x4 or x16 slot critical with cuda?

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : x4 or x16 slot critical with cuda?

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Chuck Gorish

Send message
Joined: 19 Jun 00
Posts: 156
Credit: 29,589,106
RAC: 0
United States
Message 920481 - Posted: 22 Jul 2009, 22:56:00 UTC

all things being equal and speaking only about cuda processing and nothing else, with a gtx285 will there be a noticable difference in wu production whether it is in a x16 or a x4 slot?


ID: 920481 · Report as offensive
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15103
Credit: 45,164,743
RAC: 40,462
United States
Message 920545 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 2:54:33 UTC - in response to Message 920481.

No, it is not critical. In fact, tests in Number Crunching have shown the PCIe speed to make very little difference.


ID: 920545 · Report as offensive
Chuck Gorish

Send message
Joined: 19 Jun 00
Posts: 156
Credit: 29,589,106
RAC: 0
United States
Message 920608 - Posted: 23 Jul 2009, 8:10:24 UTC - in response to Message 920545.

thank you! makes life much simpler now.


ID: 920608 · Report as offensive
Profile TCP JESUS
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Jan 03
Posts: 205
Credit: 1,248,845
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 920895 - Posted: 24 Jul 2009, 1:42:51 UTC
Last modified: 24 Jul 2009, 1:44:40 UTC

I 'modified' a few x1 slots and ran some tests.

I compared two IDENTICAL cards, 1 running in an x16 slot and the second card running in an x1 slot (at the same time) and there was essentially NO difference when comparing WU results and running time.

The cards were Geforce 9600 GSO 768 MB DDR2 cards.

I am reluctant to say if the same will ring true with GTX 200 series cards, but I can't see why not.




The thread I started....
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=54467


I am TCP JESUS...The Carpenter Phenom Jesus....and HAMMERING is what I do best!
formerly known as...MC Hammer.

ID: 920895 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : x4 or x16 slot critical with cuda?


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.