Lunar water seen!

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Lunar water seen!
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 947253 - Posted: 14 Nov 2009, 20:06:19 UTC

After what at first appeared to the world's press as a damp squib due to there being no "Armageddon" type explosion and plume, LCROSS did indeed hit water:

LCROSS Impact Data Indicates Water on Moon


Keep searchin',
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 947253 · Report as offensive
Profile Johnney Guinness
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 06
Posts: 3093
Credit: 2,652,287
RAC: 0
Ireland
Message 947498 - Posted: 15 Nov 2009, 21:42:23 UTC
Last modified: 15 Nov 2009, 21:46:20 UTC

It was good news Martin,
There was a terrible feeling of let-down with the main event. The whole world tuned in to watch and nobody saw anything.

So this news was a real vindication for the LCROSS science team, and a victory for humanity as a whole. The fact that there is water on the moon actually gives mankind a future on the moon. Before this, the moon was a dead dry place.

They also mentioned that they also saw much more than just water. They hesitated to say what else they found, but they did seem very excited about possible other trace elements they saw. Wonder what else they found, they say there will be another press release in a few weeks.

Thanks for the story Martin,
John.
ID: 947498 · Report as offensive
Profile Norman Copeland
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 09
Posts: 1503
Credit: 143,499
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 947507 - Posted: 15 Nov 2009, 23:31:00 UTC

I wonder what sort of effect it would have on the enhabitant's of the moon if water was extracted from sodium traces that appear to have been missing from the emmission's of the star {our star sol}.

Just a thought.
ID: 947507 · Report as offensive
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 1383
Credit: 2,098,506
RAC: 5
Message 947617 - Posted: 16 Nov 2009, 15:06:32 UTC

Preliminary examination of the spectrometer data suggests that, other than water, any of the following substances may have been present at the LCROSS impact site: Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Methane, Ethanol, Methanol. see Sky and Telescope article: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/69991547.html
ID: 947617 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 947618 - Posted: 16 Nov 2009, 15:10:43 UTC - in response to Message 947507.  
Last modified: 17 Nov 2009, 2:57:21 UTC

I wonder what sort of effect it would have on the enhabitant's of the moon if water was extracted from sodium traces that appear to have been missing from the emmission's of the star {our star sol}.

Just a thought.

Huh? please explain how water from the moon has anything to do with missing sodium emmissions. I can not connect the dots and it appears that these 2 things are mutually exclusive.

And how would one extract sodium traces that are already missing.


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 947618 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 947619 - Posted: 16 Nov 2009, 15:13:36 UTC - in response to Message 947507.  

I wonder what sort of effect it would have on the enhabitant's of the moon if water was extracted from sodium traces that appear to have been missing from the emmission's of the star {our star sol}.

Sorry, I don't think anyone has yet devised a gibberish quotient for quantitative analysis.

Just a thought.

Just an unconnected response.


Keep searchin',
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 947619 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 947621 - Posted: 16 Nov 2009, 15:20:13 UTC - in response to Message 947507.  

I wonder...

Norman,

Wow!

Never knew that you got your name in print at MIT!!!

Methodology for the Exploration of Evolutionary Programming

Congratulations on the seminal publication!


Keep searchin',
Martin


See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 947621 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 947624 - Posted: 16 Nov 2009, 15:24:37 UTC - in response to Message 947621.  

Many information theorists would agree that, had it not been for active networks, the exploration of Smalltalk might never have occurred. Given the current status of large-scale information, computational biologists famously desire the investigation of the memory bus. Similarly, given the current status of classical technology, theorists predictably desire the analysis of online algorithms. Clearly, kernels and probabilistic modalities do not necessarily obviate the need for the construction of DHTs.


sounds like his work


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 947624 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 947648 - Posted: 16 Nov 2009, 17:38:08 UTC - in response to Message 947624.  

Many information theorists would agree that, had it not been for active networks, the exploration of Smalltalk might never have occurred. Given the current status of large-scale information, computational biologists famously desire the investigation of the memory bus. Similarly, given the current status of classical technology, theorists predictably desire the analysis of online algorithms. Clearly, kernels and probabilistic modalities do not necessarily obviate the need for the construction of DHTs.


sounds like his work

You must admit, that lot is rather creative! :-)

However, I think we'd better leave discussion of evolutionary networks and SmallTalk to another thread before we all dive into a headful of RSI! :-p


Keep searchin',
Martin


See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 947648 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20260
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 947847 - Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 11:48:12 UTC - in response to Message 947617.  
Last modified: 17 Nov 2009, 11:49:21 UTC

Preliminary examination of the spectrometer data suggests that, other than water, any of the following substances may have been present at the LCROSS impact site: Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Monoxide, Methane, Ethanol, Methanol. see Sky and Telescope article: http://www.skyandtelescope.com/news/69991547.html

What is more interesting is whether there may be a chemical record of the early Earth frozen in the moon dust below the surface away from the sun's influence...

So... Did the Centaur rocket stage excavate deeply enough into the moon's surface to find more than just the hoped for water ice?...

Keep searchin',
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 947847 · Report as offensive
Michael Watson

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 1383
Credit: 2,098,506
RAC: 5
Message 947889 - Posted: 17 Nov 2009, 15:23:56 UTC - in response to Message 947847.  
Last modified: 17 Nov 2009, 15:26:18 UTC

Its not clear how, or if, the different substances are layered in the Lunar soil. That determination may need something more systematic than an impact explosion, it seems. The same forces that drove the substances into the ground-- everything from micrometeorites churning up the soil over billions of years to asteroid and comet impacts may have mixed things pretty well. The crater is supposed to be some 4 or 5 meters deep. Granting the possibility of some layering, I wonder if they have enough data to do a time based study of which substances were detected in which order. If there is any discernible variation, this could give some idea of the depth at which various materials lie. The first thrown out by the impact would be from nearest the surface, the next detected, directly below it, and so on. The possibility of doing this kind of study would depend on the number of spectrograms made in succession, very close on after the impact.
ID: 947889 · Report as offensive
Profile Norman Copeland
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 09
Posts: 1503
Credit: 143,499
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 948156 - Posted: 19 Nov 2009, 1:04:12 UTC
Last modified: 19 Nov 2009, 1:11:01 UTC

Japan's moon satelite...

JAXA = Japanese aerospace exploration agency

Observation's of below the moon surface from the Japanese space agencie's lunar satelite...
ID: 948156 · Report as offensive

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Lunar water seen!


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.