6.2.18 Issues.

Message boards : Number crunching : 6.2.18 Issues.
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile Aristoteles Doukas
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Apr 08
Posts: 1091
Credit: 2,140,913
RAC: 0
Finland
Message 809440 - Posted: 18 Sep 2008, 11:10:32 UTC

must be something else, running boinc 6.2.18 & vista without problems
ID: 809440 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24879
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 809470 - Posted: 18 Sep 2008, 13:32:35 UTC - in response to Message 809440.  

must be something else, running boinc 6.2.18 & vista without problems



Like....? Nothing new has been added to system - no hardware or software. No tweaking of any sort done, & it's always between 03:00 - 08:00.
ID: 809470 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24879
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 809571 - Posted: 18 Sep 2008, 22:10:45 UTC

6.2.18 & BAM.

Have set NNT (via BAM) on 2 systems as they will be collected by customers tomorrow afternoon. Customers ok with boinc on their rigs. Reason for NNT is that they won't be on the net until the connections are done early next week.

Just finishing ensuring everything is in order before rigs are packed & noticed that they are both d/l'ing wu's, even though they have been sync'ed with BAM.

Never had this problem with 5.10.45. Is this a 6.2.18 or BAM problem?
ID: 809571 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24879
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 809795 - Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 8:09:30 UTC

Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
- <System>
<Provider Name="Application Error" />
<EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID>
<Level>2</Level>
<Task>100</Task>
<Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2008-09-19T06:28:01.000Z" />
<EventRecordID>4148</EventRecordID>
<Channel>Application</Channel>
<Computer>Dacom-1</Computer>
<Security />
</System>
- <EventData>
<Data>boinc.exe</Data>
<Data>6.2.18.0</Data>
<Data>48a757ff</Data>
<Data>boinc.exe</Data>
<Data>6.2.18.0</Data>
<Data>48a757ff</Data>
<Data>c0000006</Data>
<Data>000499d0</Data>
<Data>9f4</Data>
<Data>01c9197474dc5920</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>

Day 5 & it's done it again. Reboot clears problem. If it still happens by day 7, will switch back to 5.10.45.
ID: 809795 · Report as offensive
Sirius B Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 24879
Credit: 3,081,182
RAC: 7
Ireland
Message 809913 - Posted: 19 Sep 2008, 16:44:37 UTC

Done it again, so 6.2.18 uninstalled. Reverted to 5.10.45. Unfortunately, in doing so, lost 18 wu's, so apologies to wingmen.
ID: 809913 · Report as offensive
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 811419 - Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 0:51:49 UTC
Last modified: 24 Sep 2008, 0:56:07 UTC

I see that BOINC 6.2.19 is out.
Question: worth the bother of upgrading? I only crunch here, Einstein, MW and PrimeGrid. I'm Windows Vista Home Premium (SP1) in AMD 2.4 ghz dual core.
So, should I?

[edit] I've not had any problems with .18 so far :)[/edit]
Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 811419 · Report as offensive
Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 8962
Credit: 12,678,685
RAC: 0
United States
Message 811421 - Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 1:05:04 UTC - in response to Message 811419.  

I see that BOINC 6.2.19 is out.
Question: worth the bother of upgrading? I only crunch here, Einstein, MW and PrimeGrid. I'm Windows Vista Home Premium (SP1) in AMD 2.4 ghz dual core.
So, should I?

[edit] I've not had any problems with .18 so far :)[/edit]


I'm perfectly content with 5.10.45 but I hear projects like Pirates are forcing use of newer Boinc versions


ID: 811421 · Report as offensive
Profile Allie in Vancouver
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 3949
Credit: 1,604,668
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 811428 - Posted: 24 Sep 2008, 1:42:11 UTC - in response to Message 811421.  

I see that BOINC 6.2.19 is out.
Question: worth the bother of upgrading? I only crunch here, Einstein, MW and PrimeGrid. I'm Windows Vista Home Premium (SP1) in AMD 2.4 ghz dual core.
So, should I?

[edit] I've not had any problems with .18 so far :)[/edit]


I'm perfectly content with 5.10.45 but I hear projects like Pirates are forcing use of newer Boinc versions

I also crunch at PrimeGrid (and other BOINC projects) some of which have had 6.XX/XX problems so I was just looking for a broad view as to if I should update in regards to the overall BOINC world.
I have asked at PrimeGrid but not yet at Einstein or MW. I haven't had any issues at any of my projects with .18, but was just wondering.
:)
Pure mathematics is, in its way, the poetry of logical ideas.

Albert Einstein
ID: 811428 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 811828 - Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 8:51:22 UTC - in response to Message 811428.  
Last modified: 25 Sep 2008, 8:59:57 UTC

I see that BOINC 6.2.19 is out.
Question: worth the bother of upgrading? I only crunch here, Einstein, MW and PrimeGrid. I'm Windows Vista Home Premium (SP1) in AMD 2.4 ghz dual core.
So, should I?

[edit] I've not had any problems with .18 so far :)[/edit]


I'm perfectly content with 5.10.45 but I hear projects like Pirates are forcing use of newer Boinc versions

I also crunch at PrimeGrid (and other BOINC projects) some of which have had 6.XX/XX problems so I was just looking for a broad view as to if I should update in regards to the overall BOINC world.
I have asked at PrimeGrid but not yet at Einstein or MW. I haven't had any issues at any of my projects with .18, but was just wondering.
:)


I've tried BOINC 6.2.18/16/14 on 3 PC's now, 2 C2Q, one running VISTA(32) and one on XP64, also on a Pentium Dual-Core (P4D;Smithfield), runs XP32 Home.
On all 3 host's noticed the same kind off error's (GetSharedMem), also random reBOOT's, without any traceble cause yet.
Also problems with graphic card's. And some kind off interaction with 32BIT EINSTEIN, wich also produces error's. I've tested the 32BIT handling (SiSoftSandra) and found nothing, all test and benchmarks went smooth and OK.
Only thing left, going back to 5.10.45, on wich I never seen such strange error's.(And still use Crunch3r's 6.1.0 on one host.)
If my healt wasn't in such a bad condition*, I would have tried to figure out, or debug version 6.2.xx.
Do need surgery and am now on heavy (nico-morfin)painkillers :(
ID: 811828 · Report as offensive
Profile computerguy09
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Aug 99
Posts: 80
Credit: 9,570,364
RAC: 3
United States
Message 811875 - Posted: 25 Sep 2008, 14:59:37 UTC - in response to Message 811828.  

I see that BOINC 6.2.19 is out.
Question: worth the bother of upgrading? I only crunch here, Einstein, MW and PrimeGrid. I'm Windows Vista Home Premium (SP1) in AMD 2.4 ghz dual core.
So, should I?

[edit] I've not had any problems with .18 so far :)[/edit]


I'm perfectly content with 5.10.45 but I hear projects like Pirates are forcing use of newer Boinc versions

I also crunch at PrimeGrid (and other BOINC projects) some of which have had 6.XX/XX problems so I was just looking for a broad view as to if I should update in regards to the overall BOINC world.
I have asked at PrimeGrid but not yet at Einstein or MW. I haven't had any issues at any of my projects with .18, but was just wondering.
:)


I've tried BOINC 6.2.18/16/14 on 3 PC's now, 2 C2Q, one running VISTA(32) and one on XP64, also on a Pentium Dual-Core (P4D;Smithfield), runs XP32 Home.
On all 3 host's noticed the same kind off error's (GetSharedMem), also random reBOOT's, without any traceble cause yet.
Also problems with graphic card's. And some kind off interaction with 32BIT EINSTEIN, wich also produces error's. I've tested the 32BIT handling (SiSoftSandra) and found nothing, all test and benchmarks went smooth and OK.
Only thing left, going back to 5.10.45, on wich I never seen such strange error's.(And still use Crunch3r's 6.1.0 on one host.)
If my healt wasn't in such a bad condition*, I would have tried to figure out, or debug version 6.2.xx.
Do need surgery and am now on heavy (nico-morfin)painkillers :(


Fred,
Not sure what's wrong with your setups, but I've been running 6.2.18 on 3 or 4 rigs (WinXP and Vista) for awhile without any problems. I've slowly been converting my 5.10.45 rigs to the 6.2.18/19 version.

I will leave at least one at 5.10.45 (it's an old P3) that runs LHC and a few other projects because of LHC's problems right now with 6.x.

I did try to run my quad 6600 on 6.3.10 for a little while, for GPUGRID, but due to problems with BOINCview and the graphics drivers, I moved back to 6.2.18.


Mark

ID: 811875 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : 6.2.18 Issues.


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.