Version 6.08 in Main

Message boards : Number crunching : Version 6.08 in Main

1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Author	Message
Hans Kramer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 61 Credit: 8,770,184 RAC: 0	Message 855905 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 5:02:40 UTC Last modified: 21 Jan 2009, 5:27:01 UTC
	Just noticed Boinc trying to download version 6.08 from the server. I've got this error 21-1-2009 5:57:48\|SETI@home\|21-1-2009 5:57:48\|SETI@home\|Finished download of setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21-1-2009 5:57:48\|SETI@home\|[error] Signature verification failed for setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21-1-2009 5:57:48\|SETI@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe I'm running stock everything so does anyone have any ideas?? Edit: This results in failed downloads of new WU's! ____________
	ID: 855905 ·

[AF>HFR>RR] ThierryH Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 28 Oct 01 Posts: 35 Credit: 10,864,122 RAC: 0	Message 855919 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 7:13:17 UTC - in response to Message 855905.
	Same thing for me. Thierry ____________
	ID: 855919 ·

Jonathan Send message Joined: 1 Oct 07 Posts: 5 Credit: 175,559 RAC: 1,434	Message 855920 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 7:16:59 UTC
	Snap, I am unable to download new work units. 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Starting BOINC client version 6.4.5 for windows_intelx86 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Data directory: E:\Utilities\Web\Bionic\xxdata 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Running under account Jonathan 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 2] 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Home x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Memory: 1.99 GB physical, 3.84 GB virtual 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Disk: 72.72 GB total, 52.89 GB free 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Local time is UTC +0 hours 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Not using a proxy 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|CUDA devices found 21/01/2009 07:06:18\|\|Coprocessor: GeForce 9600 GT (1) 21/01/2009 07:15:04\|SETI@home\|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 5522 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks 21/01/2009 07:15:09\|SETI@home\|Scheduler request completed: got 1 new tasks 21/01/2009 07:15:11\|SETI@home\|Started download of setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:15:11\|SETI@home\|Started download of 10dc08aa.27153.19295.11.8.25 21/01/2009 07:15:14\|SETI@home\|Finished download of 10dc08aa.27153.19295.11.8.25 21/01/2009 07:15:17\|SETI@home\|Finished download of setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:15:17\|SETI@home\|[error] Signature verification failed for setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:15:17\|SETI@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe
	ID: 855920 ·

Riker Send message Joined: 10 May 01 Posts: 2 Credit: 7,696,387 RAC: 33	Message 855923 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 7:24:17 UTC - in response to Message 855920.
	You're not alone, i have the same problem..... Probably a bad file or the main .exe has been damaged.... Hope they fix it quick. /Will ____________
	ID: 855923 ·

Byron S Goodgame Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Jan 06 Posts: 1151 Credit: 3,936,993 RAC: 0	Message 855925 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 7:34:06 UTC
	You could always try a driect download from http://boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah/download_fanout/setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe and place it in the seti folder. ____________
	ID: 855925 ·

Hans Kramer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 61 Credit: 8,770,184 RAC: 0	Message 855932 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 8:03:37 UTC - in response to Message 855925.
	If that's the file that fails the verification in the first place, I'm not so sure I want to do that. I'll wait for the admins to check and correct. Another thing, firing up my "slower" laptop, it started to process Cuda WU's again. It's not using the 6.08 though, but 6.06. Speculating I would say: 1. The slower machines that weren't allowed Cuda WU's for the last few days, are now allowed new 6.06 WU's. 2. The faster machines that in the last days kept on using Cuda now try to use 6.08. I don't get it, the slower machines were cut of of 6.06 WU's in the first place 'cause 6.06 was causing errors on those machines. Why allowing it now? ____________
	ID: 855932 ·

cdb Send message Joined: 11 Sep 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 39,770 RAC: 0	Message 855934 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 8:07:12 UTC - in response to Message 855905.
	I have this: 21/01/2009 07:58:45\|SETI@home\|Started download of setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:58:45\|SETI@home\|Started download of cudart.dll 21/01/2009 07:58:49\|SETI@home\|Finished download of setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:58:49\|SETI@home\|Finished download of cudart.dll 21/01/2009 07:58:49\|SETI@home\|[error] Signature verification failed for setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:58:49\|SETI@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe 21/01/2009 07:58:49\|SETI@home\|[error] Signature verification failed for cudart.dll 21/01/2009 07:58:49\|SETI@home\|[error] Checksum or signature error for cudart.dll I tried resetting the seti project - didn't help. I tried detaching from seti, stopping and restarting bionc, reattaching to seti - idn't help. I downloaded setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe directly using firefox and compared (fc /b) it agains the copy bionc had downloaded and they are the same. I'm not that sure what to do next!
	ID: 855934 ·

GM3EIY Send message Joined: 1 Nov 08 Posts: 3 Credit: 1,538,756 RAC: 0	Message 855937 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 8:32:12 UTC
	Same with me, but had to go to work so cant fix yet. only on one machine at the moment, all rest using 6.03 but not 6.06 Mike GM3EIY
	ID: 855937 ·

ChrisLX200 Send message Joined: 30 Dec 08 Posts: 4 Credit: 109,431 RAC: 0	Message 855938 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 8:58:04 UTC Last modified: 21 Jan 2009, 9:04:48 UTC
	Same here, countless automatic download attempts of 6.08 all failed, WUs for 6.08 fail to download, no new 6.06 WUs downloaded. Not good. Looks like I'm not going to be offered any more 6.06 units so no harm trying the manual download, CUDA will be idle otherwise. Edit - well the 6.08 exe is already there is the directory, so that didn't help...
	ID: 855938 ·

Raistmer Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 2626 Credit: 26,637,339 RAC: 35,649	Message 855940 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 9:21:39 UTC - in response to Message 855938.
	Try to use app_info.xml file. It should stop CRC checking and will allow to use downloaded 6.08
	ID: 855940 ·

perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3359 Credit: 9,973,081 RAC: 12,895	Message 855974 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:21:16 UTC Last modified: 21 Jan 2009, 14:37:03 UTC
	Dang, I miss out on all the fun. Mine hasn't even tried to download the new 608s and is happily crunching along on the 607s. Could it be because I'm running Raistmer's V6? Yep, just checked my app_info No 608 mentioned. Guess I'll keep crunching 607s till they get the 608 fixed. ____________ PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC
	ID: 855974 ·

ChrisLX200 Send message Joined: 30 Dec 08 Posts: 4 Credit: 109,431 RAC: 0	Message 855977 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:33:32 UTC
	It's still downloading the bad copy of 6.08 and still broke. Did anyone actually test this release? Is it going to be fixed any time soon, or do we have to figure it out ourselves? Is there life on Mars?...
	ID: 855977 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7670 Credit: 40,275,322 RAC: 21,550	Message 855978 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:37:05 UTC - in response to Message 855974.
	Dang, I miss out on all the fun. Mine hasn't even tried to download the new 608s and is happily crunching along on the 607s. Could it be because I'm running Raistmer's V6? Yes. If you're using Raistmer's app, then by definition you're using an app_info.xml file - and that means you have to do your updating manually. You won't get v6.08 automatically - which seems like a good thing, given the reports here. Since you've got an app_info already, you could download setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe (1,412 KB) manually, and edit your existing file to replace all references to Raistmer's file with references to setiathome_6.08_windows_intelx86__cuda.exe.
	ID: 855978 ·

Rick A. Sponholz Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 41 Credit: 12,451,980 RAC: 12,968	Message 855979 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:37:08 UTC
	I'm running BOINC 6.6.0 and having the same check sum issue with 6.08 EXE, along with countless failed Seti CUDA 6.08 work units on all five of my cuda eligible machines. GPUGRID (just attached to this project yesterday) and Seti CUDA 6.06 are proccessing correctly though, as far as I can tell. ____________
	ID: 855979 ·

john deneer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Nov 06 Posts: 331 Credit: 20,995,435 RAC: 0	Message 855980 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:37:41 UTC - in response to Message 855977.
	It's still downloading the bad copy of 6.08 and still broke. Did anyone actually test this release? Is it going to be fixed any time soon, or do we have to figure it out ourselves? Is there life on Mars?... There may be life on Mars, but there probably is little life in the labs in Berkeley right now :-) Time difference between UTC and Berkeley is, if I remember correctly, 8 hours. So it's now approx 6:36 AM in Berkeley (15:36 in the Netherlands, UTC+1). So it will probably be at least a couple of hours before someone over there notices that something is wrong ... Regards, John.
	ID: 855980 ·

Rick A. Sponholz Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 41 Credit: 12,451,980 RAC: 12,968	Message 855983 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 14:47:58 UTC - in response to Message 855980.
	Is there anyplace else we should post this problem? ____________
	ID: 855983 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7670 Credit: 40,275,322 RAC: 21,550	Message 855988 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 15:07:06 UTC
	I've posted in Technical News and the Staff Blog, linking back to this thread. Not much else we can do, really, since there's no official place for posting bug reports except here. Unless a passing Mod has a back-channel they could press into service?
	ID: 855988 ·

perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3359 Credit: 9,973,081 RAC: 12,895	Message 855998 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 15:30:13 UTC - in response to Message 855988.
	As was said earlier, right now it is only 7:30 in Berkeley right now. They should be coming in to work shortly. I'm sure they will hear about it as soon as they get in. Another great start to a beautiful day. :) ____________ PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC
	ID: 855998 ·

Jonathan Send message Joined: 1 Oct 07 Posts: 5 Credit: 175,559 RAC: 1,434	Message 856011 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 16:38:29 UTC - in response to Message 855998.
	You mean that they don't have a 24hr help line for Insomniacs? ____________
	ID: 856011 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7670 Credit: 40,275,322 RAC: 21,550	Message 856013 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 16:42:51 UTC - in response to Message 856011.
	You mean that they don't have a 24hr help line for Insomniacs? Yes they do - we're it!
	ID: 856013 ·

1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Version 6.08 in Main