Performance of PCI Cuda Cards

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Performance of PCI Cuda Cards
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 887895 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 13:17:18 UTC

I bought an EVGA 8400GS PCI video card to give my little CUDA machine a boost. It seems to be running very slow - takes about 2 and a half times as long to crunch an equivalent unit as the 8600GT PCIE card in the same machine. 2hrs 15min as against 40 min for a 38 credit (validated value) unit.

What crunching times are others getting out of an 8400 and is the slowness due to the card or is it the PCI bus ?

Brodo
ID: 887895 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 887967 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 17:15:35 UTC - in response to Message 887895.  
Last modified: 24 Apr 2009, 17:28:06 UTC

I think I've answered my own question. Was running BOINC 6.4.5 when I made the original post. Have just updated to 6.6.20. This verson tells me the 8600GT rates at 14 GFlops and the 8400GS only rates at 4 GFlops.

How does 4 GF's compare to the PCIE version of the 8400 card ? Anyone know ?

[edit] Further to this, Has anyone tried the Sparkle 9400 PCI card discussed on these boards a couple of weeks ago ? If so could you please post your results [/edit]

Brodo
ID: 887967 · Report as offensive
FiveHamlet
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 99
Posts: 783
Credit: 32,638,578
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 887990 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 19:13:59 UTC - in response to Message 887967.  

My Palit 9600gt is rated at 37gflops. I dont know how much lower the 8600gs would be.
My 9600gts do Cuda in around 25 mins,with .13 cpu usage.
Dave
ID: 887990 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 887995 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 19:43:34 UTC - in response to Message 887990.  
Last modified: 24 Apr 2009, 19:48:11 UTC

Thanks for the info but I'm really after figures for PCI bus video cards rather than PCIe cards. Unless it's an 8400 so I can get a direct comparison between the PCI and the PCIe versions.

I thought an 8400 was capable of better than 4GFlops ? Would fitting a dummy plug to the monitor o/p help?

Brodo
ID: 887995 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 888012 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 20:16:41 UTC - in response to Message 887995.  
Last modified: 24 Apr 2009, 20:20:05 UTC

Hi, I have 1 QUAD 6600 with a 8500GT, estimated 5GFLOP's and a QX9650 with a 9800GTX, estimated 84GFLOP's.
Both PCI-E x16, which is a must, considering bandwhith
Don't expect much from PCI cards, as only the bus is a bottleneck, AGP should do enough througput.
ID: 888012 · Report as offensive
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20265
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 888018 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 20:37:37 UTC - in response to Message 888012.  

... Don't expect much from PCI cards, as only the bus is a bottleneck, AGP should do enough througput.

And AGP is asymmetric. CPU -> GPU is fast-ish but the return trip is painfully slow.

Happy crunchin',
Martin

See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 888018 · Report as offensive
Profile Raistmer
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 01
Posts: 6325
Credit: 106,370,077
RAC: 121
Russia
Message 888048 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 21:52:27 UTC - in response to Message 888018.  

25/04/2009 01:44:16 CUDA device: GeForce 8500 GT (driver version 18250, CUDA version 1.1, 256MB, est. 5GFLOPS)

PCI-E bus here
ID: 888048 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14650
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 888054 - Posted: 24 Apr 2009, 22:06:52 UTC

According to nVidia documentation, brodo's 8400GS has the same number of processing units (shaders), running at the same speed, as Raistmer's 8500 GT, but only half the internal memory bandwidth. Doesn't say anything about the external (bus) bandwidth, though.
ID: 888054 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 888170 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 4:41:00 UTC
Last modified: 25 Apr 2009, 5:17:37 UTC

Oh Well - it looka like my 8400GS compares pretty well then as far as GFlops goes. I don't expect it to be as fast as a PCIe unit but I would like to get an idea of how much the performance drops compared to PCIe.

@ Raistmer and Fred. What crunching times are you getting out of your 8500's ? My 8400 is taking around 1.5 to 2.5 hours for a "typical" unit and about 4.5 hrs for a VLAR. I don't mind the VLAR time, it's still quicker than the P4 that's driving it. :-)

Brodo
ID: 888170 · Report as offensive
Profile Byron S Goodgame
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 1145
Credit: 3,936,993
RAC: 0
United States
Message 888171 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 4:55:23 UTC

Thanks for sharing this Brodo. I thought PCI CUDA was a dead subject months ago.
ID: 888171 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 888179 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 5:38:54 UTC - in response to Message 888171.  
Last modified: 25 Apr 2009, 5:46:11 UTC

Thanks for sharing this Brodo. I thought PCI CUDA was a dead subject months ago.

I'm interested because I see it as a cheap upgrade to an old box. It may also be of interest to anyone else still running a P4 who would like a bit more grunt but doesn't want to shell out for a new system or those who MoBo's only have one PCIe slot.

Since I upgraded to 6.6.20 I can now run units on the CPU as well. With the 2 CUDA cards and using hyperthreading I now crunch 4 units at once. The PCIe 8600GT takes approx 45 mins/unit, the PCI 8400GS takes approx 1.5 hrs/unit and AK_v8 on the 2 virtual CPU's around 5-6 Hrs/unit This gives the potential for an RAC of just above 2000 (up from 600 with the naked P4). Not bad for a P4 sytem and an outlay of around $200 (less if you use $US).

I'd like to try the Sparkle 9400 PCI card but they're only available in the US and New Egg doesn't take credit card or PayPal for overseas orders, the company I deal with in The States doesn't sell it.

Brodo
ID: 888179 · Report as offensive
Profile Byron S Goodgame
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 1145
Credit: 3,936,993
RAC: 0
United States
Message 888190 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 7:50:08 UTC - in response to Message 888179.  


I'm interested because I see it as a cheap upgrade to an old box. It may also be of interest to anyone else still running a P4 who would like a bit more grunt but doesn't want to shell out for a new system or those who MoBo's only have one PCIe slot.

I agree, and was the main reason I was interested in it a few months ago as well. I have several older AMD systems that could benefit from a PCI CUDA card ;-)
ID: 888190 · Report as offensive
Terror Australis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 14 Feb 04
Posts: 1817
Credit: 262,693,308
RAC: 44
Australia
Message 888193 - Posted: 25 Apr 2009, 8:07:04 UTC - in response to Message 888190.  


I'm interested because I see it as a cheap upgrade to an old box. It may also be of interest to anyone else still running a P4 who would like a bit more grunt but doesn't want to shell out for a new system or those who MoBo's only have one PCIe slot.

I agree, and was the main reason I was interested in it a few months ago as well. I have several older AMD systems that could benefit from a PCI CUDA card ;-)



If your interested in how things go, Keep an eye on this computer 4735693

Brodo
ID: 888193 · Report as offensive
The Weasel

Send message
Joined: 6 Jun 99
Posts: 127
Credit: 53,205,208
RAC: 0
United States
Message 890556 - Posted: 2 May 2009, 14:38:09 UTC

I recently added a 8600gts 256ddr3 PCI card to an old system, the highest PCI card i could find, est. 17GFLOPs. found it on newegg or tigerdirect for $50. runs a little warm for me, about 80C, but i have an upgraded cooler on order for it from tigerdirect: Thermaltake SOrb, hope that helps you. It has recently improved my RAC.
ID: 890556 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Performance of PCI Cuda Cards


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.