Message boards :
Number crunching :
Linux port of Alex v8 code
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
Very nice, my AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 went from 11438s (2.4V) to 10362s (V8 SSE3) for a 63.98Cr WU. Linux Port ? I don't know but i made one on the fly... AK V8 SSE3 on linux* * running in vmware first result should be done in about 20 mins or so... Join BOINC United now! |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
Very nice, my AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 went from 11438s (2.4V) to 10362s (V8 SSE3) for a 63.98Cr WU. Cool, I was hoping someone would pick it up quick ;D good 'o carry on! "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
|
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65745 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
First result is done... How quick did the WU crunch, Crunch3r? As in how much time did the WU take to be crunched? The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
First result is done... CPU time (sec) claimed credit 602.87 20.05 pending 3,249.19 63.98 pending 2,432.77 54.24 pending Link to all results so far... Join BOINC United now! |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
Build #42? ... The answer to the question of life the universe and everything? "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 630 Credit: 59,973,836 RAC: 0 |
First result is done... Cool! I struggled for days trying to get it to compile statically with Intel's latest IDE/IPP. Well done! |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
First result is done... why ? except for some typos like #include "analysefuncs.h" where it should have been "analyseFuncs.h" and some other stuff that i ripped off like the ipp_static_test.h" or so... all seems to be fine... (of course the cpuid stuff is gone as well, i made a library out of the 2.2b/2.4 cpuid function and linked that in ... Anyhow, jason got the binary and some of you folks at lunatics that run linux natively( not in vmware) should do some tests if it's as fast as the windows binary... I'm still unable to connect to lunatics.kwsn.net ... otherwise i would have posted there myself :( Join BOINC United now! |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
Build #42? ... The answer to the question of life the universe and everything? LOL ... well that's what was in the analysefuncts.cpp ... i didn't change that ... Join BOINC United now! |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65745 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
First result is done... Let's see that's around: 10.04 minutes for the 20.05 40.54 minutes for the 54.24 54.15 minutes for the 63.98 Not bad, Doesn't sound too bad at all. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
i have no clue if that's good or not... i'm running that test app in vmware using 2 cpus of my V8 rig which is a dual quad core xeon 5365 @ 3 ghz (on the windows part it's cruching 6 riesel sieve wus at once) Join BOINC United now! |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
I've posted in Lunatics development areas for anyone running Linux NATIVE to test. As it happens my Ubuntu VM is running stock at the moment, took me a a while to figure that out, now I need to figure out how to install opt app in Linux :S [Calling all Linux Dudes .... Impending Emergency Eject :S] Jason "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Gecko Send message Joined: 17 Nov 99 Posts: 454 Credit: 6,946,910 RAC: 47 |
First result is done... Wooaahhh!....CRASH!!! (as I fall out of chair) : 0 So, you're running 2 instances w/ RS on the other 6? Those times are freakishly fast compared to times on: [#10 Bad to the Bone] 54.24 63.98 The difference is so massive there's got to be another factor in this. Reported time for VLAR is even @25% quicker than #1 MAC? [63.98] Running in VMware quicker than running native? (how does this make sense?) Ideas to explain these times??? |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
exactly... EDIT here's a picture
actually from what i've seen in the past, running in vmware is slower than running it natively. Join BOINC United now! |
Gecko Send message Joined: 17 Nov 99 Posts: 454 Credit: 6,946,910 RAC: 47 |
Very nice & I don't just mean the set-up ; >) actually from what i've seen in the past, running in vmware is slower than running it natively. Well, that is what one should expect so at least my sanity is still intact :P Doesn't the speed surprise you? Will it do that running the aps on all 8 cores? (still scratching head...) |
hiamps Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 4292 Credit: 72,971,319 RAC: 0 |
Very nice, my AMD Athlon X2 BE-2350 went from 11438s (2.4V) to 10362s (V8 SSE3) for a 63.98Cr WU. I don't know why....But I am not suprised...Now if you could do a sse2 on the fly...Just joking, but right on... Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons... And no good credit hound! |
Crunch3r Send message Joined: 15 Apr 99 Posts: 1546 Credit: 3,438,823 RAC: 0 |
got no clue what your talking about :P actually from what i've seen in the past, running in vmware is slower than running it natively. no... cuz i don't have a reference to windows... i haven't been running sah for months because the credit is poor.
I don't know... i could reboot the machine an try running the app on fedora core 8 (x64) to see if it behaves the same way there while running 8 instances of sah.. EDIT of course it had to happen ... first wu got validated and i got pared up with a host running boinc 4.45 ... instead og getting 20 credits i got 8 :( Join BOINC United now! |
Gecko Send message Joined: 17 Nov 99 Posts: 454 Credit: 6,946,910 RAC: 47 |
Your 54.36=2415 secs is substantially quicker than Francois running JDWale ap + Vista on this WU: 54.33=3452 secs (best compo I could find w/ his rig) ....except he is running a Hapertown X9775 3.2GHz OC'd to 4.0Ghz. The JDWhale ap is within a few % of the new release ap for -doze. F' is running 1Ghz more clock and 50% more cache of the next-gen cpu. The linux port on your rig is somehow still spanking it....ALOT. |
JDWhale Send message Joined: 6 Apr 99 Posts: 921 Credit: 21,935,817 RAC: 3 |
No doubt. But the compare is not complete without running 8 cores loaded native Linux. You might check out UL1's X5482 rig, though still slower on a per/core basis the clock is much closer to Crunch3rs rig. |
[KWSN]John Galt 007 Send message Joined: 9 Nov 99 Posts: 2444 Credit: 25,086,197 RAC: 0 |
Dang...and I just blew my Linux box away and reinstalled XP last night...I would have been able to test a Q6600@2.997gHz (best OC for that board as of now) running 4 SETI... Well, I did get a Q9300 this afternoon. Might have to try it at stock speed before giving it over to XP. Clk2HlpSetiCty:::PayIt4ward |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.