Who's Skull Prevails at Last


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : Who's Skull Prevails at Last

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
Author Message
Profile Pilot
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 534
Credit: 5,475,482
RAC: 0
Message 756682 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 2:46:45 UTC

Congrats but remember, Fame is a fleeting thing, and the code we write is written in sand. Some call it sillicon:) Oooops is that the next wave I see on the horizon?

Good Job
Pilot
____________
When we finally figure it all out, all the rules will change and we can start all over again.

Profile Gavin Shaw
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 8 Aug 00
Posts: 1116
Credit: 1,304,337
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 756685 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 2:59:32 UTC

Only just on top at the moment, so it is still close.

It appears he is using the AK-Whaleport

<core_client_version>5.10.30</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
OS X optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan
Version info: OS X SSE4.1 (Intel, Xeon-optimized p8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan
Windows Port: JDWhale V0.2X xS|IPP_SSE4.1 8018 Mhz

Work Unit Info:
...............

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Next question is: What is the CPU/memory speeds? How much overclocking has been undertaken to get it to this point?

After all is the 8018 Mhz really correct? I don't think so...

____________
Never surrender and never give up. In the darkest hour there is always hope.

Profile chaco
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 8 May 99
Posts: 42
Credit: 23,900,515
RAC: 0
Italy
Message 756691 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 3:27:54 UTC

I believe Mr.Who? is running eight cores at 4.0 Gig. Scroll down through the tasks until you find a completed one. Click on the work unit.
____________
Confidence: Remember that feeling you had just before you truely understood the situation?

Profile Francois Piednoel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 Jun 00
Posts: 898
Credit: 5,969,320
RAC: 0
United States
Message 756711 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 6:09:02 UTC - in response to Message 756691.



still climbing

who?
____________
who?
Skulltrail D5400XS

_heinz
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 680
Credit: 5,218,220
RAC: 0
France
Message 756731 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 7:14:32 UTC

Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
My Skulltrail is running now, with 2 GHz (not oced)
----------------------------------------------------
Computer ID 4387433
Report deadline 12 Jun 2008 22:15:52 UTC
CPU time 5570.016
stderr out <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan
Version info: SSE4.1 (Intel, Core 2-optimized v8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan
SSE4.1 Win64 Build 42 , Ported by : Jason G, Raistmer, JDWhale

CPUID: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5405 @ 2.00GHz
Speed: 4 x 1995 MHz
Cache: L1=64K L2=6144K
Features: MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4.1

Work Unit Info:
...............
Credit multiplier is : 2.85
WU true angle range is : 0.406782

Flopcounter: 16458015224532.846000

Spike count: 0
Pulse count: 0
Triplet count: 0
Gaussian count: 0
called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

Validate state Valid
Claimed credit 54.3050231481481
Granted credit 54.3050231481481
application version 5.28
-----------------------------
Sure some oced quads have better timings, but we will see what the future developement bring us.
heinz

Profile The Gas Giant
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 01
Posts: 1896
Credit: 2,622,541
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 756794 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 11:35:04 UTC

It's an interesting race to the top and it's all good!

Live long and BOINC!

____________
Paul
(S@H1 8888)
And proud of it!

Profile [seti.international] Dirk SadowskiProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 61,055,650
RAC: 18,314
Germany
Message 756797 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 11:56:49 UTC - in response to Message 756731.
Last modified: 22 May 2008, 12:05:01 UTC

SSE4.1 or SSSE3x ? I would go with SSSE3x:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=45971&nowrap=true#756684



Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
...

Hey, my QX6700 is running faster.. ;-) :-D


[b]CPU time 3188.531[/b] stderr out <core_client_version>6.1.0</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan Version info: SSSE3x (Intel, Core 2-optimized v8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan SSSE3x Win32 Build 41 , Ported by : Jason G, Raistmer, JDWhale [b]CPUID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU @ 2.66GHz Speed: 4 x 3143 MHz[/b] Cache: L1=64K L2=4096K Features: MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 Work Unit Info: ............... Credit multiplier is : 2.85 WU true angle range is : 0.406880 Flopcounter: 16453481286828.516000 Spike count: 0 Pulse count: 0 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Initial [b]Claimed credit 54.2900694444444[/b]

____________
BR

SETI@home Needs your Help ... $10 & U get a Star!

Team seti.international

Das Deutsche Cafe. The German Cafe.

Profile SATAN
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 06
Posts: 835
Credit: 2,094,367
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 756824 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 13:49:35 UTC - in response to Message 756797.

SSE4.1 or SSSE3x ? I would go with SSSE3x:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=45971&nowrap=true#756684



Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
...

Hey, my QX6700 is running faster.. ;-) :-D


[b]CPU time 3188.531[/b] stderr out <core_client_version>6.1.0</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> Windows optimized S@H Enhanced application by Alex Kan Version info: SSSE3x (Intel, Core 2-optimized v8-nographics) V5.13 by Alex Kan SSSE3x Win32 Build 41 , Ported by : Jason G, Raistmer, JDWhale [b]CPUID: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU @ 2.66GHz Speed: 4 x 3143 MHz[/b] Cache: L1=64K L2=4096K Features: MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 Work Unit Info: ............... Credit multiplier is : 2.85 WU true angle range is : 0.406880 Flopcounter: 16453481286828.516000 Spike count: 0 Pulse count: 0 Triplet count: 0 Gaussian count: 0 called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Initial [b]Claimed credit 54.2900694444444[/b]


What planet are you on, Apart from Marks Frozen penny, francois SKT is the fastest runnng machine at the minute.

Sutura is your machine running at 8 x 4050MHz or so? NO.

____________

john deneer
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Nov 06
Posts: 331
Credit: 20,996,195
RAC: 0
Netherlands
Message 756825 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 13:55:00 UTC - in response to Message 756824.
Last modified: 22 May 2008, 13:56:56 UTC

SSE4.1 or SSSE3x ? I would go with SSSE3x:
http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=45971&nowrap=true#756684



[quote]Hi Francois,

I'm impressed about your ocing, nice numbers, smaller as a hour 3511.421875 for a 54,30 credit unit.
...

Hey, my QX6700 is running faster.. ;-) :-D


What planet are you on, Apart from Marks Frozen penny, francois SKT is the fastest runnng machine at the minute.

Sutura is your machine running at 8 x 4050MHz or so? NO.


Satan, per core that skulltrail isn't so fast. Many q6600's and 9450 etc have shorter times than the 8 and 16 core xeons etc. Those machines get higher in the top-x list because they have more cores. Heck, my q6600 at 3.3 GHz does better than the times the skulltrail needs (and that is my slowest 24/7 cruncher!).

Regards,
John.

Profile mr.kjellen
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 01
Posts: 195
Credit: 70,063,810
RAC: 12,831
Sweden
Message 756828 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 14:08:50 UTC - in response to Message 756824.



snip

What planet are you on, Apart from Marks Frozen penny, francois SKT is the fastest runnng machine at the minute.

Sutura is your machine running at 8 x 4050MHz or so? NO.


I'm guessing there are plenty of people running their rigs at 4GHz plus...I know I run my X9650 @ 4.1GHz 24/7, BUT that doesn't quite help aganist the massive onslaught of twice the number of cores...

On a 54.3 credit unit where Francois manages to finish in 3500s I do around 2350s. Still not enough, but an interesting comparison (for me that is;).
/Anton

Profile [seti.international] Dirk SadowskiProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 61,055,650
RAC: 18,314
Germany
Message 756837 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 14:39:29 UTC
Last modified: 22 May 2008, 14:47:38 UTC

mr.kjellen X9650 x 4 Cores -> 7,327.06 x 2 = 14,654.12 RAC
Who? X9775 x 8 Cores -> 11,177.87 RAC

How is the power consumption? Costs of buying?
I think Wattage / Credits would be two separately Quad-Core-PCs, or?


How it will be with the new 8 x Core CPUs?
____________
BR

SETI@home Needs your Help ... $10 & U get a Star!

Team seti.international

Das Deutsche Cafe. The German Cafe.

Profile Francois Piednoel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 14 Jun 00
Posts: 898
Credit: 5,969,320
RAC: 0
United States
Message 756849 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 14:57:37 UTC - in response to Message 756837.
Last modified: 22 May 2008, 15:04:05 UTC

mr.kjellen X9650 x 4 Cores -> 7,327.06 x 2 = 14,654.12 RAC
Who? X9775 x 8 Cores -> 11,177.87 RAC

How is the power consumption? Costs of buying?
I think Wattage / Credits would be two separately Quad-Core-PCs, or?


How it will be with the new 8 x Core CPUs?


In computer design, x 2 is easy to say, it is hard to do.
The real problem is to feed that 8 cores at 4.0Ghz ... With 4 cores, it is much easier.
I think we got it right on the next architecture for many cores. Get ready for traumatic experience ... Can't say more.

who?

Profile mr.kjellen
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 01
Posts: 195
Credit: 70,063,810
RAC: 12,831
Sweden
Message 756858 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 15:16:47 UTC - in response to Message 756849.


... Can't say more.

who?


Oh...come on! Of course you can!! ;)

zoom314Project donor
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 46546
Credit: 36,897,981
RAC: 5,362
United States
Message 756859 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 15:18:46 UTC - in response to Message 756858.


... Can't say more.

who?


Oh...come on! Of course you can!! ;)

No actually, He can't, As It's like He's under an NDA and such, So don't ask Him.
____________
My Facebook, War Commander, 2015

Profile Chris SProject donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 19 Nov 00
Posts: 32166
Credit: 13,942,561
RAC: 24,563
United Kingdom
Message 756869 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 15:31:49 UTC

How about 12 cores?

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/145608/amd_jumps_to_12core_chip_skips_8core_chip_plans.html
____________
Damsel Rescuer, Uli Devotee, Julie Supporter, ES99 Admirer,
Raccoon Friend, Anniet fan, Dominant Culture Member


_heinz
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 05
Posts: 680
Credit: 5,218,220
RAC: 0
France
Message 756871 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 15:46:58 UTC

As you all know Intel has running in their labs already a 80 core since 2006, maybe they are comming out with the 32nm process end of the year with a 16 or 32 core chip in the production line. Let us wait and see.

heinz

Profile SATAN
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 06
Posts: 835
Credit: 2,094,367
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 756874 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 16:02:39 UTC

Well we all know what it's called and we all know how many cores the next SKT will have.

Nehalem and 16. That will be one hell of a beast. Looking at finding the funds for a windows version.
____________

Profile John Clark
Volunteer tester
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 99
Posts: 16515
Credit: 4,418,829
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 756887 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 16:43:35 UTC - in response to Message 756874.
Last modified: 22 May 2008, 16:44:46 UTC

Well we all know what it's called and we all know how many cores the next SKT will have.

Nehalem and 16. That will be one hell of a beast. Looking at finding the funds for a windows version.


Ditto, but I am waiting for it on the 32nM fabrications.

Someone said that with the Nehalem there was a possibility of introducing HT again, giving a 16 core chip a capability of running 2 threads per core.

I am looking forwards to the Xeon version so I can build a dual processor system (16 cores + HT per CPU)
____________
It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues



Profile SATAN
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 27 Aug 06
Posts: 835
Credit: 2,094,367
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 756890 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 16:49:04 UTC

Yep waiting for the end of 2009 as well. They will be some killer machines. I may take my first foray into building my own machine and over clock the crap out of it. Will have to see the fund situation at the time though.

____________

Profile popandbob
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 19 Mar 05
Posts: 535
Credit: 1,896,421
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 756891 - Posted: 22 May 2008, 16:50:30 UTC

I read somewhere that the Nehalem would have over 2 billion transistors and 30 MB L2!!

*Actually according to google it wont. Its the Tukwila that will have that.

~BoB
____________


Do you Good Search for Seti@Home? http://www.goodsearch.com/?charityid=888957
Or Good Shop? http://www.goodshop.com/?charityid=888957

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Who's Skull Prevails at Last

Copyright © 2014 University of California