Congrats but remember, Fame is a fleeting thing, and the code we write is written in sand. Some call it sillicon:) Oooops is that the next wave I see on the horizon?

Good Job
Pilot

---

When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.

Only just on top at the moment, so it is still close.

It appears he is using the AK-Whaleport

<core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
OS X optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan
Version info: OS X SSE4.1 (Intel, Xeon-optimized p8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan
Windows Port: JDWhale V0.2X xS|IPP_SSE4.1 8018 Mhz

Work Unit Info:
...............

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Next question is: What is the CPU/memory speeds? How much overclocking has been undertaken to get it to this point?

After all is the 8018 Mhz really correct? I don't think so...

---

Never surrender and never give up. In the darkest hour there is always hope.

I believe Mr.Who? is running eight cores at 4.0 Gig. Scroll down through the tasks until you find a completed one. Click on the work unit.

---

Confidence: Remember that feeling you had just before you truely understood the situation?

still climbing

who?

---

who?
Skulltrail D5400XS

Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
My Skulltrail is running now, with 2 GHz (not oced)
----------------------------------------------------
Computer ID 4387433
Report deadline 12 Jun 2008 22:15:52 UTC
CPU time 5570.016
stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan
Version info: SSE4.1 (Intel, Core 2-optimized v8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan
SSE4.1 Win64 Build 42 , Ported by : Jason G, Raistmer, JDWhale

CPUID: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz
Speed: 4 x 1995 MHz
Cache: L1=64K L2=6144K
Features: MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1

Work Unit Info:
...............
Credit multiplier is : 2.85
WU true angle range is : 0.406782

Flopcounter: 16458015224532.846000

Spike count: 0
Pulse count: 0
Triplet count: 0
Gaussian count: 0
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 54.3050231481481
Granted credit 54.3050231481481
application version 5.28
-----------------------------
Sure some oced quads have better timings, but we will see what the future developement bring us.
heinz

It's an interesting race to the top and it's all good!

Live long and BOINC!

---

Paul
(S@H1 8888)
And proud of it!

SSE4.1 or SSSE3x ? I would go with SSSE3x:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=45971&nowrap=true#756684

Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
...

Hey, my QX6700 is running faster.. ;-) :-D

[b]CPU time 3188.531[/b] 
stderr out <core_client_version>6.1.0</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan
Version info: SSSE3x (Intel, Core 2-optimized v8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan
SSSE3x Win32 Build 41 , Ported by : Jason G, Raistmer, JDWhale

     [b]CPUID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU           @ 2.66GHz
     Speed: 4 x 3143 MHz[/b] 
     Cache: L1=64K L2=4096K
  Features: MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 
 
Work Unit Info:
...............
Credit multiplier is :  2.85
WU true angle range is :  0.406880

Flopcounter: 16453481286828.516000

Spike count:    0
Pulse count:    0
Triplet count:  0
Gaussian count: 0
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>
 
Validate state Initial 
[b]Claimed credit 54.2900694444444[/b] 

---

SSE4.1 or SSSE3x ? I would go with SSSE3x:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=45971&nowrap=true#756684

Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
...

Hey, my QX6700 is running faster.. ;-) :-D

[b]CPU time 3188.531[/b] 
stderr out <core_client_version>6.1.0</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan
Version info: SSSE3x (Intel, Core 2-optimized v8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan
SSSE3x Win32 Build 41 , Ported by : Jason G, Raistmer, JDWhale

     [b]CPUID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU           @ 2.66GHz
     Speed: 4 x 3143 MHz[/b] 
     Cache: L1=64K L2=4096K
  Features: MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 
 
Work Unit Info:
...............
Credit multiplier is :  2.85
WU true angle range is :  0.406880

Flopcounter: 16453481286828.516000

Spike count:    0
Pulse count:    0
Triplet count:  0
Gaussian count: 0
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>
 
Validate state Initial 
[b]Claimed credit 54.2900694444444[/b] 

What planet are you on, Apart from Marks Frozen penny, francois SKT is the fastest runnng machine at the minute.

Sutura is your machine running at 8 x 4050MHz or so? NO.

---

SSE4.1 or SSSE3x ? I would go with SSSE3x:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=45971&nowrap=true#756684



[quote]Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
...

Hey, my QX6700 is running faster.. ;-) :-D


What planet are you on, Apart from Marks Frozen penny, francois SKT is the fastest runnng machine at the minute.

Sutura is your machine running at 8 x 4050MHz or so? NO.

Satan, per core that skulltrail isn't so fast. Many q6600's and 9450 etc have shorter times than the 8 and 16 core xeons etc. Those machines get higher in the top-x list because they have more cores. Heck, my q6600 at 3.3 GHz does better than the times the skulltrail needs (and that is my slowest 24/7 cruncher!).

Regards,
John.

snip

What planet are you on, Apart from Marks Frozen penny, francois SKT is the fastest runnng machine at the minute.

Sutura is your machine running at 8 x 4050MHz or so? NO.

I'm guessing there are plenty of people running their rigs at 4GHz plus...I know I run my X9650 @ 4.1GHz 24/7, BUT that doesn't quite help aganist the massive onslaught of twice the number of cores...

On a 54.3 credit unit where Francois manages to finish in 3500s I do around 2350s. Still not enough, but an interesting comparison (for me that is;).
/Anton

mr.kjellen X9650 x 4 Cores -> 7,327.06 x 2 = 14,654.12 RAC
Who? X9775 x 8 Cores -> 11,177.87 RAC

How is the power consumption? Costs of buying?
I think Wattage / Credits would be two separately Quad-Core-PCs, or?


How it will be with the new 8 x Core CPUs?

---

mr.kjellen X9650 x 4 Cores -> 7,327.06 x 2 = 14,654.12 RAC
Who? X9775 x 8 Cores -> 11,177.87 RAC

How is the power consumption? Costs of buying?
I think Wattage / Credits would be two separately Quad-Core-PCs, or?


How it will be with the new 8 x Core CPUs?

In computer design, x 2 is easy to say, it is hard to do.
The real problem is to feed that 8 cores at 4.0Ghz ... With 4 cores, it is much easier.
I think we got it right on the next architecture for many cores. Get ready for traumatic experience ... Can't say more.

who?

... Can't say more.

who?

Oh...come on! Of course you can!! ;)

... Can't say more.

who?

Oh...come on! Of course you can!! ;)

No actually, He can't, As It's like He's under an NDA and such, So don't ask Him.

---

The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's

As you all know Intel has running in their labs already a 80 core since 2006, maybe they are comming out with the 32nm process end of the year with a 16 or 32 core chip in the production line. Let us wait and see.

heinz

Well we all know what it's called and we all know how many cores the next SKT will have.

Nehalem and 16. That will be one hell of a beast. Looking at finding the funds for a windows version.

---

Well we all know what it's called and we all know how many cores the next SKT will have.

Nehalem and 16. That will be one hell of a beast. Looking at finding the funds for a windows version.

Ditto, but I am waiting for it on the 32nM fabrications.

Someone said that with the Nehalem there was a possibility of introducing HT again, giving a 16 core chip a capability of running 2 threads per core.

I am looking forwards to the Xeon version so I can build a dual processor system (16 cores + HT per CPU)

---

It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues

Yep waiting for the end of 2009 as well. They will be some killer machines. I may take my first foray into building my own machine and over clock the crap out of it. Will have to see the fund situation at the time though.

---

I read somewhere that the Nehalem would have over 2 billion transistors and 30 MB L2!!

*Actually according to google it wont. Its the Tukwila that will have that.

~BoB

---

Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957
Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957

The Itanium lot will be very impressive chips, but I don't think we'll find that sort of stuff on normal desktop line chips for a number of years.

---