Semiautofs (Oct 09 2008)

Message boards : Technical News : Semiautofs (Oct 09 2008)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Matt Lebofsky
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 1444
Credit: 957,058
RAC: 0
United States
Message 816375 - Posted: 9 Oct 2008, 20:26:27 UTC

Let's see.. We had one of our download servers choked on NFS again, which caused its httpd server to die. I gave both autofs and httpd a swift kick on that machine (vader) and it's back up server workunits again. Of course that means there's a backlog of clients trying to connect to it, and we'll be dropping various other connections while that queue clears out.

Our mysql research led us to discover we needn't upgrade our current mysql version after all to make use of automatic index merges. We haven't been seeing this logic being employed due to (a) low ordinality of certain indexes and (b) mysql refusing to use multi-dimensional indexes in their merges. Fair enough. We'll just have to change around our current constraints.sql (dropping some 2-dimensional indexes and making new single dimensional ones) and see what sticks.

Other than that.. today I've been working on LVM/xfs snapshots and making slow but steady progress on radar blanking testing.

- Matt

-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person
-- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude
ID: 816375 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 816408 - Posted: 9 Oct 2008, 21:20:51 UTC - in response to Message 816375.  

Let's see.. We had one of our download servers choked on NFS again, which caused its httpd server to die. I gave both autofs and httpd a swift kick on that machine (vader) and it's back up server workunits again. Of course that means there's a backlog of clients trying to connect to it, and we'll be dropping various other connections while that queue clears out.

Our mysql research led us to discover we needn't upgrade our current mysql version after all to make use of automatic index merges. We haven't been seeing this logic being employed due to (a) low ordinality of certain indexes and (b) mysql refusing to use multi-dimensional indexes in their merges. Fair enough. We'll just have to change around our current constraints.sql (dropping some 2-dimensional indexes and making new single dimensional ones) and see what sticks.

Other than that.. today I've been working on LVM/xfs snapshots and making slow but steady progress on radar blanking testing.

- Matt


Thanks for the update.

ID: 816408 · Report as offensive
Profile Dr. C.E.T.I.
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 00
Posts: 16019
Credit: 794,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 816418 - Posted: 9 Oct 2008, 21:43:40 UTC


. . . Thanks again for the Updates Matt

- Berkeley - You deserve accolades . . .


BOINC Wiki . . .

Science Status Page . . .
ID: 816418 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1066
Credit: 1,226,053
RAC: 2
United States
Message 816535 - Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 3:23:43 UTC - in response to Message 816375.  

Other than that.. today I've been working on LVM/xfs snapshots and making slow but steady progress on radar blanking testing.


XFS?!? I can't believe I hear you saying that. Who are you and what did you do with Matt? :)
ID: 816535 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30639
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 816539 - Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 3:45:27 UTC - in response to Message 816535.  

Other than that.. today I've been working on LVM/xfs snapshots and making slow but steady progress on radar blanking testing.


XFS?!? I can't believe I hear you saying that. Who are you and what did you do with Matt? :)


You are thinking of CEN/xfs. LVM/xfs is what I'd expect to find Matt working on.


ID: 816539 · Report as offensive
H Elzinga
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 99
Posts: 125
Credit: 8,277,116
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 816593 - Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 8:24:41 UTC - in response to Message 816535.  
Last modified: 10 Oct 2008, 8:25:49 UTC

Other than that.. today I've been working on LVM/xfs snapshots and making slow but steady progress on radar blanking testing.


XFS?!? I can't believe I hear you saying that. Who are you and what did you do with Matt? :)


As far as i know XSF is a file system used by silicon graphics machines.
It has been the base file system in their IRIX OS for many years and i beleive was later adopted into a few Linux like distributions.

It actualy is a 64 bit file system alowing the system to adress huge volumes and files.


LVM is not actualy a file system but a way to organize the disks in a system (like configuring a RAID array) to be used.
ID: 816593 · Report as offensive
DJStarfox

Send message
Joined: 23 May 01
Posts: 1066
Credit: 1,226,053
RAC: 2
United States
Message 816676 - Posted: 10 Oct 2008, 15:10:57 UTC - in response to Message 816539.  

Other than that.. today I've been working on LVM/xfs snapshots and making slow but steady progress on radar blanking testing.


XFS?!? I can't believe I hear you saying that. Who are you and what did you do with Matt? :)


You are thinking of CEN/xfs. LVM/xfs is what I'd expect to find Matt working on.


No, no. I believe Matt is the guy that swore he'd not use anything but ext3 on the servers. That's why I find it a surprise to see him using XFS.
ID: 816676 · Report as offensive
John G

Send message
Joined: 29 Dec 01
Posts: 68
Credit: 10,932,850
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 817285 - Posted: 11 Oct 2008, 23:35:19 UTC - in response to Message 816375.  

hmmmm can someone go over to caltech and kick the upload server :)
ID: 817285 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 817363 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 2:25:43 UTC - in response to Message 817285.  

hmmmm can someone go over to caltech and kick the upload server :)

No, they can't. The upload server is roughly 350 miles from Caltech.
ID: 817363 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1643
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 817373 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 2:56:39 UTC - in response to Message 817363.  
Last modified: 12 Oct 2008, 2:58:35 UTC

hmmmm can someone go over to caltech and kick the upload server :)

No, they can't. The upload server is roughly 350 miles from Caltech.

In that case we may have to wait until late Monday night or early Tuesday morning New Zealand time, until the upload server is working again. It's 15:57 here now on Sunday.
Speedy
ID: 817373 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 817379 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 3:07:30 UTC - in response to Message 817373.  

hmmmm can someone go over to caltech and kick the upload server :)

No, they can't. The upload server is roughly 350 miles from Caltech.

In that case we may have to wait until late Monday night or early Tuesday morning New Zealand time, until the upload server is working again. It's 15:57 here now on Sunday.
Speedy


Nope. Monday is a holiday here in the U.S., so it probably won't be until Tuesday before someone gets in to fix the problem.
ID: 817379 · Report as offensive
BarryAZ

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 01
Posts: 2580
Credit: 16,982,517
RAC: 0
United States
Message 817386 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 3:22:20 UTC - in response to Message 817379.  

Perhaps things won't be fixed until after the standard 4 hour outage on Tuesday, which, with the building backlog would suggest we won't see 'normal' until late Wednesday.

Oh well, that's what having multiple projects is all about.

ID: 817386 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1643
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 817387 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 3:24:47 UTC - in response to Message 817379.  


Nope. Monday is a holiday here in the U.S., so it probably won't be until Tuesday before someone gets in to fix the problem.

OK this means disk may over fill & the project might grind to a halt. I hope this is not the case of cause. Cos Monday is a holiday dose this mean there outage will be on Wednesday, or will they still do it on Tuesday as normal?

ID: 817387 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 817389 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 3:27:55 UTC - in response to Message 817387.  


Nope. Monday is a holiday here in the U.S., so it probably won't be until Tuesday before someone gets in to fix the problem.

OK this means disk may over fill & the project might grind to a halt. I hope this is not the case of cause. Cos Monday is a holiday dose this mean there outage will be on Wednesday, or will they still do it on Tuesday as normal?


I honestly can't answer that. I know that there has been a time or two in the past where they've put off the Tuesday outage until Wednesday for that very reason.
ID: 817389 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 817390 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 3:36:13 UTC - in response to Message 817373.  

hmmmm can someone go over to caltech and kick the upload server :)

No, they can't. The upload server is roughly 350 miles from Caltech.

In that case we may have to wait until late Monday night or early Tuesday morning New Zealand time, until the upload server is working again. It's 15:57 here now on Sunday.
Speedy

Caltech (The California Institute of Technology) is a private university in Pasadena, CA. and is not part of the University of California.
ID: 817390 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1643
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 817399 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 3:58:13 UTC - in response to Message 817390.  
Last modified: 12 Oct 2008, 3:58:32 UTC

Caltech (The California Institute of Technology) is a private university in Pasadena, CA. and is not part of the University of California.

Dose Caltech have Monday off? Why is the uploads server so far away from the Seti lab?
Speedy
ID: 817399 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 817401 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 4:13:21 UTC - in response to Message 817399.  

Caltech (The California Institute of Technology) is a private university in Pasadena, CA. and is not part of the University of California.

Dose Caltech have Monday off? Why is the uploads server so far away from the Seti lab?
Speedy

The SETI@Home lab is at U.C. Berkeley, not Caltech.

Kind of like the difference between Victoria University and Auckland University of Technology.
ID: 817401 · Report as offensive
Speedy
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 04
Posts: 1643
Credit: 12,921,799
RAC: 89
New Zealand
Message 817403 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 4:22:09 UTC - in response to Message 817401.  

/quote]
The SETI@Home lab is at U.C. Berkeley, not Caltech.

Kind of like the difference between Victoria University and Auckland University of Technology.

I understand that the bit I was asking about is why is the upload server so far away from the Seti lab
ID: 817403 · Report as offensive
1mp0£173
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 8423
Credit: 356,897
RAC: 0
United States
Message 817407 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 4:30:55 UTC - in response to Message 817403.  

/quote]
The SETI@Home lab is at U.C. Berkeley, not Caltech.

Kind of like the difference between Victoria University and Auckland University of Technology.

I understand that the bit I was asking about is why is the upload server so far away from the Seti lab

The SETI@Home Lab is 350 miles from Caltech.
ID: 817407 · Report as offensive
Profile KWSN THE Holy Hand Grenade!
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Dec 05
Posts: 3187
Credit: 57,163,290
RAC: 0
United States
Message 817423 - Posted: 12 Oct 2008, 5:11:09 UTC
Last modified: 12 Oct 2008, 5:15:32 UTC

Upload server is co-located with the rest of SETI at UC Berkeley, in the Space Sciences Laborotory, which is about a mile up a very steep hill from the main UCB campus...

CalTech, as has been mentioned upthread, is 350 miles from UCB, and has nothing to do with the project, except moral support!
.

Hello, from Albany, CA!...
ID: 817423 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Technical News : Semiautofs (Oct 09 2008)


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.