Message boards :
Number crunching :
Astropulse binaries for other platforms - Read only
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
Crunch3r has released an optimized version for OS X http://calbe.dw70.de/astrop/astropulse-4.28.i686-apple-darwin_sse3.zip Works quite well and has cut almost 50 hours off the time on my 2.0 GHz iMac. |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
I have released a Astropulse 5.00 application for FreeBSD i386, MacOS Intel, MacOS PPC, NetBSD i386 and OpenBSD i386. |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
I've released a Linux IA64 (Itanium) and Solaris x86 Astropulse 5.00 application. Btw. is due the release of AP 5.00 now AP 4.x obsolated, or will there still send out WUs to AP 4.x clients ? |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Btw. is due the release of AP 5.00 now AP 4.x obsolated, or will there still send out WUs to AP 4.x clients ? Berkeley doesn't discriminate between v4 and v5 - it'll send out work to everyone. But all the stock crunchers, and most of the optimised ones, are now running v5.00 - and anyone still running v4 runs the risk that their work will not validate. You should upgrade to v5 a.s.a.p. |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Btw. is due the release of AP 5.00 now AP 4.x obsolated, or will there still send out WUs to AP 4.x clients ? Now that Dotsch has made it possible for almost any system to be upgraded to 5.00, perhaps the project will finally require 5.00 on new work. It would reduce wasted time considerably, and give a clear indication to those still running 4.35 or 4.36 with an app_info.xml that they should check for the newer version. A total optimist might even believe the project delayed that requirement to give Dotsch time to make the new builds. I'll concede the possibility, but it seems unlikely. Joe |
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
A total optimist might even believe the project delayed that requirement to give Dotsch time to make the new builds. I'll concede the possibility, but it seems unlikely. This is excatly the point why I am asking... I would to write a notification about the state of th 4.x AP client at my homepage and the several threads, that the users should upgrade to 5.00. Also I have not finished all mayor platform ports of AP5, to it's good to know how much I have got to hurry... |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
I've released a Astropulse 5.00 application for Solaris SPARC. |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
Binaries for Linux Power/PowerPC and NetBSD x86_64/AMD64 are now also available. |
Rene Send message Joined: 30 Jan 01 Posts: 25 Credit: 690,805 RAC: 0 |
I've tested compiling my version of Seti@Home / Astropulse on FreeBSD 7.1/amd64 but it fails in the configure stage. This also happens on FreeBSD 7.1/i386. The log is available at ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/sah_371.txt (17219 bytes) The diff to the current port (Seti@Home 5.27): ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/sah-371-port.diff (11129 bytes) The source diff for Seti@Home (svn 371): ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/seti_boinc.diff (2724 bytes) The source diff for Astropulse (svn 371): ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/astropulse.diff (1091 bytes) Does anyone know what's going on? |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
yes. wrong shell. try sudo rm /bin/sh sudo ln -s /bin/bash /bin/sh HTH Join BOINC United now! |
Rene Send message Joined: 30 Jan 01 Posts: 25 Credit: 690,805 RAC: 0 |
Strange, astrpoulse passed configure with sh on FreeBSD 7.0 But I will try bash. |
Blurf Send message Joined: 2 Sep 06 Posts: 8962 Credit: 12,678,685 RAC: 0 |
Just a FYI we are currently looking into combining the two threads of Optimized Astropulse for Windows issues, install, questions and Astropulse binaries for other platforms - Read only |
Rene Send message Joined: 30 Jan 01 Posts: 25 Credit: 690,805 RAC: 0 |
Substituting sh with bash helped, but now I get a compile error for astropulse. This is probably an error in the source code. I'm using SVN for both astropulse and setiathome: self % svn info Path: . URL: https://setisvn.ssl.berkeley.edu/svn/astropulse Repository Root: https://setisvn.ssl.berkeley.edu/svn Repository UUID: ce18c45e-0eac-4cad-939e-398e9871e6ff Revision: 372 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: vonkorff Last Changed Rev: 360 Last Changed Date: 2008-11-24 21:53:02 +0100 (Mon, 24 Nov 2008) The error log is available at ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/astropulse-compile-error.txt (42924 bytes) The new port diff: ftp://rene-ladan.nl/pub/freebsd/sah-371-port.diff (11354 bytes) Am I right that SVN always contains the latest source code? |
Rene Send message Joined: 30 Jan 01 Posts: 25 Credit: 690,805 RAC: 0 |
Google doesn't know the fold_buf_{long|short}_{pos|neg} functions either. |
Urs Echternacht Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 |
Google doesn't know the fold_buf_{long|short}_{pos|neg} functions either. Most possible an undeclared variable, because of work in progress. You could always tell svn to download an older revision. _\|/_ U r s |
Rene Send message Joined: 30 Jan 01 Posts: 25 Credit: 690,805 RAC: 0 |
Google doesn't know the fold_buf_{long|short}_{pos|neg} functions either. I know. Is there a list of svn revisions used as releases? |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
... No, but successful builds are usually "installed" at SETI Beta promptly. Astropulse 5.00 appeared there 6 Nov 2008 5:05:27 UTC, so from the revision log you should be able to judge. I believe Rev 352 was the last applicable change. The recent changes may indicate beginning work on a new Beta which will do repetitive pulse searching for negative dispersions as well as the positive dispersions to which it is limited now. See the Science paper referenced on the front page here during November for some discussion of why they want to check both. Joe |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
Some days after Astropulse 5.00 was released in the beta project the SVN version was 354. |
Dotsch Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 2422 Credit: 919,393 RAC: 0 |
I've released a Astropulse 5.00 application for HPUX 11i V.1..3 on PARISC The following Astropulse 5.00 applications are available : - Offical Astropulse application from the project : Windows x86 Linux x86 Linux x86_64 - http://www.dotsch.de/seti : FreeBSD i386 HPUX 11i PARISC 2.0 (64 bit) Linux IA64 Linux PowerPC/Power MacOS =>10.4 Intel MacOS =>10.4 PowerPC OpenBSD i386 NetBSD i386 NetBSD x86_64/AMD64 Solaris SPARC Solaris 10 x86 In work : AIX, FreeBSD x86_64, HPUX IA64, Linux PS3 and OpenBSD x86_64 Any more porting wishes ? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.