What can we learn from the results of seti@home to date? |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : What can we learn from the results of seti@home to date?
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
What conclusions can we draw from the seti@home data so far processed? Can we use the (negative) data so far generated to put a cap on the likely number of detectable ET's. | |
| ID: 947598 · | |
|
you would also have to assume that any civilization out there would be on a planet that is spinning. thus making it ever so more difficult to detect signals unless the signal is specifically sent in our direction. Also note that other solar systems don't flow on our plane. so the chance that a stray signal from a spinning planet that isn't on our plane and have the signal pointed at us at the precise moment that the telescope is searching for it is pretty low. So all we can do is keep searching. It is very likely that there is life out there. its less likely that it is intelligent and even less liekly that it would be in our neighborhood (within 50 light years) where we would be able to detect a signal. | |
| ID: 947620 · | |
|
Given. But we're not talking about the actual number of civilisations but the number of "detectable" civilisations, where by detectable I mean those sending recievable signals/messages. | |
| ID: 960916 · | |
|
I recall someone telling us that signals sent out would most likely have to be less than 50 Light years away worst case 100 years. So we are pretty limited on our reach for signals. | |
| ID: 960934 · | |
|
Absolutely nothing. All the data analyzed so far has gone into a data base where it sits waiting to be further analyzed. | |
| ID: 962650 · | |
Absolutely nothing. All the data analyzed so far has gone into a data base where it sits waiting to be further analyzed. True, the public ntpckr isn't up. The private ntpckr is and has checked all the data. Well until the recent database corruption which might also explain the public ntpckr being offline. The absence of signals does tell us something. It tells us intelligent life isn't ubiquitous. That alone should tell us to preserve what we have. For distributed computing it has been a great success. How to get; a whole lot of people to donate massive amounts of computer time, buy their own hardware and even get them to rewrite the sofware so it becomes more efficient all for free. Sorry not quite, we do get a whole bunch of meaningless credits to keep it competative. If all this computing results in some thing beneficial to mankind, they will gladly sell it to you for big bucks. Snort. Unless you aren't talking about SETI. Who ever came up with the idea should get the Noble Prize for "The Greatest Con Job Ever". Don't let the door hit you on the way out. ____________ | |
| ID: 962665 · | |
|
Presented by Seth Shostak, SETI Institute. | |
| ID: 963098 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Science : What can we learn from the results of seti@home to date?
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |