On Bandwidth (Jul 08 2009)

Message boards : Technical News : On Bandwidth (Jul 08 2009)

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

AuthorMessage
OzzFan
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15107
Credit: 45,243,211
RAC: 41,372
United States
Message 918003 - Posted: 15 Jul 2009, 13:19:28 UTC - in response to Message 917781.

By golly, I think he gets it!


ID: 918003 · Report as offensive
Nicolas
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Mar 05
Posts: 160
Credit: 10,335
RAC: 0
Argentina
Message 918310 - Posted: 16 Jul 2009, 1:07:14 UTC - in response to Message 916021.

If they were to shutdown for a month to work on things. Wouldn't they need to plan that in advance for the wu's that would expire while out in the field?

No, I don't think you're getting the idea.

They'd shutdown for a month and maybe leave us with no work to crunch for almost a month. They wouldn't necessarily give us a month worth of work first. But during that time they'd do useful work instead of constantly fighting fires, and the project as a whole will be better when it comes back.

Contribute to the Wiki!

ID: 918310 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Message boards : Technical News : On Bandwidth (Jul 08 2009)


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.