s@h campus fibre x10 data rate...!

Author	Message
ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7212 Credit: 3,703,622 RAC: 662	Message 927695 - Posted: 21 Aug 2009, 13:02:32 UTC Last modified: 21 Aug 2009, 13:06:47 UTC
Could this little device be the solution to the s@h campus fibre woes? No new fibre required, likely no new routers or any other equipment required. Easy. Too good to be true? See: D-Link 1000BaseT to 1000BaseSX Multimode Media Converter $351 1000BASE-T Gigabit Twisted-pair to 1000BASE-SX Gigabit Fiber Multi-mode Fiber (550m, SC) Media Converter Module • UTP to Multimode Fibre Media Converter • SC Fibre connector • Includes Power Supply for standalone use DMC-700SC D-Link 1000BaseT to 1000BaseLX Singlemode Media Converter $1,117 1000BASE-T Gigabit Twisted-pair to 1000BASE-LX Gigabit Fiber Single-mode Fiber (10km, SC) Media Converter Module. • UTP to Singlemode Fibre Media Converter • SC Fibre connector • Distance up to 10km • Includes Power Supply for standalone use DMC-810SC One of them at each end gets you 1Gbit/s over 2km of multimode fibre. That looks to be a drop-in replacement and an awful lot less than $100k! (s@h has a 1Gbit/s internet link. However, the campus fibre connection to that link only runs at 100Mbit/s at present...) Happy crunchin', Martin Also posted on the Technical forum ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 927695 ·

DJStarfox Send message Joined: 23 May 01 Posts: 1040 Credit: 486,408 RAC: 78	Message 927707 - Posted: 21 Aug 2009, 13:56:51 UTC - in response to Message 927695.
You should PM Matt and see if he responds.
ID: 927707 ·

Fred J. Verster Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Apr 04 Posts: 3232 Credit: 31,585,541 RAC: 0	Message 927798 - Posted: 21 Aug 2009, 20:00:46 UTC - in response to Message 927707.
Hi, sounds almost too good to be true, but it's a hell of a lot cheaper, then the 'old' solution. ____________ Knight Who Says Ni N!, OUT numbered.................
ID: 927798 ·

Ianab Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Jun 08 Posts: 568 Credit: 9,406,456 RAC: 13,731	Message 927829 - Posted: 21 Aug 2009, 21:49:38 UTC - in response to Message 927798.
Problem is it's not so simple. The infrastructure is run by the University IT department and they have their own standards for routers. They will have management systems for monitoring and programing the dozens of routers around the campus. They will not just plug in any random boxes and hope they work. In a small organisation, where you are THE I.T. manager or consultant, you can just go and buy the boxes you need and set them up. In a larger organisation, life is not so easy. The Dilbert comic strips pretty much explain how it all works. Ian
ID: 927829 ·

1mp0£173 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0	Message 927855 - Posted: 21 Aug 2009, 23:12:52 UTC - in response to Message 927829.
The Dilbert comic strips pretty much explain how it all works. Dilbert explains pretty much how everything works. ____________
ID: 927855 ·

VBobier Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 41284 Credit: 32,369,259 RAC: 5,467	Message 927858 - Posted: 21 Aug 2009, 23:22:37 UTC - in response to Message 927855.
The Dilbert comic strips pretty much explain how it all works. Dilbert explains pretty much how everything works. Or as It doesn't work as the case may be. :D ____________ BSG Anthem My Facebook page
ID: 927858 ·

ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7212 Credit: 3,703,622 RAC: 662	Message 928050 - Posted: 22 Aug 2009, 17:55:58 UTC - in response to Message 927829.
Problem is it's not so simple. The infrastructure is run by the University IT department... Indeed so. And hence part of the excitement of this solution is that those little boxes may well just be a "transparent" inline solution for the existing equipment. That is very likely so at the SSL end with their Gbit routers. Also, there have been previous hints that there is a Gbit route possible for the Hurricane end... The real excitement is the claim made for the multimode fibre adapter!... Whatever... It's a possible neat low cost solution if it fits into the overall picture. Happy crunchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 928050 ·

Matthew S. McCleary Send message Joined: 9 Sep 99 Posts: 121 Credit: 2,288,242 RAC: 0	Message 928118 - Posted: 23 Aug 2009, 2:10:43 UTC - in response to Message 928050.
And hence part of the excitement of this solution is that those little boxes may well just be a "transparent" inline solution for the existing equipment. That's precisely what these are. Simple electical-to-optical conversion boxes. As long as the fibre in place supports the data rate (and most likely it does) it's unlikely Berkeley IT would have a legitimate objection, especially if they were given a chance to vet the installation beforehand. Go for it, I say. Of course, we'll run into the same old problem -- you throw more disk space or bandwidth at the users, and pretty soon the need grows to fill the capacity. ____________
ID: 928118 ·

1mp0£173 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0	Message 928126 - Posted: 23 Aug 2009, 2:59:34 UTC - in response to Message 928118.
That's precisely what these are. Simple electical-to-optical conversion boxes. As long as the fibre in place supports the data rate (and most likely it does) it's unlikely Berkeley IT would have a legitimate objection, especially if they were given a chance to vet the installation beforehand. ... and the fundamental misunderstanding: IST won't "vet" the installation beforehand -- they'll be the ones specifying the gear and doing the installation. This is a service that IST provides to SETI@Home, and if this plays out, it could make IST's life easier. IST seems very user-friendly, but this is their plant, their facilities. ____________
ID: 928126 ·

1mp0£173 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0	Message 928270 - Posted: 23 Aug 2009, 20:29:26 UTC - in response to Message 928126. Last modified: 23 Aug 2009, 20:40:31 UTC
... and the fundamental misunderstanding: IST won't "vet" the installation beforehand -- they'll be the ones specifying the gear and doing the installation. This is a service that IST provides to SETI@Home, and if this plays out, it could make IST's life easier. IST seems very user-friendly, but this is their plant, their facilities. This may sound more negative than my intent. What I'm trying to point out is IST doesn't let just anyone do anything they wish, or their network would be a huge, tangled, unsupportable mess of, well, everything. The upside of this is that IST might have a bunch of links that would benefit from something like this, and if they called up D-Link with a potential sale of 50 units, they could probably get a couple of them as "evaluation" units, since IST would likely buy a small pile of them and upgrade other links instead of spending a ton of money trenching for fiber. (Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.) So, we generate buzz here. Someone at SETI@Home adds that "buzz" to the ticket with IST, and from there, we hope it works out. ____________
ID: 928270 ·

Josef W. Segur Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 3969 Credit: 938,010 RAC: 174	Message 928328 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 1:51:09 UTC
Unless there's an existing single mode fibre, the idea doesn't work anyhow. The multimode DMC-700SC is only good to 550 meters maximum with the best multimode fibre. I'm sure IST knows what they have in place, and if it were merely a matter of converting copper to fibre at 1GBits it would have been done by now. OTOH, the project probably won't need 1GBits for some years. An option to add another 100 MBits/second link down the hill should be interesting. Joe
ID: 928328 ·

ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7212 Credit: 3,703,622 RAC: 662	Message 928365 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 9:14:04 UTC - in response to Message 928328.
Unless there's an existing single mode fibre, the idea doesn't work anyhow. The multimode DMC-700SC is only good to 550 meters maximum with the best multimode fibre. I'm sure IST knows what they have in place, and if it were merely a matter of converting copper to fibre at 1GBits it would have been done by now. OTOH, the project probably won't need 1GBits for some years. An option to add another 100 MBits/second link down the hill should be interesting. Or a few more increments of 100Mbit/s with 100Mbit/s media converters if the existing fibre cable is actually a fibre bundle... (Was there ever any comment on whether the fibre is multimode or singlemode?) Happy crunchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 928365 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7670 Credit: 40,286,796 RAC: 21,264	Message 928369 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 10:13:11 UTC - in response to Message 928365.
(Was there ever any comment on whether the fibre is multimode or singlemode?) I asked that question, specifically of Matt, in the parallel Technical News thread where Martin also posted the D-Link information. But all of this discussion has taken place over Matt's weekend, so we wouldn't have expected a reply yet. More interestingly, I did a quick google for media converters (they're an absolutely standard bit of kit, if not yet common for domestic installations, and every serious networking manufacturer will have a comprehensive range). One of the first I looked at offered a model - specifically, a GBIC (the interchangable module which actually connects to the optical fibre) - capable of driving multi-mode fibre at 1 Gbit/sec over 2km. That brings us into the realm of the possible, if the other characteristics of the fibre, particularly wavelength, are right - the D-Links are too short-range over multimode, as Joe says. before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too Faster routers would be needed to get up to the full 1 Gbit/sec, but we don't need that yet. Remember what happened last time? We had a 100 Mbit/sec link, but it was maxxing out at about 60. After much scratching of heads, somebody eventually read the spec sheet of the routers then in use, and found that the CISCO engine which handles the tunneling was slower than all the other port and routing specifications. They installed new, higher-rated routers and that got us to the 95 Mbit/sec we can use today - this time, we presume, limited by the fibre and line drivers. IIRC, the new routers were specced with a reasonable amount of spare capacity (very good judgement by whoever it was that donated them - he's credited somewhere) - a fibre/driver upgrade should use some of the spare capacity, and then a router upgrade would give the next boost. tick, tock.
ID: 928369 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7670 Credit: 40,286,796 RAC: 21,264	Message 928380 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 10:59:14 UTC - in response to Message 928270.
(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.) Not in the lab, they're not. Found the reference in Happy MLK Day (Jan 22 2008): "Bill Woodcock ... has donated another cisco router to us to replace [the] weaker 2811. It a 7600 series, a bit overkill, but will give us tons of headroom to spare." Looking at the CISCO 7600 spec sheets, the weakest link (like last time) should be the VPN tunneling adapter, which I guess will be a Cisco IPSec VPN SPA - rated at 2.5 Gbps per module. That should keep us going! NB: Matt didn't say what had been installed by IST at the bottom of the hill to handle their end of the tunnel. That one may not have been upgraded as far.
ID: 928380 ·

ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7212 Credit: 3,703,622 RAC: 662	Message 928415 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 15:22:17 UTC - in response to Message 928380.
(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.) Not in the lab, they're not. Found the reference in Happy MLK Day (Jan 22 2008): "Bill Woodcock ... has donated another cisco router to us to replace [the] weaker 2811. It a 7600 series, a bit overkill, but will give us tons of headroom to spare." Looking at the CISCO 7600 spec sheets, the weakest link (like last time) should be the VPN tunneling adapter, which I guess will be a Cisco IPSec VPN SPA - rated at 2.5 Gbps per module. That should keep us going! NB: Matt didn't say what had been installed by IST at the bottom of the hill to handle their end of the tunnel. That one may not have been upgraded as far. Good sleuthing there! Looking good!! Happy crunchin', Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 928415 ·

1mp0£173 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0	Message 928428 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 16:54:39 UTC - in response to Message 928380.
(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.) Not in the lab, they're not. Found the reference in Happy MLK Day (Jan 22 2008): "Bill Woodcock ... has donated another cisco router to us to replace [the] weaker 2811. It a 7600 series, a bit overkill, but will give us tons of headroom to spare." Looking at the CISCO 7600 spec sheets, the weakest link (like last time) should be the VPN tunneling adapter, which I guess will be a Cisco IPSec VPN SPA - rated at 2.5 Gbps per module. That should keep us going! NB: Matt didn't say what had been installed by IST at the bottom of the hill to handle their end of the tunnel. That one may not have been upgraded as far. The link from Hurricane Electric to SSL is a SERVICE provided by IST. What we're talking about are products. Let me give you an example. I have a T1. It has a proper RJ48, it looks like a normal B8ZS/ESF wire, with great characteristics. A "real" T1 would be a four wire connection from here to the CO, with about three amplifiers. I connect to it with a CSU/DSU and V.35 serial just like any other T1. What Verizon actually installed is a jack with some electronics, and a single pair to a matching set of electronics at the Central Office. The wire is actually running HDSL2 at slightly faster than T1 speed. It runs error correction so that most errors get corrected and it's probably slightly better than a "real" T1. It takes less equipment so there is less equipment to fail. In other words, "what I get" is T1 -- how is "HDSL2." IST will respond to the open ticket with either "yes" or "no" and a formal cost for the upgrade. What SETI gets is "gigabit" -- how is up to the service provider. ... and when it happens, operating that link and keeping it operational will be up to IST -- it will be their responsibility. ____________
ID: 928428 ·

Blurf Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 2 Sep 06 Posts: 6467 Credit: 5,735,895 RAC: 2,611	Message 928450 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 19:14:52 UTC
Matt has been notified of this thread and will post when he is able I believe :) ____________
ID: 928450 ·

Matt Lebofsky Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1379 Credit: 74,079 RAC: 0	Message 928453 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 19:41:52 UTC
Honestly, I'm purposefully staying out of this loop as I'm already in way too many loops. But my general understanding of the current situation is: 1. Campus only uses hardware it tests/trusts and are willing to use in bulk (so they don't have to deal with a zillion variants). 2. This bottleneck was a major problem a month or two ago, but due to increasing the resolution of the science (and thus slowing down multibeam workunits) our bandwidth needs were vastly reduced. 3. Nevertheless we are still waiting to hear from campus before we can really do anything. At least that's where I think we are. As always, thanks for your concern/interest/ideas. - Matt ____________ -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude
ID: 928453 ·

ML1 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 7212 Credit: 3,703,622 RAC: 662	Message 928482 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 22:06:32 UTC - in response to Message 928453.
Hey... Thanks for taking a look-see. Can't help but get excited over a possible $4000 transparent fix as opposed to a $100000 bureaucratic saga ;-) Good luck for the Campus Networking people looking favourably upon the project. Regards, Martin ____________ Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS! See new freedom Mageia2 The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 928482 ·

Matt Lebofsky Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project scientist Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1379 Credit: 74,079 RAC: 0	Message 928487 - Posted: 24 Aug 2009, 22:31:43 UTC
By the way, given the state budget crisis I'm sure central campus computing is vastly affected by this, and I wouldn't be surprised if all such improvement projects are put on hold. We shall see... - Matt ____________ -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude
ID: 928487 ·

Author

Message

ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 7212
Credit: 3,703,622
RAC: 662

Could this little device be the solution to the s@h campus fibre woes?

No new fibre required, likely no new routers or any other equipment required. Easy.

Too good to be true?

See:

D-Link 1000BaseT to 1000BaseSX Multimode Media Converter $351 1000BASE-T Gigabit Twisted-pair to 1000BASE-SX Gigabit Fiber Multi-mode Fiber (550m, SC) Media Converter Module • UTP to Multimode Fibre Media Converter • SC Fibre connector • Includes Power Supply for standalone use

DMC-700SC

D-Link 1000BaseT to 1000BaseLX Singlemode Media Converter $1,117 1000BASE-T Gigabit Twisted-pair to 1000BASE-LX Gigabit Fiber Single-mode Fiber (10km, SC) Media Converter Module. • UTP to Singlemode Fibre Media Converter • SC Fibre connector • Distance up to 10km • Includes Power Supply for standalone use

DMC-810SC

One of them at each end gets you 1Gbit/s over 2km of multimode fibre.

That looks to be a drop-in replacement and an awful lot less than $100k!

(s@h has a 1Gbit/s internet link. However, the campus fibre connection to that link only runs at 100Mbit/s at present...)

Happy crunchin',
Martin

Also posted on the Technical forum
____________
Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS!
See new freedom Mageia2
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

ID: 927695 ·

DJStarfox
Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1040
Credit: 486,408
RAC: 78

You should PM Matt and see if he responds.

ID: 927707 ·

Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3232
Credit: 31,585,541
RAC: 0

Hi, sounds almost too good to be true, but it's a hell of a lot cheaper, then the 'old' solution.

____________

Knight Who Says Ni N!, OUT numbered.................

ID: 927798 ·

Ianab
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 11 Jun 08
Posts: 568
Credit: 9,406,456
RAC: 13,731

Problem is it's not so simple.

The infrastructure is run by the University IT department and they have their own standards for routers. They will have management systems for monitoring and programing the dozens of routers around the campus. They will not just plug in any random boxes and hope they work.

In a small organisation, where you are THE I.T. manager or consultant, you can just go and buy the boxes you need and set them up. In a larger organisation, life is not so easy.

The Dilbert comic strips pretty much explain how it all works.

Ian

ID: 927829 ·

1mp0£173
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0

The Dilbert comic strips pretty much explain how it all works.

Dilbert explains pretty much how everything works.

____________

ID: 927855 ·

VBobier

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 41284
Credit: 32,369,259
RAC: 5,467

The Dilbert comic strips pretty much explain how it all works.

Dilbert explains pretty much how everything works.

Or as It doesn't work as the case may be. :D
____________
BSG Anthem
My Facebook page

ID: 927858 ·

ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 7212
Credit: 3,703,622
RAC: 662

Problem is it's not so simple.

The infrastructure is run by the University IT department...

Indeed so.

And hence part of the excitement of this solution is that those little boxes may well just be a "transparent" inline solution for the existing equipment. That is very likely so at the SSL end with their Gbit routers. Also, there have been previous hints that there is a Gbit route possible for the Hurricane end...

The real excitement is the claim made for the multimode fibre adapter!...

Whatever... It's a possible neat low cost solution if it fits into the overall picture.

Happy crunchin',
Martin

____________
Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS!
See new freedom Mageia2
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

ID: 928050 ·

Matthew S. McCleary
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Sep 99
Posts: 121
Credit: 2,288,242
RAC: 0

And hence part of the excitement of this solution is that those little boxes may well just be a "transparent" inline solution for the existing equipment.

That's precisely what these are. Simple electical-to-optical conversion boxes. As long as the fibre in place supports the data rate (and most likely it does) it's unlikely Berkeley IT would have a legitimate objection, especially if they were given a chance to vet the installation beforehand.

Go for it, I say. Of course, we'll run into the same old problem -- you throw more disk space or bandwidth at the users, and pretty soon the need grows to fill the capacity.
____________

ID: 928118 ·

1mp0£173
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0

That's precisely what these are. Simple electical-to-optical conversion boxes. As long as the fibre in place supports the data rate (and most likely it does) it's unlikely Berkeley IT would have a legitimate objection, especially if they were given a chance to vet the installation beforehand.

... and the fundamental misunderstanding: IST won't "vet" the installation beforehand -- they'll be the ones specifying the gear and doing the installation.

This is a service that IST provides to SETI@Home, and if this plays out, it could make IST's life easier.

IST seems very user-friendly, but this is their plant, their facilities.

____________

ID: 928126 ·

1mp0£173
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0

... and the fundamental misunderstanding: IST won't "vet" the installation beforehand -- they'll be the ones specifying the gear and doing the installation.

This is a service that IST provides to SETI@Home, and if this plays out, it could make IST's life easier.

IST seems very user-friendly, but this is their plant, their facilities.

This may sound more negative than my intent.

What I'm trying to point out is IST doesn't let just anyone do anything they wish, or their network would be a huge, tangled, unsupportable mess of, well, everything.

The upside of this is that IST might have a bunch of links that would benefit from something like this, and if they called up D-Link with a potential sale of 50 units, they could probably get a couple of them as "evaluation" units, since IST would likely buy a small pile of them and upgrade other links instead of spending a ton of money trenching for fiber.

(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.)

So, we generate buzz here. Someone at SETI@Home adds that "buzz" to the ticket with IST, and from there, we hope it works out.
____________

ID: 928270 ·

Josef W. Segur

Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 3969
Credit: 938,010
RAC: 174

Unless there's an existing single mode fibre, the idea doesn't work anyhow. The multimode DMC-700SC is only good to 550 meters maximum with the best multimode fibre. I'm sure IST knows what they have in place, and if it were merely a matter of converting copper to fibre at 1GBits it would have been done by now.

OTOH, the project probably won't need 1GBits for some years. An option to add another 100 MBits/second link down the hill should be interesting.

Joe

ID: 928328 ·

ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 7212
Credit: 3,703,622
RAC: 662

Unless there's an existing single mode fibre, the idea doesn't work anyhow. The multimode DMC-700SC is only good to 550 meters maximum with the best multimode fibre. I'm sure IST knows what they have in place, and if it were merely a matter of converting copper to fibre at 1GBits it would have been done by now.

OTOH, the project probably won't need 1GBits for some years. An option to add another 100 MBits/second link down the hill should be interesting.

Or a few more increments of 100Mbit/s with 100Mbit/s media converters if the existing fibre cable is actually a fibre bundle...

(Was there ever any comment on whether the fibre is multimode or singlemode?)

Happy crunchin',
Martin

____________
Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS!
See new freedom Mageia2
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

ID: 928365 ·

Richard Haselgrove

Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 7670
Credit: 40,286,796
RAC: 21,264

(Was there ever any comment on whether the fibre is multimode or singlemode?)

I asked that question, specifically of Matt, in the parallel Technical News thread where Martin also posted the D-Link information. But all of this discussion has taken place over Matt's weekend, so we wouldn't have expected a reply yet.

More interestingly, I did a quick google for media converters (they're an absolutely standard bit of kit, if not yet common for domestic installations, and every serious networking manufacturer will have a comprehensive range). One of the first I looked at offered a model - specifically, a GBIC (the interchangable module which actually connects to the optical fibre) - capable of driving multi-mode fibre at 1 Gbit/sec over 2km. That brings us into the realm of the possible, if the other characteristics of the fibre, particularly wavelength, are right - the D-Links are too short-range over multimode, as Joe says.

before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too

Faster routers would be needed to get up to the full 1 Gbit/sec, but we don't need that yet. Remember what happened last time? We had a 100 Mbit/sec link, but it was maxxing out at about 60. After much scratching of heads, somebody eventually read the spec sheet of the routers then in use, and found that the CISCO engine which handles the tunneling was slower than all the other port and routing specifications. They installed new, higher-rated routers and that got us to the 95 Mbit/sec we can use today - this time, we presume, limited by the fibre and line drivers. IIRC, the new routers were specced with a reasonable amount of spare capacity (very good judgement by whoever it was that donated them - he's credited somewhere) - a fibre/driver upgrade should use some of the spare capacity, and then a router upgrade would give the next boost. tick, tock.

ID: 928369 ·

Richard Haselgrove

Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 7670
Credit: 40,286,796
RAC: 21,264

(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.)

Not in the lab, they're not. Found the reference in Happy MLK Day (Jan 22 2008): "Bill Woodcock ... has donated another cisco router to us to replace [the] weaker 2811. It a 7600 series, a bit overkill, but will give us tons of headroom to spare."

Looking at the CISCO 7600 spec sheets, the weakest link (like last time) should be the VPN tunneling adapter, which I guess will be a Cisco IPSec VPN SPA - rated at 2.5 Gbps per module. That should keep us going!

NB: Matt didn't say what had been installed by IST at the bottom of the hill to handle their end of the tunnel. That one may not have been upgraded as far.

ID: 928380 ·

ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 7212
Credit: 3,703,622
RAC: 662

(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.)

Not in the lab, they're not. Found the reference in Happy MLK Day (Jan 22 2008): "Bill Woodcock ... has donated another cisco router to us to replace [the] weaker 2811. It a 7600 series, a bit overkill, but will give us tons of headroom to spare."

Looking at the CISCO 7600 spec sheets, the weakest link (like last time) should be the VPN tunneling adapter, which I guess will be a Cisco IPSec VPN SPA - rated at 2.5 Gbps per module. That should keep us going!

NB: Matt didn't say what had been installed by IST at the bottom of the hill to handle their end of the tunnel. That one may not have been upgraded as far.

Good sleuthing there!

Looking good!!

Happy crunchin',
Martin

____________
Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS!
See new freedom Mageia2
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

ID: 928415 ·

1mp0£173
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0

(Edit: before you get too excited, getting the fiber to work is just part of the problem -- Matt says faster routers are needed too.)

Not in the lab, they're not. Found the reference in Happy MLK Day (Jan 22 2008): "Bill Woodcock ... has donated another cisco router to us to replace [the] weaker 2811. It a 7600 series, a bit overkill, but will give us tons of headroom to spare."

Looking at the CISCO 7600 spec sheets, the weakest link (like last time) should be the VPN tunneling adapter, which I guess will be a Cisco IPSec VPN SPA - rated at 2.5 Gbps per module. That should keep us going!

NB: Matt didn't say what had been installed by IST at the bottom of the hill to handle their end of the tunnel. That one may not have been upgraded as far.

The link from Hurricane Electric to SSL is a SERVICE provided by IST.

What we're talking about are products.

Let me give you an example.

I have a T1. It has a proper RJ48, it looks like a normal B8ZS/ESF wire, with great characteristics. A "real" T1 would be a four wire connection from here to the CO, with about three amplifiers. I connect to it with a CSU/DSU and V.35 serial just like any other T1.

What Verizon actually installed is a jack with some electronics, and a single pair to a matching set of electronics at the Central Office. The wire is actually running HDSL2 at slightly faster than T1 speed. It runs error correction so that most errors get corrected and it's probably slightly better than a "real" T1. It takes less equipment so there is less equipment to fail.

In other words, "what I get" is T1 -- how is "HDSL2."

IST will respond to the open ticket with either "yes" or "no" and a formal cost for the upgrade. What SETI gets is "gigabit" -- how is up to the service provider.

... and when it happens, operating that link and keeping it operational will be up to IST -- it will be their responsibility.
____________

ID: 928428 ·

Blurf
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 6467
Credit: 5,735,895
RAC: 2,611

Matt has been notified of this thread and will post when he is able I believe :)
____________

ID: 928450 ·

Matt Lebofsky
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 1379
Credit: 74,079
RAC: 0

Honestly, I'm purposefully staying out of this loop as I'm already in way too many loops. But my general understanding of the current situation is:

1. Campus only uses hardware it tests/trusts *and* are willing to use in bulk (so they don't have to deal with a zillion variants).

2. This bottleneck was a major problem a month or two ago, but due to increasing the resolution of the science (and thus slowing down multibeam workunits) our bandwidth needs were vastly reduced.

3. Nevertheless we are still waiting to hear from campus before we can really do anything. At least that's where I think we are.

As always, thanks for your concern/interest/ideas.

- Matt
____________
-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person
-- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude

ID: 928453 ·

ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 7212
Credit: 3,703,622
RAC: 662

Hey... Thanks for taking a look-see.

Can't help but get excited over a possible $4000 transparent fix as opposed to a $100000 bureaucratic saga ;-)

Good luck for the Campus Networking people looking favourably upon the project.

Regards,
Martin

____________
Mandriva Linux A user friendly OS!
See new freedom Mageia2
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

ID: 928482 ·

Matt Lebofsky
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 1379
Credit: 74,079
RAC: 0

By the way, given the state budget crisis I'm sure central campus computing is vastly affected by this, and I wouldn't be surprised if *all* such improvement projects are put on hold. We shall see...

- Matt
____________
-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person
-- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude

ID: 928487 ·