Nasir (Mar 05 2009)

Message boards : Technical News : Nasir (Mar 05 2009)

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Matt Lebofsky
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 1441
Credit: 213,689
RAC: 0
United States
Message 872638 - Posted: 5 Mar 2009, 22:01:59 UTC

Once again not much hardware/server stuff to report. I guess the ap_validator "2" is failing due to seg faults. A fact that is obscured on the server status page (due to automatic parsing of configuration files) is that the ap_validator "2" does strictly astropulse_v5 workunits, while ap_validator "1" validates older astropulse workunits. In any case, I warned Josh, he's looking into it, etc. Probably a broken result file/database entry is causing it to seg fault and quit before doing very much.

Today was mostly conceptualizing/programming again for me, though focused back on radar blanking stuff as I should really get this done. I'm getting bogged down with "ragged files" - where the chunks of data aren't nearly ordered, thus causing confusion about where the software/hardware blanking bits are. This usually isn't a problem, except when a particular raw data file is ragged at the top or bottom, and the chunk containing blanking information needed by adjacent chunks is actually at the end of the previous file, or at the beginning of the next, or nowhere to be found at all.

- Matt


-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person
-- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude

ID: 872638 · Report as offensive
Profile Neil Blaikie
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 142
Credit: 6,652,341
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 872642 - Posted: 5 Mar 2009, 22:09:36 UTC

Thank you as always for the update.

Hope you manage to progress with the Blanking code soon, your work will be very much appreciated by all, no matter how long it takes to complete.

Yosemite thread titles for this month? ? :-)


ID: 872642 · Report as offensive
Profile gizbar
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 01
Posts: 586
Credit: 21,087,774
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 872764 - Posted: 6 Mar 2009, 6:12:59 UTC - in response to Message 872638.

Once again not much hardware/server stuff to report. I guess the ap_validator "2" is failing due to seg faults. A fact that is obscured on the server status page (due to automatic parsing of configuration files) is that the ap_validator "2" does strictly astropulse_v5 workunits, while ap_validator "1" validates older astropulse workunits. In any case, I warned Josh, he's looking into it, etc. Probably a broken result file/database entry is causing it to seg fault and quit before doing very much.


- Matt


Thanks for the info Matt. I guess that's why my pendings are so high for astropulse.

regards, Gizbar.



A proud GPU User Server Donor!

ID: 872764 · Report as offensive
Invisible Man

Send message
Joined: 24 Jun 01
Posts: 22
Credit: 1,129,336
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 873533 - Posted: 7 Mar 2009, 22:00:11 UTC - in response to Message 872764.

I don't care what they say, seti or not. The answer is still 42 !

From one Brit to another, I always thought "The answer was a Lemon".

ID: 873533 · Report as offensive
archae86

Send message
Joined: 31 Aug 99
Posts: 909
Credit: 1,582,816
RAC: 0
United States
Message 873563 - Posted: 7 Mar 2009, 23:55:47 UTC - in response to Message 872638.

I guess the ap_validator "2" is failing due to seg faults.
It came to life a little while ago, and has already run the reported WU waiting for validation number down to one from a peak near twelve thousand.

ID: 873563 · Report as offensive
Profile Bigsheff1
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 24 Apr 03
Posts: 4
Credit: 1,007,969
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 873851 - Posted: 8 Mar 2009, 21:54:18 UTC

Well I am gratefull for these post by you Matt, never had so much fun reading them keep up the good work, I need to play lottery to help you out, (Dream on)

Cheers Dude


ID: 873851 · Report as offensive
PhonAcq

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 01
Posts: 1629
Credit: 28,516,870
RAC: 3,256
United States
Message 874057 - Posted: 9 Mar 2009, 14:51:30 UTC

<ying>
I, for one, want to commend Matt and related staff for what appears to be a very stable server system in recent days. Things seem to be rock solid and no obvious problems. Plus, the system seems robust enough to handle the mid-night bursts of traffic. Good job!
</ying>

<yang>
Now what is on the agenda to improve things to the next level of performance??
</yang>

ID: 874057 · Report as offensive
Profile RandyC
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 99
Posts: 714
Credit: 1,704,345
RAC: 0
United States
Message 874062 - Posted: 9 Mar 2009, 15:20:22 UTC - in response to Message 874057.


<yang>
Now what is on the agenda to improve things to the next level of performance??
</yang>


Convincing people not to remark on how well things are going, so we can avoid the wrath of Murphy. ;)

ID: 874062 · Report as offensive
PhonAcq

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 01
Posts: 1629
Credit: 28,516,870
RAC: 3,256
United States
Message 874085 - Posted: 9 Mar 2009, 17:01:54 UTC

I respect Murphy, but Matt et all need a few kudos from us "rational objectivists" at times.

ID: 874085 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Technical News : Nasir (Mar 05 2009)


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.