BLACKHOLES,NEUTRONSTARS GRAVITYELECTROMAG MODEL

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : BLACKHOLES,NEUTRONSTARS GRAVITYELECTROMAG MODEL
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile kasule francis
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 08
Posts: 293
Credit: 104,493
RAC: 0
Uganda
Message 856740 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 8:50:21 UTC

GALAXY CLOCK PREDICTION ON BLACK HOLES and FASTER THAN LIGHT TRAVEL.

In my film, "Evidence, The Case For NASA UFOs," a new physics model was introduced for the first time publically, that may prove how faster than light travel can be attained, but it also predicted something new about Black Holes. Today we may have proof that the new theory is accurate.

If people see my "Galaxy Clock" physics model (a 3-d model for viewing EM waves), I show how as waves traveling at the constant speed of light start to tunnel into smaller and smaller orbits, their frequency (revolutions around the Galaxy Clock) increases. While the speed of light is never changed in the wave, the frequency of the wave increases as the waves tunnel into smaller and smaller orbits. This is how I calculate frequnecy in my 3-d wave model.

I predict that as mass (in the wave particle relationship)comes into contact with higher frequnecy waves, mass absorbes these higher frequnecy waves and thus reduces. The closer the wave particle relationship moves to the center of the Galaxy Clock, the higher the frequency.

The experiment of the John Hutchison effect with the levitating 75lb canon ball reveals what happens to mass as it comes in contact with higher frequency waves: mass when it goes into a higher frequency and defies gravity. This may also tell us more about gravity. Perhaps it is in a low frequency wave.

When I applied the Galaxy Clock model to the Galaxy itself and Black Holes, I got an answer opposite to what Einsten saw. I found that as mass (planets and stars) came into contact with higher frequency waves as it moves closer to the core of a black hole, mass (planets and stars) should be getting lighter on the atomic scale. As planets and stars and gases and dust get closer to the black hole, they should start to move faster than ordinary mass (Einstein). Of course the galaxy Clock predicts a succession of EM waves that get higher as the orbits get smaller, hence the x-rays and gammas near a black hole. Also note that when stars supernova, the higher frequency colors of light are found nearer to the center and lower frequencies of light are found in the outer ring or periphery, just as the Galaxy Clock model shows. I found that the wave particle relationship at the Black Hole was of such a high frequnecy order, that all of the planets and stars past the event horrizon were in a near or zero-mass (high frequnecy) state.

When I compared this to the quantum model, for example, in particle accelerator collisions, when a free electron (knocked out of its orbit with a proton) spirals in smaller and smaller orbits, it releases photons, thus showng the transition between mass and light (photons) all following the same physics as my Galaxy Clock model. If the electron gives off its energy, its mass should be reducing with Einstein's law. So mass should be reducing in the electron. I predict it should eventually reach zero if it keeps spiraling and does not join a proton.

If we apply the same physics to Raymond Chiao breaking light speed, we get an answer. He got photons to "tunnel" through quartz glass (in smaller orbits than they normally travel in), thus they went into a higher frequnecy state. My Galaxy Clock will tell me that as they tunnel in smaller orbits, their frequency will rise, their Planck Energy will rise, and their mass reduces even more. This may explain how and why they broke light speed.

The new news on Black Holes possibly ejecting mass faster than light speed seems so easy to answer in regards to all of the Galaxy Clock's physics. It predicts that if mass is reducing as planets and stars move towards the galactic center, and at the black hole it all reaches zero, then mass could eject out of the black hole at light speed and faster.

Particle physicists use energies over one trillion electron volts (1 Tera eletron volt - 1TeV), 5,000 times the energy released in a nuclear explosion using plutonium (200 Million electron volts - 200 MeV) to get a single proton to travel at 99.99% the speed of light. This proves that mass cannot attain or break the speed of light - Einstein.

Only zero mass particles can reach the speed of light and beyond.

My film, "Evidence, The Case for NASA UFOs" reveals the physics of UFOs and how they attain a zero mass state by transforming the low frequency wave particle relationship of matter into a high frequency wave particle relationship of light. Thus they attain zero mass (the quality of light - a photon) by raising the frequnecy of their spacecraft to that of light.

http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/10/03/black.holes/index.html

David Sereda


We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy
ID: 856740 · Report as offensive
Profile kasule francis
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 08
Posts: 293
Credit: 104,493
RAC: 0
Uganda
Message 856742 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 9:14:01 UTC

GALAXY CLOCK THEORY

In 1989, I had along conversation about nuclear fusion powered spacecraft with NASA Head of Propulsion, Power & Energy, Dr. Earl VanLandingham. He then went on to become NASA’s head of Space Access and Technology under Dan Goldin. At the end of the conversation, I asked Dr. VanLandingham if NASA has ever made contact with an extraterrestrial civilization. He said “No, when you consider the amount of energy it would take for a spacecraft to attain near to the speed of light and to travel to Earth from one of our nearest star systems (Alpha Centauri 4.3 light years) in a reasonable amount of time, the energy signal emanating from the craft would be so massive, we would detect the signal well in advance of the arrival of the spacecraft. And we haven’t seen anything (a signal) like that yet.”

Einstein’s postulate that the speed of light cannot be attained or broken by mass or spacecraft is that as a spacecraft tries to accelerate, it encounters resistance in the form of inertia. That inertia increases the mass of the spacecraft the faster it tries to go, so we have to increase the amount of energy in the form of propulsion to try and overcome the inertia. Mass can never attain the speed of light.This is because it takes an infinite amount of energy in the form of propulsion to increase any mass object or spacecraft to the speed of light because as it accelerates, its mass keeps on increasing. As it mass increases, the amount of energy needed to go faster increases as well; thus mass or spacecraft can never attain light speed.

Particle physicists accelerate subatomic particles like muons and protons in particle accelerators (FERMI LAB in Illinois) with energies over 1 trillion electron volts (1TeV – 1 Terra electron Volts) to allow these particles to attain 99.99% the speed of light. How much energy is 1 Terra Electron Volt? A nuclear explosion using plutonium releases a total energy intensity of 200 Million electron Volts (200 MeV). 1 Trillion electron Volts is 5,000 times the energy intensity released in a nuclear explosion.

If a spacecraft were to be doing 99% the speed of light, it would have a massive energy signal at least 5,000 times stronger than the energy released in a nuclear explosion (1TeV). A massive 1 TeV signal would get picked up on every radio telescope and possibly radar on the planet. We would all now it was coming. And we all know we have not seen an energy signal like that yet. There are also other serious problems with a mass spacecraft doing near light speed such as severe g-force on subtle turns, heat and resistance, dodging planets, asteroids and even meteorites. So how are the alleged ET’s propelling their craft at light speed and beyond visiting Earth from other star systems?

In my newly released film and book, “Evidence, The Case for NASA UFOs,” I introduce a new theory in quantum physics that reveals a way to allow spacecraft to attain light speed and beyond without breaking Einstein’s law. Essentially, the initial idea is quite simple, then it gets more complex. The only thing we know that can do light speed is “light” (photons). There had to be a quality, I thought, that photons possessed that could tell us how to get spacecraft to emulate photons and attain the same quality. Photons are supposed to be called mass-less particles. Because they have no mass, and mass cannot attain light speed, an object or spacecraft with no mass could attain light speed also. But how could a spacecraft attain a state of zero mass? Mass is equal to an atom’s mass-charge or mass-energy. Each element on the atomic scale has its own charge or mass equivalent. Plutonium has a much greater mass or charge than hydrogen. Therefore, in Einstein’s equation, plutonium has more energy because it has more mass.

It was in the middle of my 6-year investigation into NASA Space Shuttle UFO phenomena when I realized that all of the NASA UFOs appeared to be made of light. They had attained the kind of state that I knew was the only way to do light speed and beyond. Spacecraft made of light. How did they do it?

Suddenly I realized the quality that light possessed that was distinctly unique over ordinary mass or matter. Physicists have discovered long ago that mass is both a particle and a wave all in the same breadth of observation. Particles are just moments of a wave’s existence. Everything we know is both in a particle/wave relationship. Planets are like giant particles that follow along in waves (gravity orbits) that reveal the motion of the waves they travel in. Electrons spin around protons inside of atoms the same way that planets spin around stars and suns on a particle gravity wave relationship. On a small scale, light (photons/particles) travel in waves also and yet as Einstein revealed photons are both waves and particles at the same time. When subatomic particle physicists peer into component particles of atoms, the particles appear as squiggly waves with no apparent particle appearance at all. This would mean that everything on a subatomic scale is just waves. Waves have frequency.

All waves have frequency, meaning how frequently a wave vibrates per second. We measure light waves in Hertz, named after the physicist Heinreich Hertz. Light waves start as radio waves vibrating in the thousands of times per second, going into the billions of times per second in very high frequency radio. Going even higher we have light vibrating as TV waves, then higher in Microwaves, then Infrared radiation waves, then the visible light spectrum (the colors the human eye and brain can see) the color red (vibrating beyond a quadrillion waves per second), to orange, to yellow, to green, to blue, to purple, to violet, and then into ultraviolet, the spectrum the human brain cannot see. Further, we go to x-ray to gamma rays far beyond the frequency that the human brain and eye can see. In Gammas, waves go far beyond an Octillion waves per second all the way towards a google, a googleplex and to infinity.

Suddenly I realized the difference between mass and photons in the particle-wave relationship was that ordinary mass was in a very low frequency wave state. Planets and stars travel in very long and low frequency waves, so slow per second that they cannot even be measured, perhaps the secret to identifying the mystery of gravity.

Most physicists believe that mass has a zero frequency charge. I believe it has an ultra-low charge, which I may be able to identify with a new wave-particle model I invented called a “Galaxy Clock” (Copyright 2001). The Galaxy Clock measures waves differently than an oscilloscope in that it only looks at waves in the way they actually appear, in spirals or 3-d spinning waves. Oscilloscopes look at the number of peaks in a wave per second, a 2-dimensional model that is not a reality. A Galaxy Clock measures light waves in oscillations, or revolutions around the clock. Smaller oscillating waves orbit the Galaxy Clock faster per second than larger orbiting waves do; thus we determine frequency as it really appears in the wave-particle relationship.

Mass is in an ultra-low frequency wave state. Light is in a very high frequency wave state. Then it dawned on me that what if mass or spacecraft could be converted into light by raising the frequency of a spacecraft or mass to a state equal to light. What would happen then? On a quantum level, photons (light waves) are born when electrons (lowest mass particle) start to oscillate at higher frequencies. This is easily demonstrated in Tesla Coils where we send electric current into a coil at 60 waves per second (Hertz) out of the wall socket, and when it goes through the coil, it oscillates in a much higher frequency, and light in the form of radio waves, TV waves and Microwaves are born.

I was able to determine on a NASA mission number STS-75 (1996 mission) video that many of the UFOs captured on video were pulsing with energy waves. I studied the waves frame by frame. I could see clear wave formations that I could measure on my Galaxy Clock. I found that they were progressively pulsing their craft with a series of Low, medium and ultra-high frequency waves of electromagnetic energy. Thus, I could clearly see a progression of waves from low to high, the very signature I needed to identify to support my theory: that mass could be converted to light by raising its frequency. There were no thruster rocket engines or fire and fuel propelling these UFOs, just these waves.

In theory, I could see what was happening: The ET’s were transforming the low frequency of mass or spacecraft into a higher frequency state of light. In essence, the spacecraft were converting the mass of their spacecraft into light, the very answer I was looking for, and the only way for a spacecraft to attain light speed without proving Einstein wrong. Mass cannot attain light speed but zero-mass can.

In 2001, I came across the work of Canadian Scientist and Engineer, John Hutchison, who was doing work with pulsing steel and other mass objects with a series of low, medium and high frequency radio waves generated by the use of Tesla coils. Astoundingly, a 75 lb steel canon ball started to levitate very easily as it was pulsed by these waves. This was the answer to how so many UFOs could silently hover with no signs of propulsion systems using thrust propulsion and high energy levels. John Hutchison had the answer. I made the connection. The UFOs were doing the same thing. The answer to their propulsion system was staring me in right square the face. We could do the same thing and propel ourselves to the stars at light speed with so little energy.

If giant UFOs were able to convert their heavy mass into light (if the Space shuttle could be made into an energy as light as a photon – zero mass), it would take so little energy in the form of propulsion to get it to go light speed. NASA’s mystery could be answered: why did we have a legitimate UFO phenomenon with no high energy signal, just as Dr. VanLandingham expected in the Einstein mass energy equivalent in regards to attaining 99% the speed of light? Because the UFOs had reduced their mass to zero. With Zero mass, you don’t get an Einsteinian energy signal. You get a different kind of signal.

The answer was that the UFOs were converting their mass into light by using high frequency wave induction. Once their giant spacecraft were converted into light, they weighed in at nothing. The energy required to go light speed would now yield a very low Einsteinian energy signal (because it has no mass charge), yet a very high Max Planck energy signal (E = hf), in that it would be a high frequency wave signal with no mass energy equivalent. The signal would be detected as a high frequency light energy signal with no mass because the whole spacecraft would be made of light. These craft have figured out how to attain light speed and beyond (note that Dr. Raymond Chiao, UC Berkeley physicist got photons to break light speed in 1989).

Once a spacecraft is made of light, it could also appear or disappear into the invisible light spectrum (to the human eye and many cameras). The answer to how the UFO I saw in Berkely, in 1968, disappeared was now crystal clear. It transformed its mass into light and disappeared into an invisible spectra of light. So easy?

But NASA knows all this and they have video cameras aboard the Space Shuttles and aboard satellites that can see into invisible spectra of light, such as the infrared and the near ultraviolet. I confirmed the wavelengths of the shuttles video cameras with NASA scientists back in 1998, Dr. Joseph Nuth, III, Head of Astrochemistry at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, MD. He said that the shuttle’s video cameras could see near UV photons in a letter to me dated April 3, 2000: “Although the camera itself may respond to x-rays and gamma rays (usually as noise), the optics do not serve to focus on anything but visible and near-UV photons. I would be amazed if the optics were not quartz so that the UV cut-off wavelength would be ~ 180 nm. If sapphire the cut-off drops to 160 nm and for CaF2 the cut-off is ~ 135 nm.” UV is divided into near, far and extreme. The near UV is higher in wavelengths frequency than the color violet. It is also invisible to the human eye and spans almost as wide as the visible light spectrum in wavelengths. Many of NASAs video cameras see well into the invisible Infra-red also. Infrared is lower in wavelength frequency than the color red. Infrared is even easier than UV detection.

NASA astronauts were looking where human eyes could not see and that is where the UFOs were showing up. Astronauts didn’t know why they were seeing things that they could not see with their eyes. They may have thought nothing was there. The astronauts don’t know that I have discovered yet.

Now, in regards to UFOs showing up in invisible spectra of light such as the Near UV or infrared (the wavelength capacity of some of the shuttle’s video cameras), the answer as to why no one saw them with their naked eyes was crystal clear. Their craft are transformed into high frequency energy mass (light). They can then attain higher frequencies of light than the human eye can see. These craft or objects must be highly quantized light craft.

NASA now has many cameras and satellites that can peer into the invisible infrared, and ultraviolet near, far and extreme, x-rays and gamma ray wavelengths of light. It is here that our ET encounters can be found hidden from our eyes. It is here that higher dimensions of our universe lie.

Why is NASA looking into higher frequencies of light? Why are so many UFOs visible in these higher frequencies? Because the only way to attain light speed is to transform mass (spacecraft) into light. Now we know where to look and we are finding answers.

As mass objects start to appear in invisible spectra of light, and we find evidence of quantized mass, the answer to where the missing mass of our universe is starts to arise as a distinct possibility. After the Big Bang, the universe started expanding with a mass-energy relationship (Einstein). But at the current rate of expansion, there should be 95% more mass than we can see.

Our universe is a very strange cosmic cocktail," said lead author Max Tegmark, an astrophysicist at the University of Pennsylvania, in a prepared statement. "The 95 percent of the universe that’s not matter like we see around us is matter that can’t be seen at all – matter of a type that still mystifies astronomers and cosmologists."

Could this new theory and analysis of UfOs help to explain the missing mass problem? By photographing invisible mass and invisible UFOs, we start to unveil one of the greatest mysteries of all time: is there a parallel universe? If there is, how can we access it?

In his book “Flying Saucer Conspiracy,” published by Henry Holt and Company of New York, Major Donald Keyhoe (US Navy) recounted what is probably the most significant of all wartime radar detections of UFOs. There were between 200 to 300 objects involved. All of them were invisible to the naked eye. It was called the Nansei-shoto case because of its occurrence near the islands south of Okinawa, Japan.

The story was given to Major Keyhoe by a U.S. Navy officer, pseudonymously identified as James Dawson, who had served as a Combat Information Center Officer aboard an aircraft carrier during the incident. Patrolling the area south of Okinawa in company with another aircraft carrier, Dawson’s ship detected with radar (Microwaves) a huge force of enemy aircraft approaching from the northeast.

Initial radar contact was 120 miles. The blip or echo returning from in incoming force was very large, supporting an estimate of 200-300 aircraft in formation. But it could also be one huge craft, an idea that was impossible to think about in those days for an enemy aircraft. At 100 mile range, their speed was determined to be 650 knotts – nearly 700 mph. No known aircraft I the world at that time could attain such speed. At eighty miles and at an altitude of 12,000 feet, the incoming force of aircraft began to spread out in two formations from the main body, as though preparing to assault the whole American task force. Only twelve available US aircraft were scrambled to intercept. In bright weather, with only scattered clouds at 5,000 feet, the American pilots were in clear skies. At 15,000 feet on interception with the radar signal, they never did see a single incoming craft, ;et alone 200-300 of them. The fighter director on another aircraft carrier also picked up the radar of the alleged enemy craft. But the pilots could not see anything there. According to Major Keyhoe, the U.S. Navy acknowledged after the war that there had been this inexplicable “Ghost of Nansei-shoto.” Thre are countless examples of “Ghost Aircraft” that show up on radar and remain invisible to pilots.

It was Trevor James Constable who wrote the book “The Cosmic Pulse of Life” published in 1976. He was aware of the invisible “Ghost Aircraft” and wanted an answer. He was the first great pioneer of the invisible detection of UFOs. In the 1950s, he and his research team took photographs into alternate spectra of light in the late 1950s and 60s and lone behold, UFOs were showing up on film that were invisible to the naked eye. These UFOs or living entities as he believes many of them are, travel through higher dimensions of the ether.

The most amazing thing about many of the UFOs in Trevor James Constable’s photographs, was that they appear identical to many of the UFOs that show up on the NASA shuttle video cameras. They are disc-shaped, made of light, and have dark or black holes appearing in the center of them. The black hole in the center is the point where wavelengths are too high in frequency for the camera to see; thus a black or void signal appears.

After seeing my film, “Evidence, The Case for NASA UFOs” he wrote me in October, 2002, that “Gentlemen: Greetings. I have reviewed your NASA UFOS video EVIDENCES, which is probably the most important public domain presentation on UFOs to date.” You can find out more about the book and 3-hour video, “Evidence, The Case for NASA UFOs” at: www.UFONASA.com You can also read the full commentary by Trevor James Constable there. You may also order direct by calling toll free at 1-877-UFO-NASA.

David Sereda E-Mail: NASAUFOS@Yahoo.com
HAS NASA MADE CONTACT WITH EXTRATERRESTRIAL INTELLIGENCE?
by David Sereda

We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy
ID: 856742 · Report as offensive
Profile kasule francis
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 08
Posts: 293
Credit: 104,493
RAC: 0
Uganda
Message 858127 - Posted: 26 Jan 2009, 16:55:20 UTC

Supermassive Black Holes Not Guilty Of Shutting Down Star Formation
ScienceDaily (Jan. 25, 2009) — A team of Yale University astronomers has discovered that galaxies stop forming stars long before their central supermassive black holes reach their most powerful stage, meaning the black holes can’t be responsible for shutting down star formation.

Chandra Catches 'Piranha' Black Holes
Supermassive black holes have been discovered to grow more rapidly in young galaxy clusters, according to new results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory. These "fast-track" supermassive black
We choose to go to the moon and to do other things, we choose to go to the moon not because its easy but because its hard. kennedy
ID: 858127 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : BLACKHOLES,NEUTRONSTARS GRAVITYELECTROMAG MODEL


 
©2017 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.