pending credits |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : pending credits
Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 . . . 15 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Most of mine is definitely AP. The ratios are interesting. Ahh, I have 68,287.64 pending with a RAC of 6,800.79. That would suggest my RAC hasn't leveled out yet since it is at 10:1. Possible RAC direction could be 68k/7.6 = 8.9k.. would be just that little bit on the low side (the goal is 10k). But my order (AMD Phenom ][ 940) is has arived today and is now waiting to be installed :D :D 10k RAC here I come ;) ____________ The SETI@Home Gauntlet 2012 april 16 - 30| info / chat | STATS | |
| ID: 885521 · | |
|
I have an idea for reducing the pending APs and thus shortening the TTL (time-to-live) of AP work units. Most important effect would possibly be to reduce the load on the database. | |
| ID: 885529 · | |
I have an idea for reducing the pending APs and thus shortening the TTL (time-to-live) of AP work units. Most important effect would possibly be to reduce the load on the database. Annddd that would be? ____________ Proud member of TSWB. End terrorism by building a school | |
| ID: 885542 · | |
Annddd that would be? a) Reduce quorum to 1 b) Stop sending AP's c) Something else? LOL | |
| ID: 885545 · | |
I have an idea for reducing the pending APs and thus shortening the TTL (time-to-live) of AP work units. Most important effect would possibly be to reduce the load on the database. I thought you'd never ask. :) How's that for baiting? Call it eHarmony for work units. When a client reports a completed work unit, the validator as part of it's normal validation process could mark the other "in progress" task with a flag saying to the effect "ready for wingman". Then, the next time the wingman's client communicates with the host, it could pick up that flag and use it as part of the client's logic for determining high-priority tasks. So the client would always work on "ready" tasks first. The trick would be to make sure those tasks don't interfere with truly high-priority tasks based on deadline. I'm sure I haven't quite clearly described this thoroughly. I'm still trying to wrap my head around it. ____________ "Life is a tragedy for those who feel, and a comedy for those who think." "I never get into an argument that I cannot win." | |
| ID: 885546 · | |
Annddd that would be? Get Seti management to send MB's to CUDA only and then for cpu it is AP or nothing. Or get MB app written to work on the 8 MB files, i.e. not split into 350 KB chunks, which was done originally at the beginning of Classic because most of us where on slow speed dial-up, and then for one download we could do MB and AP processing with a 50% credit bonus for doing both parts. | |
| ID: 885549 · | |
Call it eHarmony for work units. When a client reports a completed work unit, the validator as part of it's normal validation process could mark the other "in progress" task with a flag saying to the effect "ready for wingman". Then, the next time the wingman's client communicates with the host, it could pick up that flag and use it as part of the client's logic for determining high-priority tasks. So the client would always work on "ready" tasks first. The trick would be to make sure those tasks don't interfere with truly high-priority tasks based on deadline. Has some merit, but unfortunately wouldn't have helped This one or any other slow hosts that only have one WU and dont contact the servers unil it is done. | |
| ID: 885553 · | |
|
Yes, it would mostly be effective on hosts with a large cache. | |
| ID: 885557 · | |
Get Seti management to send MB's to CUDA only and then for cpu it is AP or nothing. Oh no !!! ... The thought of slaughtering all those poor little VLARs is making me ill. | |
| ID: 885563 · | |
|
20535 pending, 1413 rac | |
| ID: 885580 · | |
20535 pending, 1413 rac I think what is currently happening to your pending is that you worked other projects and came back to seti. You processed a bunch of work right away while most people have to work through their cache to get to the work you've already done. I'd bet your pending goes down to about 4-5X:1 once you've been crunching seti regularly for a month or so ____________ Proud member of TSWB. End terrorism by building a school | |
| ID: 885585 · | |
20535 pending, 1413 rac When my RAC was ~5,000 a few weeks ago my pendings were ~84,000, 16.8:1. But in the last 10 days I have had several good paydays. Two days have been in excess of 12,000 so pendings now only 69,165 and RAC up, so ratio much lower now. | |
| ID: 885598 · | |
20535 pending, 1413 rac That, and I have only just begun accepting AP units (optimized of course) so I bet that is a part of it. ____________ | |
| ID: 885604 · | |
|
My Pending to RAC credit for my fastest machine is currently at about 102.000 to 8.300 or about 12.3 to 1. | |
| ID: 885628 · | |
|
Pending credit: 2,092,690.77 | |
| ID: 885633 · | |
|
My pending is up around 42000 currently, it was over 52000 last week before I shut down AP for a little bit. | |
| ID: 885656 · | |
|
15.75 : 1 | |
| ID: 885680 · | |
|
| |
| ID: 885684 · | |
@ Rob Neff Kenzie, it shouldn't be embarrassing really. If you had a bunch of machines at your disposal, and a willingness to babysit them everyday (and babysitting *IS* required), you'd be right up there too. Everyone here does what they can and that should be good enough for anyone. I just happen to be in a good position at the moment to do a lot of SETI work. :) Funny to think though, that if I stopped crunching all together that my credit total would still go up by 2 million over time. Rob ____________ | |
| ID: 885718 · | |
|
LOL.. | |
| ID: 885737 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : pending credits
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |