Question about AMD 64

Message boards : Number crunching : Question about AMD 64

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile basher99

Send message
Joined: 26 Feb 04
Posts: 5
Credit: 4,870,561
RAC: 0
United States
Message 32522 - Posted: 4 Oct 2004, 4:20:06 UTC

I have recently built 2 amd64 boxes and i was wondering how well they would preform on boinc.

ID: 32522 · Report as offensive
sniperbait

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 04
Posts: 67
Credit: 56,828
RAC: 0
United States
Message 32540 - Posted: 4 Oct 2004, 5:31:37 UTC

I have a 64 3200+ (socket 754) For seti it now does a WU in about 4 hrs was 2 hrs and lhc anywhere from 20 min to 1 hr depending on the WU. Also I havent had the problems that other people have had with boinc like lhc taking over seti, ect. BTW I'm also running the windows XP64 bit beta version 1218
[url=http://usa.duane-n-lisa.net]

ID: 32540 · Report as offensive
ChAyOs00

Send message
Joined: 30 Aug 99
Posts: 8
Credit: 4,314,756
RAC: 4
United States
Message 32607 - Posted: 4 Oct 2004, 13:50:49 UTC

On my AMD64 3200+ with it running at stock FSB speed of 200MHz I would get about 2.5hrs per wu. But when I bumped up the FSB speed to about 220-225Mhz I was getting between 1hr 48min to 2hrs. Thats with Windows Xp Pro

ID: 32607 · Report as offensive
Profile slavko.sk
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 Jun 00
Posts: 346
Credit: 417,028
RAC: 0
Slovakia
Message 32609 - Posted: 4 Oct 2004, 13:56:52 UTC

On my AMD64 3200+ socket 754, RAM CL2.5:
FSB 200MHz = 2h35min per WU
FSB 210MHz = 2h20min per WU
I did not try more FSB, this week I go to upgrade processor fun to Zalman CNPS7000B-Cu, finish case cooling issue (silent funs into case) and move FSB higher.
At 95% I'm running WinXP Prof. and 5% WinXP 64bits, no problems with BOINC since 22nd June 2004 (now running SETI 90%, LHC 5% and CPDN 5%).

ID: 32609 · Report as offensive
Ron James

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 00
Posts: 10
Credit: 402,297
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 32989 - Posted: 5 Oct 2004, 18:39:22 UTC - in response to Message 32522.

I've found that although the work units are completed faster on an A64 than on an identical speed athlonxp, the benchmarks report the A64 as being far slower and less credit is earned. This will hopefully be resolved sometime. Wonder if Intel is a sponser :p j/k

> I have recently built 2 amd64 boxes and i was wondering how well they would
> preform on boinc.
>

ID: 32989 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Question about AMD 64


 
©2016 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.