Cool (Dec 22 2009)


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Technical News : Cool (Dec 22 2009)

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author Message
Profile [seti.international] Dirk SadowskiProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7091
Credit: 60,509,623
RAC: 18,311
Germany
Message 959525 - Posted: 30 Dec 2009, 13:11:05 UTC
Last modified: 30 Dec 2009, 13:12:48 UTC


Matt, you had let run the 'validate error make again well script', right?
Thanks!
All my 'validate error's are away.

Nearly all.. one is still in the overview.
[http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=487098725]

I don't know why. It's an old (reported 7 Aug 2009 15:10:25 UTC) but to now not two similar results found.
I have with my 'validate error' the same result as the last 'well' result of 21 Dec 2009 18:03:51 UTC.
Both results have the same output of:
Spike count: 1
Pulse count: 0
Triplet count: 0
Gaussian count: 0


Two more WUs were sent out for to compare the result.

____________
BR

SETI@home Needs your Help ... $10 & U get a Star!

Team seti.international

Das Deutsche Cafe. The German Cafe.

Iztok s52d (and friends)
Send message
Joined: 12 Jan 01
Posts: 119
Credit: 176,827,690
RAC: 30,327
Slovenia
Message 959539 - Posted: 30 Dec 2009, 14:47:41 UTC - in response to Message 959242.

[quote][quote]Thanks for the tip - the validate errors are fixed now.

- Matt


Hi!
Some 630 WUs are invalid for me.
Small hope: after they go out again (400 000 ready to be send),
validator might validate them.

BR, HNY
Iztok



Thanks! (all validated, even some old ones)

Happy upgrade to Y2010,

Iztok


Profile perryjay
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3377
Credit: 15,656,851
RAC: 12,145
United States
Message 959542 - Posted: 30 Dec 2009, 15:19:29 UTC

All chugging along nicely here. Good to see those not needed tags replace the validate errors and credit granted. Great work from all involved in the recovery.

Thanks to all the crew at SETI!! Hope the next one goes a bit smoother now that you know what to expect. :-)
____________


PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC

Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 384
Credit: 36,814,680
RAC: 18,056
Netherlands
Message 959557 - Posted: 30 Dec 2009, 16:32:54 UTC

I don't know if there can be done anything about it, but it might (at least) be informational:

The download of the stats-exports is extremely troublesome.. Yesterday I managed to download them manually (automatically failed every time).

Today the download is even more troublesome, I'm at manual attempt number three (and now also trying to get it to my home-computer, but not much better..)

____________
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS

Glenn savill
Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 2364
Credit: 3,305,030
RAC: 33,842
Australia
Message 959607 - Posted: 30 Dec 2009, 22:06:05 UTC - in response to Message 959557.

There seems to be a problem Huston for the last week the site has shit itself can't download units can't upload can't even check the web site out . It was working yesterday but today haveing troubble . When seti site worked yesterday Einstein didn't got a message from browser saying the problem at your end the firewall was blocking me . Was lucky the message board part of site opened but couldn't get home page or my account keep getting no connection error if i analyse connection i then get the message firewall blocking me at your end please fix problems as it is affecting the other progects two
____________

Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 384
Credit: 36,814,680
RAC: 18,056
Netherlands
Message 959629 - Posted: 30 Dec 2009, 23:57:20 UTC - in response to Message 959557.

The latest stats-export was automatically downloaded "as it used to go" => fast! :D

So whatever was wrong/less good is great again :D

I don't know if there can be done anything about it, but it might (at least) be informational:

The download of the stats-exports is extremely troublesome.. Yesterday I managed to download them manually (automatically failed every time).

Today the download is even more troublesome, I'm at manual attempt number three (and now also trying to get it to my home-computer, but not much better..)


____________
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS

Profile JulieProject donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 21039
Credit: 3,779,749
RAC: 5,985
Belgium
Message 959646 - Posted: 31 Dec 2009, 1:11:14 UTC
Last modified: 31 Dec 2009, 1:11:33 UTC

A happy 2010 for the staff at Seti@home!
____________


rOZZ

Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 384
Credit: 36,814,680
RAC: 18,056
Netherlands
Message 960561 - Posted: 3 Jan 2010, 13:42:16 UTC

FYI:

I built a "safeguard" in our S@H-stats scripts, when the '<total_credit>' is the same (or very marginally more) it will not download the *.gz files.

The latest export contains exactly the same '<total_credit>' as the previous one, therefore the data in the *.gz files is most like the same as the previous export, so no new export(?).

PS: if this is not the place to mention these things I apologise (if so, where would be a better place?)

Best regards,

Eesger
____________
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS

John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24542
Credit: 522,145
RAC: 85
United States
Message 960690 - Posted: 3 Jan 2010, 19:45:54 UTC - in response to Message 960561.

FYI:

I built a "safeguard" in our S@H-stats scripts, when the '<total_credit>' is the same (or very marginally more) it will not download the *.gz files.

The latest export contains exactly the same '<total_credit>' as the previous one, therefore the data in the *.gz files is most like the same as the previous export, so no new export(?).

PS: if this is not the place to mention these things I apologise (if so, where would be a better place?)

Best regards,

Eesger

I believe that you can also check the timestamp of the file before you download it. If the timestamp is the same, there has been no update.
____________


BOINC WIKI

Profile S@NL - Eesger - www.knoop.nl
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 01
Posts: 384
Credit: 36,814,680
RAC: 18,056
Netherlands
Message 960868 - Posted: 5 Jan 2010, 9:44:01 UTC - in response to Message 960690.

True, I do that as well.. but it "says" it's new (22:27:06 02-01-2010) but the TC is the same as the previous export (00:26:59 02-01-2010)

PS: date/time = GMT

I believe that you can also check the timestamp of the file before you download it. If the timestamp is the same, there has been no update.


____________
The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS

John McLeod VII
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 24542
Credit: 522,145
RAC: 85
United States
Message 961086 - Posted: 6 Jan 2010, 3:11:10 UTC - in response to Message 960868.

True, I do that as well.. but it "says" it's new (22:27:06 02-01-2010) but the TC is the same as the previous export (00:26:59 02-01-2010)

PS: date/time = GMT

I believe that you can also check the timestamp of the file before you download it. If the timestamp is the same, there has been no update.


OK. That makes sense. It could be that the replica database did not do anything in the time between, but was made active again and noticed the time difference and cut a new version of the XML.
____________


BOINC WIKI

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Technical News : Cool (Dec 22 2009)

Copyright © 2014 University of California