No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0


log in

Advanced search

Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0

1 · 2 · Next
Author Message
parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 875810 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 15:44:22 UTC

Started seeing these errors after the Tuesday outage? Running the optimized package found here: http://www.arkayn.us/seti/
LX64_AKV8_AP5_SSSE3.tar.gz Linux 64-bit SSSE3 version for Intel Only - Transitional With both AP app r103 and AP v5 r112-64 bit


Any ideas?


15-Mar-2009 02:24:55 [SETI@home] Finished download of ap_03ja09aa_B0_P1_00050_20090314_19476.wu
15-Mar-2009 02:24:34 [SETI@home] Started download of ap_03ja09aa_B0_P1_00050_20090314_19476.wu
15-Mar-2009 02:24:32 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
15-Mar-2009 02:24:27 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 163753 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
15-Mar-2009 02:23:27 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
15-Mar-2009 02:23:27 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
15-Mar-2009 02:23:22 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 163626 seconds of work, reporting 2 completed tasks


15-Mar-2009 10:45:56 [SETI@home] Finished download of ap_12dc08aa_B6_P0_00270_20090212_30606.wu
15-Mar-2009 10:45:30 [SETI@home] Started download of ap_12dc08aa_B6_P0_00270_20090212_30606.wu
15-Mar-2009 10:45:28 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
15-Mar-2009 10:45:23 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 13584 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
15-Mar-2009 10:44:22 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
15-Mar-2009 10:44:22 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
15-Mar-2009 10:44:17 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 13456 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks


____________

Profile Ageless
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 12259
Credit: 2,554,809
RAC: 801
Netherlands
Message 875811 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 15:52:43 UTC - in response to Message 875810.

Make sure all your binaries are still in place. It sounds like you're missing the astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu application, as it's the only one in the app_info.xml file that's coming close to what BOINC says isn't there.
____________
Jord

Fighting for the correct use of the apostrophe, together with Weird Al Yankovic

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 875863 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 17:57:45 UTC - in response to Message 875811.

BOINC client version 6.4.5 for i686-pc-linux-gnu

The three files are in place

AK_V8_linux64_ssse3
astropulse-5.03.x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu

The file names match the contents of app_info.xml


<app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>AK_V8_linux64_ssse3</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>603</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>AK_V8_linux64_ssse3</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse</app_name>
<version_num>500</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse_v5</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>astropulse-5.03.x86_64-pc-linux-gnu</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse_v5</app_name>
<version_num>503</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>astropulse-5.03.x86_64-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>


____________

Profile Ageless
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 12259
Credit: 2,554,809
RAC: 801
Netherlands
Message 875954 - Posted: 15 Mar 2009, 22:02:49 UTC - in response to Message 875863.
Last modified: 15 Mar 2009, 22:03:10 UTC

Well, according to your computer you're not returning any erroneous tasks, so it all seems to be working. There just isn't much work for Astropulse 5.00, although there is lots of work for Astropulse v5 5.03, so perhaps that it's just warning that there's no work for the application you have chosen, but you're not seeing that as it may be low level messages.

If you want, make a cc_config.xml file in your BOINC Data directory.
Add into it (copy and paste):

<cc_config>
<log_flags>
<sched_op_debug>1</sched_op_debug>
<file_xfer_debug>1</file_xfer_debug>
</log_flags>
</cc_config>

Make sure that when you save the file that it doesn't get an extra extension.
Then open BOINC Manager->Advanced view->Advanced->Read config file

And wait for it to happen again.
____________
Jord

Fighting for the correct use of the apostrophe, together with Weird Al Yankovic

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 876675 - Posted: 17 Mar 2009, 22:22:00 UTC - in response to Message 875954.
Last modified: 17 Mar 2009, 22:23:24 UTC

Well, I just found three more error messages. I don't see anything obvious in the log file that would explain it. Tasks for computer 4779644 now show three fresh WU's "In Progress", even tho they are not on my computer.

ap_12ja09af_B0_P0_00391_20090308_04175.wu_3 WU-ID# 422267597
ap_11ja09aa_B2_P0_00367_20090317_05854.wu_0 WU-ID# 425143699
ap_17ja09aa_B0_P1_00396_20090215_21945.wu_2 WU-ID# 415037613


17-Mar-2009 17:58:14 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] Starting scheduler request
17-Mar-2009 17:58:14 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 294126 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 3 new tasks
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] Project requested delay of 11.000000 seconds
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] estimated total job duration: 0 seconds
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] Deferring communication for 2 min 55 sec
17-Mar-2009 17:59:04 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] Reason: no work from project


Here is a list of the WU's in the ../project/setiathome.berkeley.edu directory


Mar 16 21:36 ap_03ja09ae_B0_P0_00021_20090316_07111.wu - running now
Mar 16 21:36 ap_13ja09ag_B5_P1_00313_20090316_00523.wu
Mar 16 11:24 ap_28dc08aa_B5_P0_00264_20090316_20962.wu - running now
Mar 16 10:00 ap_28dc08aa_B5_P0_00046_20090316_20962.wu - running now
Mar 15 17:19 ap_03ja09ab_B1_P1_00056_20090315_15163.wu - running now

____________

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 877104 - Posted: 19 Mar 2009, 3:34:47 UTC

Happened again. Server thinks WU has been successfully downloaded, when in fact it hasn't

http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=424688033


18-Mar-2009 23:16:39 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] Starting scheduler request
18-Mar-2009 23:16:39 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 155 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
18-Mar-2009 23:16:44 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
18-Mar-2009 23:16:44 [SETI@home] Project requested delay of 11.000000 seconds
18-Mar-2009 23:16:44 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
18-Mar-2009 23:16:44 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] estimated total job duration: 0 seconds
18-Mar-2009 23:16:44 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
18-Mar-2009 23:16:44 [SETI@home] [sched_op_debug] Reason: no work from project



____________

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 877941 - Posted: 21 Mar 2009, 17:55:42 UTC

More of the same


21-Mar-2009 13:43:44 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 384950 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 12 new tasks
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:44:55 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
21-Mar-2009 13:45:55 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 384950 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
21-Mar-2009 13:46:10 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
k21-Mar-2009 13:46:10 [SETI@home] Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)


____________

Profile Gundolf Jahn
Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 19
Germany
Message 877968 - Posted: 21 Mar 2009, 18:47:21 UTC - in response to Message 877941.

Is perhaps the file astropulse-5.03.x86_64-pc-linux-gnu missing the executable flag or otherwise buggy (check sum)?

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 877981 - Posted: 21 Mar 2009, 19:20:37 UTC

I downloaded a fresh copy from Crunch3r's page http://calbe.dw70.de/linux32.html - extracted the binary and compared the executable and md5sum of the one I got previously from arkyn's page http://www.arkayn.us/seti/ - and they appear to be identical


-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2982252 Mar 14 23:19 astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2982252 Jan 24 08:51 astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu

ef016c537317383126913c0efb6e9cc6 astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu
ef016c537317383126913c0efb6e9cc6 astropulse-5.0.i686-pc-linux-gnu


____________

Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 3597
Credit: 47,404,553
RAC: 6,094
United States
Message 877987 - Posted: 21 Mar 2009, 19:33:10 UTC - in response to Message 877981.
Last modified: 21 Mar 2009, 19:35:11 UTC

Under properties-Permissions, who is listed as the Owner and Group?

Owner should be "boinc - BOINC core client" and group should be "boinc"
____________

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 878000 - Posted: 21 Mar 2009, 19:55:01 UTC - in response to Message 877987.

boinc is running on root account
____________

Profile ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 8273
Credit: 4,072,596
RAC: 347
United Kingdom
Message 878552 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 11:39:23 UTC

I'm suspicious of why you're seeing "i686-pc-linux-gnu 0" being listed. Should that not just simply be "i686-pc-linux-gnu"?

What do you get from the commandline for the following two commands?

uname -a

echo $CHOST



Good luck,
Martin

____________
See new freedom: Mageia4
Linux Voice See & try out your OS Freedom!
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 878574 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 14:44:11 UTC

This machine runs CentOS 5.2 linux (64bit)

model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
cpu MHz : 3010.108
cache size : 6144 KB
21-Mar-2009 13:58:40 [---] Memory: 1.96 GB physical, 1.94 GB virtual
18-Mar-2009 15:24:59 [---] Number of CPUs: 2
18-Mar-2009 15:24:59 [---] 1912 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
18-Mar-2009 15:24:59 [---] 4967 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

#uname -a

Linux conroe11.parkut.com 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 11:57:43 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

#echo $CHOST

does not return anything

===========

I get the same error message on my quad processor. I started getting these messages late in the evening of March 8th.

____________

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 878643 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 19:11:39 UTC

Thanks for your help and suggestions to date.

To help isolate the problem, I have stripped out all but the astropulse v5 from the app_info.xml file, and changed my computing preferences to only give me astropulse v5 work units.

____________

Profile ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 8273
Credit: 4,072,596
RAC: 347
United Kingdom
Message 878660 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 20:01:42 UTC

OK... So you're on a 64-bit system and running with an app_info.xml...

If you want to run 32-bit applications, have you got the 32-bit libs installed?

Are you running a 64-bit version of Boinc?

Does everything work ok without the app_info?

Can you attach and run any other projects ok?

Which version of Boinc are you running?

What changed around the time things ceased working?

Good luck,
Martin

____________
See new freedom: Mageia4
Linux Voice See & try out your OS Freedom!
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 878681 - Posted: 23 Mar 2009, 20:42:58 UTC

32-bit libs - yes
32 bit version of boinc
The computers ran "stock" (non-optimized) Seti@Home just fine
The computer is also attached to Einstein@Home
Running BOINC client version 6.4.5 for i686-pc-linux-gnu
What changed as far as I can remember was installing the optimized versions.

____________

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 878845 - Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 13:40:01 UTC
Last modified: 24 Mar 2009, 14:01:50 UTC

Happened again, even with the stripped down app_info.xml. Server assigned a WU for application Astropulse v5, yet I received the error.

wuid=427018706


24-Mar-2009 05:49:44 [SETI@home] Computation for task ap_13ja09af_B6_P1_00241_20090221_01479.wu_6 finished
24-Mar-2009 05:49:44 [SETI@home] Starting ap_14fe09aa_B4_P0_00120_20090323_27988.wu_0
24-Mar-2009 05:49:44 [SETI@home] Starting task ap_14fe09aa_B4_P0_00120_20090323_27988.wu_0 using astropulse_v5 version 503
24-Mar-2009 05:49:45 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 10314 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks
24-Mar-2009 05:49:46 [SETI@home] Started upload of ap_13ja09af_B6_P1_00241_20090221_01479.wu_6_0
24-Mar-2009 05:49:49 [SETI@home] Finished upload of ap_13ja09af_B6_P1_00241_20090221_01479.wu_6_0
24-Mar-2009 05:49:50 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
24-Mar-2009 05:49:50 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0
24-Mar-2009 05:50:51 [SETI@home] Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 10655 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks
24-Mar-2009 05:50:56 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks
24-Mar-2009 05:50:58 [SETI@home] Started download of ap_14fe09ab_B4_P1_00006_20090324_01308.wu
24-Mar-2009 05:51:46 [SETI@home] Finished download of ap_14fe09ab_B4_P1_00006_20090324_01308.wu

____________

Profile Gundolf Jahn
Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 19
Germany
Message 878860 - Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 15:11:11 UTC - in response to Message 878845.

24-Mar-2009 05:49:50 [SETI@home] [error] No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0

I have to agree with ML1: the "0" is very suspicious. Perhaps you should do a grep -w "0" client_state.xml (or look with an editor for single zeros).

BTW, the link you provided is only useful after reporting the task.

Gruß,
Gundolf
____________
Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz)

SETI@home classic workunits 3,758
SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 878885 - Posted: 24 Mar 2009, 20:20:06 UTC

I was attempting to point out that the WU in question shows as a v5 downloaded and assigned to my computer. Yet, it actually failed to download, or was otherwise deleted by the client. I find no trace of it on my machine.

____________

parkut
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 99
Posts: 69
Credit: 9,779,243
RAC: 0
United States
Message 879176 - Posted: 25 Mar 2009, 19:54:24 UTC

With the current outage, my computer has completed and returned all work to berkeley. The link below gives a view to all of the vanished results. From my quick look at the individual work units listed, they all appear to be v5 astropulse.

Orphaned Work Units

I examined the client_state.xml file and did not see anything related to Seti and the "0" as was suggested - to look for an application version number perhaps?


____________

1 · 2 · Next

Questions and Answers : Unix/Linux : No app version for result: i686-pc-linux-gnu 0

Copyright © 2014 University of California