Questions and Answers :
Unix/Linux :
I assume I have a Linux problem
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
Odd error. The BOINC manager says I'm using app 0.07 for the MB. thats odd I don't have nor has Seti sent an app 0.07 and my app_info doesnt say anything about 0.07. I havent been able to find the error on the FAQs at Mundayweb. In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
It says 0.06 But that aside, what are the app versions in your client_state.xml file? |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
0.06 ok I'll have to look when I get home. In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
the multibeam ap said version number <6> I assume that should be 603 In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Well yes, but where is it getting that info from? Are you sure all the numbers in your app_info.xml file are correct and that BOINC is using that app_info.xml file (not another one)? There's no use changing the app version in your client_state.xml file as that will be overwritten the next time the application is started. |
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 |
OK I assumed that the SSE version of the Opt ap can run the seti 6.03 WU's. I fixed the app_info it looks like I had it as 6.03 instead of the 603. if I can only run 5.28 apps then I'll redo the app_info again In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I fixed the app_info it looks like I had it as 6.03 instead of the 603. That'll do it, yes. The app version numbers in app_info.xml do not use a decimal period such as the application names do; it'll be dividing the app number by 100 (for major numbering) while anything behind the decimal point will then drop off due to app version numbers only having two minor numbers. So <version_num>6.03</version_num> will come out as version 0.06, <version_num>60.3</version_num> as 0.60 and <version_num>603</version_num> as 6.03 |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.