If fire insurance were like health insurance. |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : SETI@home Staff Blog : If fire insurance were like health insurance.
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
I only had red fire extinguishers. Yellow is apparently required. LOL! don't forget the green ones too... | |
| ID: 921579 · | |
|
I get really tired of all the excuses doctors have for their standard of living, in Canada, and elsewhere. There are lots of us, like Eric and myself, who spent a lot of time and money in school to advance our careers, and have benefited society as a result. (Well, probably more Eric than me.) | |
| ID: 921690 · | |
I only had red fire extinguishers. Yellow is apparently required. Yup! Always stick with the yellow one's! ____________ | |
| ID: 921694 · | |
|
The issue of compensation rates for doctors is a blind alley. It sidetracks discussion and diverts attention from just who is really profiting from healthcare in the hands of private insurers. | |
| ID: 921726 · | |
We are a society of people, who live on the earth together. None of us are perfect, but too often, we stop thinking beyond ourselves too much. I agree that how we treat others around us is a reflection of our society. I disagree that we should hand over the duty of taking care of "the weakest" to government. In the end, it's the responsibility of us all to take care of others. And I'm tired of blaming "the evil corporate entities" as the problem. They are part of the problem. But it's also a problem of believing that folks that take responsibility for themselves, build a business or trade, and then are taxed at a high rate BECAUSE THEY ARE SUCCESSFUL should pay for anyone who "can't afford healthcare". I'm willing to pay my share, but that share shouldn't be any more than anyone else, including the "middle class". So put a 1% (or whatever percentage fits here) tax on everyone's income (including Congress!) to pay for a better way in healthcare. Note: I'm not in the healthcare industry, but have been dealing with it for over 40 years. I don't make over $200,000 or whatever number is considered "rich" these days. I'm tired of the politicians trying to spend the $ I send to the government... ____________ Mark | |
| ID: 921932 · | |
|
Progressive taxation is an entirely different issue than health care. | |
| ID: 922027 · | |
|
Careful Eric, I hear that it is hard for socialists to get government funding where you live. | |
| ID: 922031 · | |
The government is all of us. It is our collective will that allows government to exist. It's also true, in spite of what libertarian thought and corporatists tell us, one of the things government can do very well is take care of those in need. The notion mentioned in the quote above sounds quite reasonable if one doesn't take a moment to think it through. Only government has the resources and infrastructure to deliver aid evenly throughout the country. If an entire city becomes economically stressed, say Detroit or Flint Michigan, due to the greed of an industry moving manufacturing overseas, everyone is affected. Therefore, less disposable income means less aid to others within the area. People aren't likely to send donations across the continent to help out when there are local needs to be taken care of where they live. Only through government can we ensure help for all who need it. | |
| ID: 922072 · | |
I disagree that we should hand over the duty of taking care of "the weakest" to government. In the end, it's the responsibility of us all to take care of others. Well said! Perhaps a government in a libertarian society could just send people the names of the "weakest" that they are directly responsible for. Along with their medical bills. ____________ | |
| ID: 922097 · | |
It's also true, in spite of what libertarian thought and corporatists tell us, one of the things government can do very well is take care of those in need. Try telling that to the Hurricane Katrina victims. ____________ | |
| ID: 922124 · | |
It's also true, in spite of what libertarian thought and corporatists tell us, one of the things government can do very well is take care of those in need. Emphasis added in first quote. Governments are run by people and thus prone to failures and mistakes. Unless somebody has a better solution, this just means you need to constantly monitor and correct your government. The big advantage a true democracy has over other forms of government is the ability to do this. ____________ | |
| ID: 922133 · | |
It's also true, in spite of what libertarian thought and corporatists tell us, one of the things government can do very well is take care of those in need. Of course they can do it very well, but mistakes like Katrina shouldn't have happened and are inexcusable. If they can't even do that, then what makes you think anyone should trust them further? I could bring up several other examples of bad government to prove that they aren't just mistakes or human error, and that Katrina isn't just an isolated incident, but I hope I don't need to go there to prove my point. ____________ | |
| ID: 922136 · | |
|
So what alternatives to governments handling natural disasters (etc.) do you propose? What are their track records? | |
| ID: 922142 · | |
It's also true, in spite of what libertarian thought and corporatists tell us, one of the things government can do very well is take care of those in need. Well part of the problem there was the Bush administration disassembling the existing government operated disaster response system and replacing it with private contractors that weren't really qualified or capable of doing the same job. For example the job of dispatching relief supplies went from the National Emergency Operations Center to one person who wasn't available 24/7. That policy was due to political leaders taking the concept that "the private sector can always do things better than government" as an article of faith. From a 2004 (pre-Katrina) article entitled "A Disaster Waiting to Happen": In June, Pleasant Mann, a 16-year FEMA veteran who heads the agency's government employee union, wrote members of Congress to warn of the agency's decay. "Over the past three-and-one-half years, FEMA has gone from being a model agency to being one where funds are being misspent, employee morale has fallen, and our nation's emergency management capability is being eroded," he wrote. "Our professional staff are being systematically replaced by politically connected novices and contractors." President Reagan was famous for saying that the most frightening phrase in the English language is "I'm from the government and I here to help." A more frightening phrase is "I'm from the insurance company and I'm here to find a reason to deny you the coverage you paid for." ____________ | |
| ID: 922160 · | |
|
Healthcare is a right, not a damned privilege. Let me add the republican perspective. Since I believe the U.S. has not totally converted to socialism. You are right,healthcare is not a privilege,it is a LUXURY! In a capitalist society it is not up to ME to pay for anyones healthcare but myself and my family's,And I have a hard enough time doing that.It might sound cold,but I believe grown-ups should pretty much take care of themselves. I also believe anything government can do,private industry can do better,cheaper,faster. | |
| ID: 922162 · | |
|
When advocates of privatization are elected to public office, they bring their ideologies with them. | |
| ID: 922245 · | |
|
That's your opion and you have the right to it. I have seen 1'st hand the private sector doing it better,road construction comes to mind off the top of my head. Low bidder is accepted and everyone prospers because of COMPETITION.Not a lot of competition in government. Try waiting in line in this country to get your drivers license renewed or even mail something, the indifference and apathy are quite infuriating.I also notice the maple leaf on your flag. Not to sterotype, but just the opion I would have expected. | |
| ID: 922276 · | |
|
at least Canadians vote more often than Americans! And you must remember that Canada has 4 Providences and their system is built different.... | |
| ID: 922290 · | |
You can believe it, but that doesn't make it true. With health care, private industry has shown pretty conclusively that it cannot do it better, cheaper or faster. We spend more money on health care than most other first world countries and have worse outcomes. Private insurers will spend $30 to keep from having to pay for $10 worth of care. The reason that conservatives don't want a public option for health care is that they know it will be more affordable than private insurance, and people will use it. It was the shift from a primarily non-profit to a for-profit health care system that got us into this mess in the first place. (Even many of the current health care "non-profits" are just hiding profits.) That's your opion and you have the right to it. I have seen 1'st hand the private sector doing it better,road construction comes to mind off the top of my head. Low bidder is accepted and everyone prospers because of COMPETITION. And five years later, when the road needs to be redone because the low bidder didn't follow the specification for the road bed, a new low bidder will be found. When the SSL addition was built, the low bidder cut a few corners, like under-sizing the wire gauge while keeping the high current fuses. Can you say fire danger? The desire to be the low bidder often results in contractors deliberately using substandard materials or doing a half-assed job. And some conservatives have pushed through laws that have made it harder to choose anybody but the low bidder, even if they are on trial for the corners they cut on their last job. And I wonder where the money for road construction comes from?
When I try to mail something, I print an online address label and hand it to a postal carrier without waiting in line. When I renew my driver's license it is done by mail. I think it is nothing short of incredible that I can send a physical object a distance of 2600 miles in three days at a cost of 44 cents. FedEx will do the same thing for only $13.33. Is that better, cheaper and faster? I can't even send a fax at FedEx for 44 cents. Would you rather the Post Office be privatized so it can charge whatever the market will bear? Get ready for the $10 stamp. If you want indifference and apathy, try to get help finding an item at Macy's. If you want to wait in a line, try to buy something there. But they are the only department store that is left on this side of the country, so they don't need to provide service. That's one reason why I shop online. I'm not saying that government does everything better. I'm just saying that profit motive can be an impediment to efficiency and lower costs. Unless you consider making sure that sick people can't get care to be an efficiency booster.
I note that he doesn't seem too unhappy with his health care system. ____________ | |
| ID: 922308 · | |
|
I think we can agree to disagree. | |
| ID: 922456 · | |
Message boards : SETI@home Staff Blog : If fire insurance were like health insurance.
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |