80% bad Wu's?


Advanced search

Questions and Answers : Getting started : 80% bad Wu's?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Andy

Send message
Joined: 8 Jan 08
Posts: 1
Credit: 5,217
RAC: 0
Message 888401 - Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 3:55:46 UTC

Just restarted doing WU's and 80% of them are failing
to initialize. It gets to optimizing stage and fails
to go to baseline smoothing, won't begin work on the
unit. I have NEVER had this problem before, what has
happened to the program?
ID: 888401 · Report as offensive
Profile Gundolf Jahn

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 446,358
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 888420 - Posted: 26 Apr 2009, 7:34:31 UTC - in response to Message 888401.  

You didn't restart doing WUs, you started aborting them ;-)

But indeed, only one single task ended with "Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1)".

Gruß,
Gundolf
Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz)

SETI@home classic workunits 3,758
SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours
ID: 888420 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 888810 - Posted: 27 Apr 2009, 17:06:56 UTC

you are having this:
Unhandled Exception Record -
Reason: Breakpoint Encountered (0x80000003) at address 0x7C901230

M$ support page talking about your error

in this case it looks like "aborted by user" means his local PC couldnt process the WU and killed it.


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 888810 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : Getting started : 80% bad Wu's?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.