Validation inconclusive

Message boards : Number crunching : Validation inconclusive
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 893725 - Posted: 11 May 2009, 21:34:36 UTC - in response to Message 893723.  
Last modified: 11 May 2009, 21:37:26 UTC

I have 26 of those "validate errors" all reported 11 May 18:53:40 UTC.

I wonder if that matches today's Technical News:

... some result uploads were failing for a minute or two there.

Validate errors and bad uploads usually go together.

Edit: I had half-a-dozen at 11 May 2009 18:51:13 UTC.
ID: 893725 · Report as offensive
Stick Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 00
Posts: 100
Credit: 5,283,449
RAC: 5
United States
Message 893783 - Posted: 12 May 2009, 1:11:49 UTC
Last modified: 12 May 2009, 1:13:18 UTC

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=435875813

I reported the above WU earlier when only 3 inconclusive results had been returned. The 4th result is now in and credit has been granted to 3 of the 4. Since mine was one of the lucky 3, I'm not complaining; but, I wonder why it wasn't settled with "the best 2 out of 3".
ID: 893783 · Report as offensive
Josef W. Segur
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 99
Posts: 4504
Credit: 1,414,761
RAC: 0
United States
Message 893835 - Posted: 12 May 2009, 3:01:20 UTC - in response to Message 893783.  

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=435875813

I reported the above WU earlier when only 3 inconclusive results had been returned. The 4th result is now in and credit has been granted to 3 of the 4. Since mine was one of the lucky 3, I'm not complaining; but, I wonder why it wasn't settled with "the best 2 out of 3".

It's not 'the best 2...", it requires 2 with signals which fully match. There's even a possibility that in 11 'success' result files no pair will match and no host will be granted credit, though the odds against that are ridiculously high.

Without a real match they'd have to guess which set of signals to put in the science database. The host records do have an error_rate field which might be used to choose which host is more likely correct, but it wouldn't be very good science.
                                                                Joe
ID: 893835 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 894725 - Posted: 14 May 2009, 20:42:08 UTC - in response to Message 893716.  

Found some "validate error"s from ca. 11 May 2009 18:50:57 UTC
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=438442777
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=438353803
Hopefully the database is not "leaking" too much of our results.

Two bits of good news:

1) Those WUs, and one of mine, have all been validated (my other ones were all shorties, so they must have been purged already). Looks like the clean-up crew have been busy - thanks again.

2) There was a website bug which meant you couldn't find these errors using the list filters. Any future ones will be included in the "Invalid" category, so they will be easier to find and report. ([trac]changeset:18104[/trac] - thanks David)
ID: 894725 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : Number crunching : Validation inconclusive


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.