WAS THERE ALREADY SOMETHING FOUND with SETI?

What i´m asking is if after all this millions of hours of processing was there any kind of suspect signal pattern detected ?

If it was, can anybody tell me something about that... I´m curious!

my best regards from Portugal to all of you who contribute to this beautifull project!

Ok...

So I´ll keep the computer processing!

thank you for the answer and let´s see if we find something

!

And what about any particular/relevant astronomical event discovered by seti@home?

Thanks

Im just wandering is there an easy to understand explanation for triplets, guassians, pulses and spikes?

So if we get a strong signal as seti@home mapview tells me then it has to be confirmed a second time?

I guess its like the Wow signal then we are waiting for a second positive detection to confirm its not a miracle occurance?
____________

It there anything that could be done to disable seti@home? Just to remove the seti@home program for a particular time but has the option of starting the program again after that time has passed.

Would the system be able to detect a signal coming from a moving object?

From what i understand SETI counts on an ETI actively searching out other civilizations or or at least broadcasting its own existence. That is until we can listen closely enough to "hear" leakage broadcast or signals not really meant for us.

Point is, if they were actively signally, some sort of probe system would be a good way to get your signal out there in a wide range.Unless youve already mastered some sort of long range communication.

So back to original question. If that was the case and SETI got results for the same signal but at Different parts of sky and Different times would they be able to figure out if it was the same object

Ok, Thanks.

My understanding (and please correct me if I'm wrong), is that there have been anomalies discovered that could point to ETI. However, when doing a followup on the best candidate signals, they didn't meet criteria (i.e. didn't repeat, in the wrong band, verified as natural or terrestrial phenomenon, etc).

The important thing to note is that the standards by which an artificial signal would be declared are very high, as they should be. Having said that, it wouldn't be scientific to assume that we have found something. But it's possible that we found something that was ambiguous and didn't repeat that COULD have been of ET origin but lacked sufficient criteria to be declared of ET origin.

You can look here for more detailed information that addresses your question;
http://www.planetary.org/news/2004/0902_SETIhome_Leaders_Deny_Reports_of.html

But officially, nothing.

It's a very very big haystack, and we're looking for a very very tiny needle.