your opinion-best spyware & antivirus.

Message boards : Number crunching : your opinion-best spyware & antivirus.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

AuthorMessage
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 899559 - Posted: 26 May 2009, 1:18:34 UTC - in response to Message 899547.  

... and Vista, with all the "security" pop-ups is training people to just click "ok."

I share your disdain for vista - I can't get it to start boinc without it being blocked at startup. Cookiewall however solves the pop-up problem for me - I determine which get always deleted, which get temporarily accepted, and which are always accepted. I also keep and occationally use Firefox as a backup in case someone clobbers my IE. AS WHEN MS TRIED TO FOIST IE8 on me through automatic updates.

Internet Explorer (and Outlook/Outlook Express) have serious security flaws.

If you have Firefox as a backup, it means you aren't using it as your primary browser, and you're hoping that other software on your system adequately blocks threats through Internet Explorer.
ID: 899559 · Report as offensive
Profile dnolan
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 01
Posts: 1228
Credit: 47,779,411
RAC: 32
United States
Message 899570 - Posted: 26 May 2009, 1:52:10 UTC - in response to Message 899405.  
Last modified: 26 May 2009, 1:53:54 UTC

A heads up on ZoneAlarm. I used it exclusively for a few years, on many computers. After experiencing multiple, strange problems with hard drives, system stability, disk corruption, etc., I tried removing ZoneAlarm. The problems went away. SATA hard drives that failed in the past suddenly worked correctly.

ZoneAlarm seems to be fine for very standard PC installations, such as a non-modified laptop. In more advanced installations, I suffered with numerous compatibility issues. This might just be an isolated experience, but it cost me countless hours of troubleshooting.

I like middle of the road stuff, stable and having a large installed base. So I switched to Norton 360. All the hardware issues went away, plus Norton has a 64-bit version. It has worked well so far.

Bob


My experience with Zone Alarm is very similar to this. I was a "pro" user for several years, but after about 10 months of grief that finally all went away when Zone Alarm was removed, I'm now an AVG user... [edit - with windows firewall, defender, and a NAT router...]

-Dave
ID: 899570 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20283
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 899686 - Posted: 26 May 2009, 13:05:48 UTC - in response to Message 899570.  

My experience with Zone Alarm is very similar to this. I was a "pro" user for several years, but ...

Similarly so for myself.

In the past, I spent quite a few hours tweaking up and fine tuning the various firewall settings and various other 'security' enhancements on Windows. Black Viper was and is a good help.

And it is all such a horrible utter waste of time.

I've since learnt that such nonsense is completely unnecessary. There's far better things to do with your time and life.


Happy crunchin',
Martin


See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 899686 · Report as offensive
Profile Aristoteles Doukas
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 08
Posts: 1091
Credit: 2,140,913
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 899953 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 7:27:42 UTC
Last modified: 27 May 2009, 7:28:29 UTC

last year firefox had three times the number of security flaws than ie, so it is not safer by any means.

and i haven´t spent ages twisting and tuning anything else than guitar, and i haven´t learn automatically click ok in vista and i haven´t have single virus on my computer, and just yesterday read major hole in pidgin for all of you linux users, don´t be put on false security.
ID: 899953 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 899964 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 8:42:17 UTC

Linux, Firefox and its addons like NoScript do not cost anything, so I am taking all risks with them. But, if a product is sold, it MUST be safe.
Tullio
ID: 899964 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20283
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 899974 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 9:32:40 UTC - in response to Message 899953.  
Last modified: 27 May 2009, 9:33:28 UTC

last year firefox had three times the number of security flaws than ie, so it is not safer by any means...

Openly published security/bug fixes that is.

Now... How many in the Microsoft stuff that are not published? Microsoft is known to be very secretive and very fond of obfuscation...

How many zero day or days-old exploits live and 'out in the wild'?


Microsoft Marketing is Very Good at playing the obfuscation and numbers game.


Now for much more useful numbers:

How many zombied Linux systems are polluting the internet compared to Microsoft systems? How does that compare in proportion to their utilisation?


You should find that the current Open Source code gets fixed quickly and usually preemptively before you could even get any possibility of world-wide virus silliness as has happened a few times now with Windows systems.

Agreed, there's no room for complacency. Hence why there is the continuous bug fixes and updates for all current Open Source code. There are no viruses 'out in the wild'... yet. I'm sure that you can bet that each and every one example will cause a frenzied world-wide stir. Seen any such examples? (It is likely to happen sometime, be very public, and the stir will lead to an immediate fix in just hours.)


Happy (virus-free) crunchin',
Martin
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 899974 · Report as offensive
EPG

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 110
Credit: 10,416,543
RAC: 0
Hungary
Message 899981 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 9:58:53 UTC
Last modified: 27 May 2009, 10:00:01 UTC

In this big browser debate, I think we must mention Opera. Safe, fast, small, free. For lots of OS and systems (desktop, palm, mobile...) And very good in the web standards.


ID: 899981 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 900087 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 17:03:25 UTC - in response to Message 899953.  

last year firefox had three times the number of security flaws than ie, so it is not safer by any means.

Internet Explorer has something called Active-X.

Active-X is a native windows DLL. Browsing a web site with an Active-X control in IE installs that Active-X control on your machine, just like any other piece of software can be installed.

There was an Active-X "security" demo a few years back that sent the "windows shutdown" message to the system. Browse a web page and watch your computer power off.

For "safety" Microsoft came up with signed controls. All you need to do to be able to sign a control is have a credit card that takes a charge. The control stays signed even if the charge is reversed -- and even if the card you use is stolen.

This is a little bit like comparing "shoplifting" to "murder" -- yeah, security issues, but Active-X is pretty easy to exploit.
ID: 900087 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65745
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 900090 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 17:10:59 UTC - in response to Message 899570.  

A heads up on ZoneAlarm. I used it exclusively for a few years, on many computers. After experiencing multiple, strange problems with hard drives, system stability, disk corruption, etc., I tried removing ZoneAlarm. The problems went away. SATA hard drives that failed in the past suddenly worked correctly.

ZoneAlarm seems to be fine for very standard PC installations, such as a non-modified laptop. In more advanced installations, I suffered with numerous compatibility issues. This might just be an isolated experience, but it cost me countless hours of troubleshooting.

I like middle of the road stuff, stable and having a large installed base. So I switched to Norton 360. All the hardware issues went away, plus Norton has a 64-bit version. It has worked well so far.

Bob


My experience with Zone Alarm is very similar to this. I was a "pro" user for several years, but after about 10 months of grief that finally all went away when Zone Alarm was removed, I'm now an AVG user... [edit - with windows firewall, defender, and a NAT router...]

-Dave

And to think there are Nats and Flying Nats, I get too many bugs, But that's why I have a pest control guy come here every month(Dewey) and so I have only one or two small ones which are easy to dispatch, I hear the sink monster loves them too. ;)

Seriously, Yeah, I hear Ya, I'm going to get out the old 4 port router and replace the 8 port as every once in a while I lose My IP address and as soon as I un plug the thing and let It sit for 10 seconds I get My IP address back, crazy. And no I can't update Its 2002 firmware, I've tried a few times only for the router to not want to accept the file.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 900090 · Report as offensive
rja

Send message
Joined: 13 May 99
Posts: 2
Credit: 12,807,760
RAC: 0
United States
Message 900102 - Posted: 27 May 2009, 17:29:00 UTC
Last modified: 27 May 2009, 17:35:34 UTC

For Microsoft OS's, I have been using Viper from www.sunbeltsoftware.com along with the Sunbelt Personal Firewall. They have reasonable licensing for updates/upgrades and deals for multiple computers if you have a farm of crunchers. I used their Counterspy app for a few years before they came out with Viper. They have versions for XP and Vista, 32 or 64 bit. They claim that it's not a resource hog.
ID: 900102 · Report as offensive
Profile Aristoteles Doukas
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 08
Posts: 1091
Credit: 2,140,913
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 900351 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 5:49:32 UTC - in response to Message 899964.  

Linux, Firefox and its addons like NoScript do not cost anything, so I am taking all risks with them. But, if a product is sold, it MUST be safe.
Tullio




nothing is never safe
ID: 900351 · Report as offensive
Profile Aristoteles Doukas
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 08
Posts: 1091
Credit: 2,140,913
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 900353 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 5:56:47 UTC - in response to Message 900087.  

last year firefox had three times the number of security flaws than ie, so it is not safer by any means.

Internet Explorer has something called Active-X.

Active-X is a native windows DLL. Browsing a web site with an Active-X control in IE installs that Active-X control on your machine, just like any other piece of software can be installed.

There was an Active-X "security" demo a few years back that sent the "windows shutdown" message to the system. Browse a web page and watch your computer power off.

For "safety" Microsoft came up with signed controls. All you need to do to be able to sign a control is have a credit card that takes a charge. The control stays signed even if the charge is reversed -- and even if the card you use is stolen.

This is a little bit like comparing "shoplifting" to "murder" -- yeah, security issues, but Active-X is pretty easy to exploit.



and it is even easier to stop ie to use active-x, wait, oh it was alrady set like that, no active-x will do nothing in this ie.
ID: 900353 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65745
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 900357 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 6:15:00 UTC

Today I just upgraded the firmware on My Linksys BEFSR81 8 port v2 Router from 2.44.2(2002) to 2.45.10(2004) and the 2.45.10 is the latest and since It's a v2 Router and is out of production I doubt there will be any newer firmware coming along anymore. I would be nice If My Router didn't need to be rebooted every month, But I'll find out If that will happen or not then.

Linksys wrote:
Firmware Date	 : June 3, 2004
Current Firmware : Version 2.45.10
Product PartNo	 : BEFSR81 v2

Note: This code will not work with version 3.

Ver #.		Date		Description
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.45.10		Jun 3,04	1. Added Multicast IGMP Proxy function
				2. Added Filter Internet NAT Redirection option 
				   to disable local LAN users from accessing port 
                                   forwarded services in the router
				3. Added CGI string attacks prevention
				4. Fixed UPnP issue with Windows XP SP2
				5. Fixed BOOTP response to DHCP server
				6. Modified DHCP server to fill the siaddr to the
				   server address.
				7. NAT-T issue. Linux will reply the long packet 
				   echo reply out of order.
				8. Modified MTU/MRU response.
				9. Modified Support PPPoE/L2TP/PPTP fragmentation
				10. Modified RFC 3360. TCP RST handling
				11. Fixed buffer leakage bug.
				12. Added the DHCP option 55 support.
				13. Added Filter IDENT(Port 113) to block that port
				    from port scan.
				14. Fixed DHCP lease time being too large will cause the router 
				    to request IP every 1 min
				15. Fixed port forwarding disabled will still allow access through
                                    the WAN
				16. Fixed fast web upgrade displaying correctly in web browsers
				17. Modified PPTP max MTU size from 1400 to 1460  When enable 
				    PPTP or PPPoE WAN connection type that MTU won't be enable 
				    automatically.
				18. Fixed remote port number not working correctly
				19. Fixed multicast UDP fragment packets (Media server
				 in WAN) from the WAN will cause the router to reboot 
				20. Fixed Cisco response VPN pass-through (UDP+ESP) 
				    packets connection to disconnect 
				21. Fixed DNS will not query if DMZ is enabled 
				22. Added support system information page 
				23. Modified MSN L2L for proper support for 4.7 and 5.0 connect.


2.44.2		Dec. 13,02	1. Fixed UPnP functions
<SNIP>
v1.34		Aug 17,00

The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 900357 · Report as offensive
Profile elbea64

Send message
Joined: 16 Aug 99
Posts: 114
Credit: 6,352,198
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 900396 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 8:47:36 UTC

Firefox in its downloadable state needs add-ons to become usable, the first installed add-on makes any security of firefox - if it exists - useless, as there's no control over the security of add-ons namely not even signing
ID: 900396 · Report as offensive
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 900412 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 9:35:06 UTC

I have installed in Firefox ForecastFox, NoScript and Moonlight. No problem.
Tullio
ID: 900412 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 900511 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 15:20:32 UTC - in response to Message 900412.  

I have installed in Firefox ForecastFox, NoScript and Moonlight. No problem.
Tullio

don't forget to put adblock plus on firefox



In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 900511 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 900616 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 19:53:53 UTC - in response to Message 900396.  

Firefox in its downloadable state needs add-ons to become usable, the first installed add-on makes any security of firefox - if it exists - useless, as there's no control over the security of add-ons namely not even signing

"Signing" only helps if you can trust the signers -- and their procedures.
ID: 900616 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20283
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 900727 - Posted: 28 May 2009, 23:45:17 UTC - in response to Message 900353.  

... and it is even easier to stop ie to use active-x, wait, oh it was alrady set like that, no active-x will do nothing in this ie.

Ahhhh... But what about that darn all powerful DirectShow dll thingie?

Get Must-Have Fix for New Microsoft DirectShow Flaw

A critical new zero-day flaw involving Microsoft DirectShow's processing of QuickTime content is under attack, Microsoft reported today ... affects Windows XP, 2000, and Server 2003. Windows Vista, Server 2008, and Windows 7 are not affected.

[...]

"a browser-based vector is potentially accessible through any browser..."


Fresh in the news 28th May.

Good luck,
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 900727 · Report as offensive
Profile Aristoteles Doukas
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 08
Posts: 1091
Credit: 2,140,913
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 900831 - Posted: 29 May 2009, 3:10:31 UTC

i run vista, and why i would use quicktime, this is not mac.
ID: 900831 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 900836 - Posted: 29 May 2009, 3:46:41 UTC - in response to Message 900831.  

i run vista, and why i would use quicktime, this is not mac.

Why would Microsoft support Quicktime in DirectShow if Quicktime was not important?
ID: 900836 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : your opinion-best spyware & antivirus.


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.