Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
Solaris 10
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
Does anyone know of any good how to guides on setting up boinc / seti on solaris 10, I have downloaded the setiathome-6.03.i386-pc-solaris from www.dotsch.de Yes I did have a google about for this but everything seems to point back to the seti pages. Regards |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
There is a readme in the tar.gz, in .\opt\boinc\doc, called install.seti But else, if you don't know how to open that, here it is: SETI@HOME Enhanced Multibeam install and update README for Solaris x86 |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
thanks for the quick reply, I should have been a little more clear in what help I was needing. Given I just installed solaris yesterday I am new with it. I need to actually install boinc. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I need to actually install boinc. Yes? So same way. Lars adds how-to's in the package you downloaded. Did you get the 6.2.19.tar.gz? Open the tar file inside, then go .\opt\boinc\docs and open install Although he may want to add that outside the package, if you don't know how to use gunzip and tar. ;-) So here goes, again: boinc and seti@home quick install guide |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for that the readme I saw in the package didnt have all those steps, or I could just be being blind :D Regards |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
got it all sorted, aside form an issue with it not picking up app_info.xml which I managed to sort out. Sorry for sounding like a total newbie, I run seti on several BSD based machines I was expecting solaris to be similar in the inital setup .. you know make install etc. Hence why I thought I was missing some instructions somewhere. |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
Well I thought all was well, but having read there was a shortage of workunits I was waiting for the system to get its first work. It downloaded two workunits but they failed with a computational error 09/09/2009 11:50:46 SETI@home Starting task 25au09aa.19030.14796.7.10.148_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 603 09/09/2009 11:50:47 SETI@home Computation for task 25au09aa.19030.14796.7.10.148_1 finished 09/09/2009 11:50:47 SETI@home Output file 25au09aa.19030.14796.7.10.148_1_0 for task 25au09aa.19030.14796.7.10.148_1 absent 09/09/2009 11:50:54 SETI@home Finished download of 25au09aa.19030.14796.7.10.111 09/09/2009 11:50:54 SETI@home [error] Checksum or signature error for 25au09aa.19030.14796.7.10.111 09/09/2009 11:51:34 SETI@home Started download of 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198 09/09/2009 11:51:43 SETI@home Finished download of 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198 09/09/2009 11:51:44 SETI@home Starting 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198_1 09/09/2009 11:51:44 SETI@home Starting task 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 603 09/09/2009 11:51:45 SETI@home Computation for task 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198_1 finished 09/09/2009 11:51:45 SETI@home Output file 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198_1_0 for task 24au09ab.24094.13978.8.10.198_1 absent Anyone got any ideas ? |
Gundolf Jahn Send message Joined: 19 Sep 00 Posts: 3184 Credit: 446,358 RAC: 0 |
Is "Solaris 10" the same as "SunOS 5.10"? If not, which is the host you are speaking of? If it is this one, it has downloaded 75 tasks, some with download errors, most with computing errors. Those I checked finished with exit code 193. See the BOINC FAQ Service. Did you check that the BOINC user has write access to the BOINC data directory? Gruß, Gundolf Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz) SETI@home classic workunits 3,758 SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
Is "Solaris 10" the same as "SunOS 5.10"? If not, which is the host you are speaking of? Solaris 2.x, 7...10 (aka 2.7 to 2.10) are reported as SunOS 5.x in the uname command. Solaris 1 is SunOS 4.x and X11. |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
Yes I did mean solaris 5.10, according to the FAQ it is suggesting a memory fault, I have double checked the read write access on the folder. So I will go run memtest and see what that comes up with. |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
well memtest gave the machine a clean bill of health, when I get some time I will remove boinc and try it again just in case I messed something up |
Tangerineboy Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 33 Credit: 1,511,482 RAC: 0 |
Well I have not had the time to look at seti on this machine till today. I removed all traces of seti and boinc from the machine and re-downloaded and re-installed the apps. 28-Sep-2009 22:29:22 [SETI@home] Started download of 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8 28-Sep-2009 22:29:27 [SETI@home] Finished download of 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8 28-Sep-2009 22:29:28 [SETI@home] Starting 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8_0 28-Sep-2009 22:29:28 [SETI@home] Starting task 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 603 SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Exiting... 28-Sep-2009 22:29:29 [SETI@home] Computation for task 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8_0 finished 28-Sep-2009 22:29:29 [SETI@home] Output file 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8_0_0 for task 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8_0 absent That seems to be all I can make it do, there was one strange thing that I noticed and I am not sure if it is significant or not After extracting the setiathome-6.03.10 archive there was another directory in the projects folder called setiathome.berekeley.edu as well as setiathome.berkeley.edu Now the folder that has the correct spelling did not have an app_info.xml or the setiathome binary I copied both to the folder with the correct spelling, boinc now starts finding the app_info.xml, but it did say in the logs that is was trying to delete setiathome-6.03.i386-pc.solaris file in use. Now it starts without any errors but every WU fails to complete, I have checked and double checked permissions to the folders and they are correct seti user and seti group own /opt/boinc and all folders below. |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
28-Sep-2009 22:29:28 [SETI@home] Starting task 28au09ab.18269.9888.9.10.8_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 603 I am not shure, if this is a appliation related problem, and a recompile of the BOINC client ot the SETI application is required. What Solaris release do you have installed (uname -a) ? What patchlevel does the system have ? Could you please try to copy the setiathome binary to a temporary directory, download the test WU from www.dotsch.de/seti/work_unit.sah and copy it to the same directory. Change into this directory, and start the setiathome binary with ./setiathome-.... Does it abort immediatly ? You can abort this after about 1 or 2 minutes. If there is no crash. But if it crashes, start it with "truss ./setiathome-... > truss_seti.log 2>&1". After it has finsished, you can mail me the file truss_seti.log to seti_boinc at dotsch dot de. Could you please also genereate some debug output from you BOINC installation for me. Change to the directory of your BOINC installation, start the BOINC client with "truss ./boinc_client > truss_boinc.log 2>&1" and mail me the file. Btw. what's happen, if you start the BOINC client with "./boinc_client -no_gui_rpc" ? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.