Oopsie (Oct 06 2009) |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Technical News : Oopsie (Oct 06 2009)
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Quick post-weekly-outage wrapup: everything went fine, albeit a little slow given recent events. The replica recovery is going on now. Hopefully it'll continue along safely overnight and we can turn the replica back on sometime tomorrow. | |
| ID: 938002 · | |
|
The weekend outage is finally repaired. | |
| ID: 938008 · | |
|
^U^ | |
| ID: 938026 · | |
|
I start sweating if my mail box says "You have 5 new messages". | |
| ID: 938035 · | |
|
Thanks Matt, that explains a few things. | |
| ID: 938041 · | |
Quick post-weekly-outage wrapup: everything went fine, albeit a little slow given recent events. The replica recovery is going on now. Hopefully it'll continue along safely overnight and we can turn the replica back on sometime tomorrow. THAT explains the delayed emails to the BOINC Help Desk and the S@H moderators email list. ____________ BOINC WIKI | |
| ID: 938042 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 938053 · | |
... If you get to the bottom of that page, you discover that several older years have already been split off into separate archives. Being on dial-up, I'd also find it easier to handle if it were split again. But I'd put it in the "nice to have" class, something for a day when more important work is blocked for some reason. Joe | |
| ID: 938068 · | |
|
Thank you to the people came up to the lab to try and the servers working again. Am I correct in saying that all the fresh tapes full of data that are left have been loaded into the splitters? Thanks for reading | |
| ID: 938085 · | |
|
'We're talking about 35,000 e-mails'and every one or most will have to be checked,at least the message titles to ensure that nothing important is missed | |
| ID: 938126 · | |
|
I was taking a look at http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_status.html & noticed that a few ap & mb splitters are disabled. I also noticed that there's a new Program running on bruno called Vote_Monitor. Does anyone know what the vote monitor does? I couldn't ever imagine e-mails in my in box were the e-mails telling Matt Jeff & Eric that the the servers were looking up? | |
| ID: 938184 · | |
|
We have a lot of splitters listed in our back-end configuration file - more than we usually need (or can handle) - which is why several are disabled at any given time. If we need to start more (or less), it's an easy toggle within the config file. I was taking a look at http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_status.html & noticed that a few ap & mb splitters are disabled. I also noticed that there's a new Program running on bruno called Vote_Monitor. Does anyone know what the vote monitor does? I couldn't ever imagine e-mails in my in box were the e-mails telling Matt Jeff & Eric that the the servers were looking up? - Matt ____________ -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude | |
| ID: 938187 · | |
The vote monitor is a script that regularly check the state of and handles elections for user banishment on the forums. Cool, how many fake logons under spoofed IP & MACs must I create to ban someone ? j/k ;-) | |
| ID: 938192 · | |
The vote monitor is a script that regularly check the state of and handles elections for user banishment on the forums. LOL It won't work though. In order to vote you must have a bit set on your account indicating that you are a moderator for SETI@Home. You'd have to hack the server where user accounts are stored, find the appropriate flag and set it. Even then, the Admin(s) can override a ban vote and reverse it immediately, then quickly remove the flagged bit from the offending account. At that point, there's a strong chance that the account with the bit set would be reviewed and possibly perma-banned for such an infraction. ____________ | |
| ID: 938209 · | |
|
Thx for the tech-splanation. That said, you have software & a thread running just for ban concensus !! ;-) | |
| ID: 938224 · | |
Thx for the tech-splanation. That said, you have software & a thread running just for ban concensus !! ;-) If there are no active bans pending, then the process doesn't use any CPU cycles, thus negating a need to turn it off and create another upload_server instance. ;-) ____________ | |
| ID: 938225 · | |
Message boards : Technical News : Oopsie (Oct 06 2009)
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |