Message boards :
Number crunching :
Who's computer requests 0 (zero) credit???
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
. Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 410 Credit: 16,559 RAC: 0 |
I looked on my Results and found something very strange. A WU my and others computer requested credit for, recieved 0 (zero) because one computer requested 0 (zero). So who has a computer that don't request credit??? http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1065705 |
Rachel Send message Joined: 13 Apr 02 Posts: 978 Credit: 449,704 RAC: 0 |
> I looked on my Results and found something very strange. A WU my and others > computer requested credit for, recieved 0 (zero) because one computer > requested 0 (zero). So who has a computer that don't request credit??? > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1065705 > I noticed several of my wu's had that too.I do not get it either. ......In Space No One Can Hear You Scream...... |
STE\/E Send message Joined: 29 Mar 03 Posts: 1137 Credit: 5,334,063 RAC: 0 |
Those are my Computers, I detest Credits so I Request 0 ... ;) |
gomeyer Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 488 Credit: 50,370,425 RAC: 0 |
Just a guess, but might these be WU's that were uploaded but not reported? |
Siran d'Vel'nahr Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 7379 Credit: 44,181,323 RAC: 238 |
> Those are my Computers, I detest Credits so I Request 0 ... ;) > HaHaHaHaHaHa....!!!! L8R.... --- CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\// Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker "Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath |
. Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 410 Credit: 16,559 RAC: 0 |
> Those are my Computers, I detest Credits so I Request 0 ... ;) > What a brave man you are!!! ;-) Do you really dare to admit this in this forum??? |
EclipseHA Send message Joined: 28 Jul 99 Posts: 1018 Credit: 530,719 RAC: 0 |
If one user for the WU had the "famous" uload error that been happening the last week, you get zero credits! Check the result page and you'll see "Check stopped" and the user that had the upload error has an outcome of "Couldn't validate - missing file" Not only does the use who had the error not get credit for not uloading, but the other users lost credit too! I've seen this in a dozen WU with zero credit (not "pending" credit) for my machines...... |
. Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 410 Credit: 16,559 RAC: 0 |
> If one user for the WU had the "famous" uload error that been happening the > last week, you get zero credits! > > Check the result page and you'll see "Check stopped" and the user that had the > upload error has an outcome of "Couldn't validate - missing file" > > Not only does the use who had the error not get credit for not uloading, but > the other users lost credit too! > > I've seen this in a dozen WU with zero credit (not "pending" credit) for my > machines...... > No, this is NOT the case!!! Check out my link! There are NO upload errors!!! http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1065705 |
mikey Send message Joined: 17 Dec 99 Posts: 4215 Credit: 3,474,603 RAC: 0 |
> > If one user for the WU had the "famous" uload error that been happening > the > > last week, you get zero credits! > > > > Check the result page and you'll see "Check stopped" and the user that > had the > > upload error has an outcome of "Couldn't validate - missing file" > > > > Not only does the use who had the error not get credit for not uloading, > but > > the other users lost credit too! > > > > I've seen this in a dozen WU with zero credit (not "pending" credit) for > my > > machines...... > > > > No, this is NOT the case!!! Check out my link! There are NO upload errors!!! > If you click on the column on the left of the workunit number it gives another page of stats and it looks like all the units that have 0.00 issued credits have an entry that says "Validate state Check skipped" in it. No idea what it means but that is why no credit was issued. |
. Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 410 Credit: 16,559 RAC: 0 |
> If you click on the column on the left of the workunit number it gives another > page of stats and it looks like all the units that have 0.00 issued credits > have an entry that says "Validate state Check skipped" in it. > No idea what it means but that is why no credit was issued. > > Yes, you may have a point there. My next question will then be: What does "Check skipped" means??? Again, it looks strange that all computers upload fine and one computer claims no credit. What went wrong??? |
EclipseHA Send message Joined: 28 Jul 99 Posts: 1018 Credit: 530,719 RAC: 0 |
> > If you click on the column on the left of the workunit number it gives > another > > page of stats and it looks like all the units that have 0.00 issued > credits > > have an entry that says "Validate state Check skipped" in it. > > No idea what it means but that is why no credit was issued. > > > > > Yes, you may have a point there. My next question will then be: What does > "Check skipped" means??? Again, it looks strange that all computers upload > fine and one computer claims no credit. What went wrong??? > It means, due the a single upload error, all crunchers for the WU get 0.0 credit. You did nothing wrong, but lost all credit due to another user's upload error (well, really, a seti/boinc upload error). I'm sure I've lost 100's of credits due to this... ;{ |
. Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 410 Credit: 16,559 RAC: 0 |
> > It means, due the a single upload error, all crunchers for the WU get 0.0 > credit. You did nothing wrong, but lost all credit due to another user's > upload error (well, really, a seti/boinc upload error). I have checked one of the ones where my upload failed (or something else went wrong), and there the others got credit and I didn't (of course). It still looks strange to me that my computer in my link (which is 127769 by the way) and 3 others went fine and still none of us gets credit. If you are right, the others where the error were from me, none should get credit either. See this link http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1659525 >I'm sure I've lost 100's of credits due to this... ;{ It's not that I'm mad because of my missing credits, because I don't care. I simply don't understand the above. I don't get it!!!??? |
EclipseHA Send message Joined: 28 Jul 99 Posts: 1018 Credit: 530,719 RAC: 0 |
> > > > It means, due the a single upload error, all crunchers for the WU get > 0.0 > > credit. You did nothing wrong, but lost all credit due to another > user's > > upload error (well, really, a seti/boinc upload error). > > I have checked one of the ones where my upload failed (or something else went > wrong), and there the others got credit and I didn't (of course). It still > looks strange to me that my computer in my link (which is 127769 by the way) > and 3 others went fine and still none of us gets credit. If you are right, the > others where the error were from me, none should get credit either. See this > link > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=1659525 > > >I'm sure I've lost 100's of credits due to this... ;{ > > It's not that I'm mad because of my missing credits, because I don't care. I > simply don't understand the above. I don't get it!!!??? > It's simple - the process is wackey and has been for some time... For a few days after the June 22 launch, results were visable, and the same thing came up.. Other projects that have allowed viewing results/pending have had long discussions about how credits work, vs how they were planned to work... |
. Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 410 Credit: 16,559 RAC: 0 |
> > Other projects that have allowed viewing results/pending have had long > discussions about how credits work, vs how they were planned to work... > > > Yeah, maybe they shouldn't have turned this function on!!!! I myself have often been tired of all the discussion on this forum about not getting credits and when are we gonna get some :-(, so now I'm pouring gasoline on the fire myself ;-) Now we can have these mysteries to ponder on... |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.