About a hundred off calculatin error's on the X64 host

Message boards : Number crunching : About a hundred off calculatin error's on the X64 host
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 790496 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 17:51:10 UTC

When I looked this afternoon at my X9650, running XP64
saw, about hundred WU's ended in calculating error's!
Nothing on the x86 host's.
It runs the latest BOINC 6.2.14, with AK_V8_SSE4.1 opti app.
Absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Anybody noticing similar problems?

ID: 790496 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 790510 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 18:32:28 UTC - in response to Message 790496.  

When I looked this afternoon at my X9650, running XP64
saw, about hundred WU's ended in calculating error's!
Nothing on the x86 host's.
It runs the latest BOINC 6.2.14, with AK_V8_SSE4.1 opti app.
Absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Anybody noticing similar problems?

If you're getting calc errors and wingmen are not, then try winding back the overclock. If wingmen are getting them too, then don't worry about it, it's wonky WU's.

F.
ID: 790510 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 790513 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 18:36:09 UTC - in response to Message 790510.  
Last modified: 31 Jul 2008, 18:46:41 UTC

When I looked this afternoon at my X9650, running XP64
saw, about hundred WU's ended in calculating error's!
Nothing on the x86 host's.
It runs the latest BOINC 6.2.14, with AK_V8_SSE4.1 opti app.
Absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Anybody noticing similar problems?

If you're getting calc errors and wingmen are not, then try winding back the overclock. If wingmen are getting them too, then don't worry about it, it's wonky WU's.

F.


Here a piece off the BOINC logfile,

31-7-2008 16:08:54|SETI@home|Starting task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 528
31-7-2008 16:08:56|SETI@home|Started upload of 02mr08ae.15167.10297.6.8.49_2_0
31-7-2008 16:09:00|SETI@home|Finished upload of 02mr08ae.15167.10297.6.8.49_2_0
31-7-2008 16:37:29|SETI@home|Computation for task 19jn08ad.27214.141896.3.8.129_2 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:29|SETI@home|Starting 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0
31-7-2008 16:37:30|SETI@home|Starting 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Computation for task 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Output file 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0_0 for task 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0 absent
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Computation for task 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Output file 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1_0 for task 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1 absent
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Starting 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.128_0
31-7-2008 16:37:32|SETI@home|Started upload of 19jn08ad.27214.141896.3.8.129_2_0
31-7-2008 16:44:25|SETI@home|Computation for task 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:44:25|SETI@home|Output file 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0_0 for task 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0 absent
31-7-2008 16:58:42|SETI@home|Computation for task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:58:44|SETI@home|Started upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0_0
31-7-2008 16:58:50|SETI@home|Finished upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0_0
31-7-2008 17:02:06|SETI@home|Computation for task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0 finished
31-7-2008 17:02:08|SETI@home|Started upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0_0
31-7-2008 17:02:12|SETI@home|Finished upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0_0

Never seen this message before !?
ID: 790513 · Report as offensive
Profile Sutaru Tsureku
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 790514 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 18:37:49 UTC - in response to Message 790496.  

When I looked this afternoon at my X9650, running XP64
saw, about hundred WU's ended in calculating error's!
Nothing on the x86 host's.
It runs the latest BOINC 6.2.14, with AK_V8_SSE4.1 opti app.
Absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Anybody noticing similar problems?


I found only one Client error - Compute error at your X9650:

<core_client_version>6.2.14</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
 - exit code -6 (0xfffffffa)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
Unrecognized XML in parse_init_data_file: computation_deadline
Skipping: 1219529220.136000
Skipping: /computation_deadline
Unrecognized XML in parse_init_data_file: computation_deadline
Skipping: 1219529220.136000
Skipping: /computation_deadline
[b]SETI@home error -6 Bad workunit header[/b]
!swi.data_type || !found || !swi.nsamples
File: ..\seti_header.cpp
Line: 210


</stderr_txt>
]]>


No problem at your side.. Bad WU.. ;-)

ID: 790514 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 790515 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 18:38:34 UTC - in response to Message 790513.  

When I looked this afternoon at my X9650, running XP64
saw, about hundred WU's ended in calculating error's!
Nothing on the x86 host's.
It runs the latest BOINC 6.2.14, with AK_V8_SSE4.1 opti app.
Absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Anybody noticing similar problems?

If you're getting calc errors and wingmen are not, then try winding back the overclock. If wingmen are getting them too, then don't worry about it, it's wonky WU's.

F.


Here a piece off the BOINC logfile,

31-7-2008 16:08:54|SETI@home|Starting task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 528
31-7-2008 16:08:56|SETI@home|Started upload of 02mr08ae.15167.10297.6.8.49_2_0
31-7-2008 16:09:00|SETI@home|Finished upload of 02mr08ae.15167.10297.6.8.49_2_0
31-7-2008 16:37:29|SETI@home|Computation for task 19jn08ad.27214.141896.3.8.129_2 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:29|SETI@home|Starting 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0
31-7-2008 16:37:30|SETI@home|Starting 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Computation for task 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Output file 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0_0 for task 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0 absent
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Computation for task 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Output file 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1_0 for task 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1 absent
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Starting 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.128_0
31-7-2008 16:37:32|SETI@home|Started upload of 19jn08ad.27214.141896.3.8.129_2_0
31-7-2008 16:44:25|SETI@home|Computation for task 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:44:25|SETI@home|Output file 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0_0 for task 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0 absent
31-7-2008 16:58:42|SETI@home|Computation for task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:58:44|SETI@home|Started upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0_0
31-7-2008 16:58:50|SETI@home|Finished upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0_0
31-7-2008 17:02:06|SETI@home|Computation for task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0 finished
31-7-2008 17:02:08|SETI@home|Started upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0_0
31-7-2008 17:02:12|SETI@home|Finished upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0_0

Never this message before?

Ahhh. That's a wonky WU. There were a number produced after last weekend's snafu as mentioned by Matt in the Technical Forum.

F.
ID: 790515 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 790523 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 19:00:34 UTC - in response to Message 790515.  
Last modified: 31 Jul 2008, 19:07:13 UTC

When I looked this afternoon at my X9650, running XP64
saw, about hundred WU's ended in calculating error's!
Nothing on the x86 host's.
It runs the latest BOINC 6.2.14, with AK_V8_SSE4.1 opti app.
Absolutely no idea what's going wrong.
Anybody noticing similar problems?

If you're getting calc errors and wingmen are not, then try winding back the overclock. If wingmen are getting them too, then don't worry about it, it's wonky WU's.

F.


Here a piece off the BOINC logfile,

31-7-2008 16:08:54|SETI@home|Starting task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0 using setiathome_enhanced version 528
31-7-2008 16:08:56|SETI@home|Started upload of 02mr08ae.15167.10297.6.8.49_2_0
31-7-2008 16:09:00|SETI@home|Finished upload of 02mr08ae.15167.10297.6.8.49_2_0
31-7-2008 16:37:29|SETI@home|Computation for task 19jn08ad.27214.141896.3.8.129_2 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:29|SETI@home|Starting 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0
31-7-2008 16:37:30|SETI@home|Starting 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Computation for task 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Output file 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0_0 for task 26jn08aa.20517.392047.10.8.7_0 absent
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Computation for task 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1 finished
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Output file 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1_0 for task 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.116_1 absent
31-7-2008 16:37:31|SETI@home|Starting 01jl08aa.14873.5798.3.8.128_0
31-7-2008 16:37:32|SETI@home|Started upload of 19jn08ad.27214.141896.3.8.129_2_0
31-7-2008 16:44:25|SETI@home|Computation for task 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:44:25|SETI@home|Output file 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0_0 for task 30jn08aa.21507.172444.10.8.55_0 absent
31-7-2008 16:58:42|SETI@home|Computation for task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0 finished
31-7-2008 16:58:44|SETI@home|Started upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0_0
31-7-2008 16:58:50|SETI@home|Finished upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.39_0_0
31-7-2008 17:02:06|SETI@home|Computation for task 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0 finished
31-7-2008 17:02:08|SETI@home|Started upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0_0
31-7-2008 17:02:12|SETI@home|Finished upload of 21jn08aa.10042.23385.5.8.53_0_0

Never this message before?

Ahhh. That's a wonky WU. There were a number produced after last weekend's snafu as mentioned by Matt in the Technical Forum.

F.

31-7-2008 20:49:08|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 1382403 seconds of work, reporting 622 completed tasks

31-7-2008 20:49:23|SETI@home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
31-7-2008 20:49:23|SETI@home|Message from server: No work sent
31-7-2008 20:49:23|SETI@home|Message from server: (reached daily quota of 4 results)


Got 622 off them #$%^%$$#@ WU's and reached my quotum??? for now.
I saw a description off the AstroPulse install, hope that'll work. :)
ID: 790523 · Report as offensive
Profile Sutaru Tsureku
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 790535 - Posted: 31 Jul 2008, 19:44:51 UTC
Last modified: 31 Jul 2008, 20:09:16 UTC

After my last post you have now a lot of:

<core_client_version>6.2.14</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Can't get shared memory segment name: shmget() failed
</message>
]]>


I have no experiences with this message.. hmm.. something new..
But I think this is a problem with your PC or the BOINC client or something other.. ;-)



EDIT:
Two examples of your errors.. and your wingmen have well results..

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=307302635
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=307302563
ID: 790535 · Report as offensive
Profile Keck_Komputers
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 1575
Credit: 4,152,111
RAC: 1
United States
Message 790824 - Posted: 1 Aug 2008, 9:05:37 UTC - in response to Message 790535.  

After my last post you have now a lot of:

<core_client_version>6.2.14</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
Can't get shared memory segment name: shmget() failed
</message>
]]>


I have no experiences with this message.. hmm.. something new..
But I think this is a problem with your PC or the BOINC client or something other.. ;-)



EDIT:
Two examples of your errors.. and your wingmen have well results..

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=307302635
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=307302563

Have you restarted your computer since upgrading to a version 6 client? That is an error I would expect when the new groups do not have their permissions set correctly. A restart will normally fix it, if not reinstall and reboot and see if that helps.

BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8
ID: 790824 · Report as offensive
michael
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 03
Posts: 21
Credit: 183,890
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 790827 - Posted: 1 Aug 2008, 9:15:25 UTC

There are two versions of 6.2.14 one 64 bit and one 32 bit the one on the home download page is 32 bit try all versions page for 64 bit just a thought.

Michael.
ID: 790827 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 790837 - Posted: 1 Aug 2008, 10:11:06 UTC - in response to Message 790827.  

There are two versions of 6.2.14 one 64 bit and one 32 bit the one on the home download page is 32 bit try all versions page for 64 bit just a thought.

Michael.


Thanks very much for your answers, got the host UP & RUNning, could be the problem off a 'double install resedue'.
BOINC 6.1.0. ran on normal conditions and 6.2.14 ran on administrator level and was installed in 2 places: X:\Documents and Settings and X:\BOINC
The previous was installed in X:\Program Files\BOINC\projects\setiathome.berkeley.edu
And the registry is full off @$%^YU . A REinstall would be best!

ID: 790837 · Report as offensive
Profile Fred J. Verster
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Apr 04
Posts: 3252
Credit: 31,903,643
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 791001 - Posted: 1 Aug 2008, 18:23:50 UTC - in response to Message 790837.  
Last modified: 1 Aug 2008, 18:35:24 UTC

There are two versions of 6.2.14 one 64 bit and one 32 bit the one on the home download page is 32 bit try all versions page for 64 bit just a thought.

Michael.


Did have the x64 version installed, but reinstalled now, after uninstalling, ofcoarse.
(There where 2 install's, 1 complete, 6.2.14 and the remainings off 6.1.0 in X:\Program Files, the new, install in X:\Documents and Settings and X:\BOINC)
Thanks very much for your answers, got the host UP & RUNning, was the problem off a 'double install resedue'.
BOINC 6.1.0. ran on normal conditions and 6.2.14 ran on administrator level and was installed in 2 places: X:\Documents and Settings and X:\BOINC
The previous was installed in X:\Program Files\BOINC\projects\setiathome.berkeley.edu
And the registry is full off @$%^YU . A REinstall would be best!


The trouble is even bigger, I've burned my RAM stick's, so turned back the OC (a little) to 3320MHz (QX9650), 10x332, since a have/get no work for this host, have now Ubuntu 7.10 installed and active, works OK, BOOT's from DVD/CD in 16 sec.
Also tried to get work from EINSTEIN, servers are down, NO work and didn't succeed in gettin ASTRO-PULSE WU's
Ordered new RAM, ran mine @ 505MHz!And that was too much, I think.
And my apologies to my wingmen and the fact, that these WU's have to be calculated again, only takes (precious)time.
But,Keep on crunching . . . :)
ID: 791001 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : About a hundred off calculatin error's on the X64 host


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.