Reliable backup project

Message boards : Number crunching : Reliable backup project
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 911589 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 10:00:31 UTC

It seems my own favorite backup project, Einstein@home, can't be considered as reliable.
Second time already it has server crash simultaneous with SETI problems.
What backup projects do you use? (please, with one sentence aim description if possible).
ID: 911589 · Report as offensive
CryptokiD
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Dec 00
Posts: 150
Credit: 3,216,632
RAC: 0
United States
Message 911590 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 10:06:30 UTC - in response to Message 911589.  

power button
ID: 911590 · Report as offensive
Vid Vidmar*
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 136
Credit: 1,830,317
RAC: 0
Slovenia
Message 911598 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 10:27:07 UTC - in response to Message 911589.  

Primegrid, ABC and MilkyWay, however I run them at equal resource shares. PG and ABC because they have efficient 64bit apps, MW because it runs on my ATI card. PG and ABC are reliable.
BR,
ID: 911598 · Report as offensive
Chelski
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Jan 00
Posts: 121
Credit: 8,979,050
RAC: 0
Malaysia
Message 911602 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 10:46:55 UTC

My first backup is an additional 7 days cache of Seti.
Unfortunately the second backup is Einstein.
Cosmology sits at 3rd, but definitely not that reliable.

I suppose my backup projects tend to be ad-hoc, attached only when turbulence expected at S@H.
ID: 911602 · Report as offensive
Ianab
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Jun 08
Posts: 732
Credit: 20,635,586
RAC: 5
New Zealand
Message 911604 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 10:49:41 UTC - in response to Message 911589.  

Primegrid seems pretty relaible. You may get the fame of finding some huge Prime number.

Spinhenge - reliable and nice small work units make for a good backup.

Otherwise, take your pick. You can channel surf and pick what takes your fancy.

Ian
ID: 911604 · Report as offensive
Profile [B^S] madmac
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Feb 04
Posts: 1175
Credit: 4,754,897
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 911606 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 11:00:09 UTC

Either Prime Grid or WCG
ID: 911606 · Report as offensive
Profile Bill Walker
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 99
Posts: 3868
Credit: 2,697,267
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 911609 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 11:05:51 UTC

Climate Prediction. Tasks take hundreds of days, with points received for intermediate reports. Plus, the graphics are kind of cool.

ID: 911609 · Report as offensive
Ingleside
Volunteer developer

Send message
Joined: 4 Feb 03
Posts: 1546
Credit: 15,832,022
RAC: 13
Norway
Message 911624 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 12:24:10 UTC

Einstein, Rosetta and WCG on all, and for the fastest computer also includes CPDN.
"I make so many mistakes. But then just think of all the mistakes I don't make, although I might."
ID: 911624 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 911628 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 12:38:20 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jun 2009, 12:47:55 UTC

AQUA, QMC, CPDN and CPDN Beta, Einstein, LHC. This last is practically dead.AQUA simulates a quantum computer, QMC is about quantum chemistry via MonteCarlo method, CPDNs are climate models, Einstein searches gravitational waves but uses also Arecibo radio data to hunt double pulsars. LHC used to model particle trajectories in the CERN collider. AQUA also uses CUDA.
Tullio
ID: 911628 · Report as offensive
walle

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 99
Posts: 5
Credit: 10,823,631
RAC: 32
Sweden
Message 911641 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 13:20:03 UTC

Einstein, primegrid and poem..
ID: 911641 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 911655 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 14:17:06 UTC

I recommend Yoyo and primegrid.
If you are going to do Primegrid I would suggest picking projects that have short WU's Some of their WU's take longer than an Astropulse WU! SO be careful what you pick. They do show the average run time for each project so it's pretty easy to see which are long and short

Yoyo is a great project and always has available work. I recommend the ECM project on YoYo. Its WU's can run from a couple minutes to 5-6 hours.


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 911655 · Report as offensive
Profile Reuben Gathright
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Mar 01
Posts: 213
Credit: 14,594,579
RAC: 0
United States
Message 911664 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 14:29:56 UTC - in response to Message 911609.  

Climate Prediction. Tasks take hundreds of days, with points received for intermediate reports. Plus, the graphics are kind of cool.

Yep, gotta love those graphics in CPDN!
Overclock with the MSI G31M3-L and Intel E8600 3.33Ghz
Intel D865GLC Socket 478 Motherboard
~How To Overclock The Eee ASUS 1005HA Netbook To 1.9Ghz~
ID: 911664 · Report as offensive
Profile mr.mac52
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 03
Posts: 67
Credit: 245,882,461
RAC: 0
United States
Message 911667 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 14:41:10 UTC

The set I work on for times such as this:
Cosmology
Einstein
Milkyway
Rosetta

I can't tell you when the last time I ran out of work with this set of applications.

I do set the shares to favor SETI above all else so that when SETI is down, I still keep all four cores running flat out.

YMMV

John
ID: 911667 · Report as offensive
Profile Dirk Villarreal Wittich
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Apr 00
Posts: 2098
Credit: 434,834
RAC: 0
Holy See (Vatican City)
Message 911675 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 14:49:52 UTC - in response to Message 911664.  

Climate Prediction. Tasks take hundreds of days, with points received for intermediate reports. Plus, the graphics are kind of cool.

Yep, gotta love those graphics in CPDN!



Of course, it depends on your PC´s performances and capabilities to calculate the time needed for each chunk of data.....
but mine takes about one week to crunch the packages, when crunching all the time (24/7).
The report/deadline is quite long, usually one year ahead, so you have plenty of time if you have a slow PC or not too much time available.
One thing that makes me wonder is the date shown on the screensaver:
it shows a past date (two or three decades ago), which makes not too much sense, since this project tries to figure out climate predictions (of the past?)....

ID: 911675 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 911679 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 14:54:38 UTC

Milkyway.

ID: 911679 · Report as offensive
Profile Gundolf Jahn

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 446,358
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 911687 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 15:07:34 UTC - in response to Message 911675.  

One thing that makes me wonder is the date shown on the screensaver:
it shows a past date (two or three decades ago), which makes not too much sense, since this project tries to figure out climate predictions (of the past?)...

If I recall correctly, yes, they predict the past (at least partly) to see if the calculations match reality.

Gruß,
Gundolf
ID: 911687 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 911691 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 15:13:21 UTC - in response to Message 911675.  


Of course, it depends on your PC´s performances and capabilities to calculate the time needed for each chunk of data.....
but mine takes about one week to crunch the packages, when crunching all the time (24/7).
The report/deadline is quite long, usually one year ahead, so you have plenty of time if you have a slow PC or not too much time available.
One thing that makes me wonder is the date shown on the screensaver:
it shows a past date (two or three decades ago), which makes not too much sense, since this project tries to figure out climate predictions (of the past?)....

I think that it checks the correctness of the model. The input data are known from the past meteorological records. If the model is correct it should give as a result today's data and then predict the future data.
Tullio

ID: 911691 · Report as offensive
lemonade lucy

Send message
Joined: 23 Sep 99
Posts: 73
Credit: 1,454,014
RAC: 0
United States
Message 911693 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 15:14:49 UTC - in response to Message 911589.  

Raistmer, as skildude noted, yoyo; has cool things going on (golumb ruler, evolution, particle accel design, and elliptic curve factorization), very dependable as backup, and if you care about these things you get neat virtual badges; good forum support as well. http://www.rechenkraft.net/yoyo/

and in case you have a ps3 looking for work, their cruncher ogr utilizes the SPEs. those running their ps3 247 have rac @ ~2500. I get ~2200 rac. pretty good for $399.
ID: 911693 · Report as offensive
Profile Rick B

Send message
Joined: 6 Mar 01
Posts: 299
Credit: 1,532,791
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 911696 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 15:22:34 UTC - in response to Message 911675.  
Last modified: 26 Jun 2009, 15:25:16 UTC

One thing that makes me wonder is the date shown on the screensaver:
it shows a past date (two or three decades ago), which makes not too much sense, since this project tries to figure out climate predictions (of the past?)....
[/b]


Climate Prediction is my alternate project as well. Depending on the models run they can range from 1 to 2 year analysis to 180 year analysis. I think the dates shown on some of the models are used to compare to historicals actuals to see how the models compared to actual history. This way models prove there viability in future forecasting? (Dont quote me on that - I may be way off base there) Other Models run a 45 year spin up with very little changes in enviromental conditions then the model increases the CO2 amounts (or other pollutants) and run another 45 years to see the temperature and precipitation differences. I'm currently running one that stretches over 180 years and also includes ocean temperature variances. It has 1887:49:15 elapsed time and 877:25:10 to completion. Credits are awarded virtually daily based on amount completed and this particular model will probably award between 45000 and 50000 credits when done.

Edit: Oh and BTW: They to are working through some server issues but hopefully are near the end of them as I understand a new server is on order.
Rick
**************************
ID: 911696 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 911711 - Posted: 26 Jun 2009, 16:04:35 UTC
Last modified: 26 Jun 2009, 16:05:14 UTC

I've not found a project that interested me enough to be a backup project. I crunch SETI and SETI Beta and that's about it.

I'm also more like the average cruncher than the majority of posters: I don't turn computers on just for crunching, I run BOINC on computers that are on because they're needed for other purposes.

If you do have some project as a backup, you do have a small obligation to that project to do some work -- and complete what you get.

"Reliable" is relative. From the project side, one of the goals is to avoid the high costs of high-reliability (redundant servers, redundant connections, etc.). The BOINC client gets around that by supporting multiple projects.

If two projects aren't enough to keep you crunching full-time, add a third (or a fourth).
ID: 911711 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Reliable backup project


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.