First Signs of the NTPCkr


log in

Advanced search

Message boards : SETI@home Science : First Signs of the NTPCkr

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Author Message
Profile Matt Lebofsky
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 99
Posts: 1390
Credit: 74,079
RAC: 0
United States
Message 925175 - Posted: 10 Aug 2009, 16:43:04 UTC - in response to Message 924180.

The first rev of the NTPCkr will not be incorporating Astropulse data - at any rate, if Astropulse detected anything that may also be signs of ETI, then SETI@home would have detected it as well.

- Matt
____________
-- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person
-- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude

Profile ML1
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 8574
Credit: 4,234,019
RAC: 851
United Kingdom
Message 925532 - Posted: 12 Aug 2009, 10:49:53 UTC - in response to Message 925175.
Last modified: 12 Aug 2009, 10:52:23 UTC

Could anything be reported for Astropulse for "sort of" NTPCkr-style for anything found? For example, something along the lines of what is done over on Einstein@home for their (re-)discovered pulsars list?

A running tally of "hits" should be good to boost morale and might even be useful for other searchers and searches.

Keep up the good work!

Regards,
Martin
____________
See new freedom: Mageia4
Linux Voice See & try out your OS Freedom!
The Future is what We make IT (GPLv3)

Profile Balveda*
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 08
Posts: 310
Credit: 376,456
RAC: 0
Message 925642 - Posted: 12 Aug 2009, 19:48:51 UTC

Looking forward to this! Way to go Matt and everyone else involved in the project!
____________

Norwich Gadfly
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Dec 08
Posts: 100
Credit: 488,414
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 925778 - Posted: 13 Aug 2009, 7:07:27 UTC - in response to Message 925175.

The first rev of the NTPCkr will not be incorporating Astropulse data - at any rate, if Astropulse detected anything that may also be signs of ETI, then SETI@home would have detected it as well.

- Matt


Sorry, but have I missed something ? You developed Astropulse to detect some things that the original S@H (Multi-beam) could not detect, now you say you won't miss anything by ignoring Astropulse data ?

Profile Dr. C.E.T.I.
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 00
Posts: 15993
Credit: 690,597
RAC: 0
United States
Message 991087 - Posted: 22 Apr 2010, 12:58:11 UTC - in response to Message 907789.




. . . clears throat - uhmmmm, any News to Post here?



. . . clears throat, AGain - uhmmmm, any News to Post here?


____________
BOINC Wiki . . .

Science Status Page . . .

C Olival
Send message
Joined: 6 Sep 10
Posts: 209
Credit: 10,675
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1068125 - Posted: 19 Jan 2011, 4:10:02 UTC - in response to Message 991087.

what is the likehood of a signal given off by any trasitent alien craft, setalines, being captured by radio telescopes

Profile Blurf
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 7621
Credit: 7,027,026
RAC: 814
United States
Message 1171777 - Posted: 18 Nov 2011, 0:05:50 UTC

Any NITPCKR news??
____________


musicplayer
Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 1475
Credit: 745,525
RAC: 711
Message 1171792 - Posted: 18 Nov 2011, 1:19:20 UTC - in response to Message 1068125.

I guess that possible candidates found by means of the Seti@home client are currently being re-observed by means of the Arecibo Radio Telescope.

Can something new be learnt or found by means of such re-obervations of possible candidates?

Possibly what was once a candidate might well be eliminated from the list of candidates as well in such instances where there appears to be nothing found.

The opposite might go as well. A re-observation of a candidate might return the similar signal or result once more making it even more interesting.

But still there may be a long way (or at least some way) to go in order to find something of real interest. A gaussian score (or two) is not necessarily the same as an intelligent signal.

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2621
Credit: 1,180,227
RAC: 12
United States
Message 1171804 - Posted: 18 Nov 2011, 2:37:19 UTC - in response to Message 1171792.
Last modified: 18 Nov 2011, 2:38:18 UTC

Lately I have come to believe that this may be a failed strategy. Finding a repeated signal at the same location would mean that a broadcast situation would be in effect. My guess is that only a focused high intensity beam (which would be sprayed in randon directions) could reach us. No broadcasts have been found and we may not be able to find them if they are out to say 1000 light years. There are not that many stars out to that distance. The focused beacon would not repeat since they wouldn't know where we are and our radiation is only our a little more than 100 light years.

I think that if a signal shows signs of having intelligence (non random information) then it should be examined for a "we are here" type of message

musicplayer
Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 1475
Credit: 745,525
RAC: 711
Message 1171836 - Posted: 18 Nov 2011, 3:56:10 UTC - in response to Message 1171804.
Last modified: 18 Nov 2011, 4:40:32 UTC

> My guess is that only a focused high intensity beam (which would be sprayed in randon directions) could reach us.


If a focused beam by some chance should reach us and by means of some coincidence be detected here, how would such a focused beam (which then would be a radio beam) look like (meaning its possible contents)?

In addition, the duration of such a beam could be quite short in length, possibly only seconds or even less than that.

Would the contents of such a beam be translatable by us and its meaning being interpreted as well as understood?

In any case a possible message of intelligent nature could be broadcast by means of such a beam and could possibly be detected.

Also there may exist other Type 0 civilizations out there like our own who may chose to be foolish enough to make their presence be known to others in the distance. If so, we are lucky to be knowing about such presence.

Profile William Rothamel
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 06
Posts: 2621
Credit: 1,180,227
RAC: 12
United States
Message 1183649 - Posted: 8 Jan 2012, 1:59:50 UTC - in response to Message 1171836.

At the Lyman Hydrogen line the bit rate (Bandwidth) would be sufficient to acquire a longish message in a fraction of a second. Say, a count of the first 50 prime numbers and then a bitmap image that possibly could identify their home planet. A reply would be meaningless since they would almost surely be more than 100 light years away.

It would be enough probably for us to know that there is someone else and possibly where they were.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3
Post to thread

Message boards : SETI@home Science : First Signs of the NTPCkr

Copyright © 2014 University of California