

[AF>france>pas-de-calais]symaski62 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Aug 05 Posts: 258 Credit: 100,548 RAC: 0	Message 963599 - Posted: 15 Jan 2010, 21:07:19 UTC cufft.dll <= 380 Ko & CUDA 2.0 Revision 379, 380.0 kB (checked in by korpela, 1 year ago) Initial check in of CUDA code. To be merged with main code branch... cufft.dll <= 8.23Mo & CUDA 2.3 Revision 607, 8.2 MB (checked in by korpela, 5 months ago) Checkin of CUDA 2.3 setiathome_enhanced (6.09) client modifications... ^^ google chercher "cufft.dll" hum ID: 963599 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.